2.3.8 · D5Modern Physics
Question bank — Wave function ψ — probability density - ψ - ²
Before you start, three words earn their keep here:
- Amplitude — the raw complex value at a point (can be negative or imaginary).
- Density — probability per unit length, i.e. ; you must multiply by a length (integrate) to get an actual probability.
- Global phase — multiplying all of by one fixed factor (same everywhere).
True or false — justify
True or false: at a single point is the probability of finding the particle exactly at .
False. is a density; the probability at an exact point is . You must integrate over an interval to get a real probability.
True or false: If , then is normalized by dividing it by .
False. Normalization acts on , which is quadratic in . Divide by so that divides by .
True or false: Two wave functions and (same fixed ) predict identical measurement outcomes.
True. , so every prediction built from the density is unchanged. A global phase is physically invisible.
True or false: A position-dependent phase is also physically invisible.
False. It cancels in of a single state, but it carries momentum information and matters in momentum and interference. Only a constant (global) phase is invisible.
True or false: is the physical wave you could in principle measure directly, like a water ripple.
False. is a complex probability amplitude, not a physical displacement. Only and expectation values built from are measurable.
True or false: If is everywhere real, then .
True. For real , , so . But for complex , (e.g. gives but ).
True or false: A function that grows without bound as can still be a valid physical wave function.
False. It fails square-integrability: would diverge, so it cannot be normalized to total probability 1.
True or false: A constant function over all of infinite space is a legal normalized wave function.
False. , so it cannot be normalized. (It is a useful idealization for a plane wave, but not a genuine physical state.)
True or false: Multiplying by a real constant leaves the physics unchanged, just like a phase does.
False. A real factor multiplies by , changing total probability from 1 to 4 — that breaks normalization. Only unit-modulus factors () leave physics intact.
Spot the error
Find the flaw: "Since is a probability, it must satisfy ."
is not a probability; it is an amplitude that can be negative or complex. The constrained-to- object is a probability, obtained only after .
Find the flaw: ", like evaluating an antiderivative."
You must integrate the density: . is the integrand, not the antiderivative, so subtracting its endpoint values is meaningless.
Find the flaw: "To normalize I set at the peak, giving ."
Normalization is a condition on the total area , not on the peak value. The peak height is whatever it must be so the area equals 1.
Find the flaw: "For , I compute ."
You squared instead of taking . Correctly , a constant — the phase cancels.
Find the flaw: "The units of in 1D are the same as probability, dimensionless."
has units (probability per length), so has units . It is not dimensionless.
Find the flaw: " can sometimes be negative if is very negative."
Never. Writing , always. The whole point of squaring the modulus is to guarantee non-negativity.
Find the flaw: "In Particle in a Box with , I normalize by integrating from to ."
is zero outside , so the integral runs only over : . Integrating the always-zero tails adds nothing but signals a misunderstanding of the domain.
Why questions
Why do we use rather than , which is also non-negative?
Interference experiments (e.g. electron diffraction) show amplitudes add first, then get squared. Predictions match , not ; nature selects the squared modulus.
Why must as for a bound particle?
Otherwise diverges and cannot equal 1 (square-integrability fails). A localized particle must have vanishing probability infinitely far away.
Why does dividing by (not ) fix normalization when ?
Because is quadratic in : scaling scales , so the total area becomes .
Why does the phase factor vanish from the probability density but still matter physically?
In it cancels (), so it never appears in position probabilities. But it encodes momentum ( via de Broglie Wavelength), which shows up in Expectation Values and interference.
Why must be single-valued?
If had two values at one point, would give two conflicting probability densities there — physically nonsensical. One point, one probability.
Why do we require (and often ) to be continuous?
A jump in would make infinite, and the Schrödinger Equation links to finite energy — so discontinuities generally demand infinite energy, which is unphysical (except at infinite potential walls).
Edge cases
Edge case: a state made of two boxes, nonzero in and , zero between. Is this legal?
Yes, provided the total . The particle can have probability spread over disconnected regions; nothing forbids gaps of zero probability.
Edge case: at some interior point (a node). Does the particle "avoid" that point?
The probability density is zero there, so finding it in an infinitesimal window around has vanishing probability. This is exactly what happens at nodes of a Particle in a Box excited state — a real, observable feature.
Edge case: is everywhere a valid wave function?
No. It gives and cannot be rescaled (dividing zero by anything stays zero). "No particle anywhere" is not a normalizable state.
Edge case: a with a finite jump discontinuity but still square-integrable — is it acceptable?
The integral may exist, but the physical conditions demand continuity (so stays finite for the Schrödinger equation). Such a is rejected as unphysical despite being square-integrable.
Edge case: does having a very tall, thin spike mean the particle "is" almost exactly there?
Only in the sense of high density. The actual probability is the spike's area (); a tall spike over a tiny width can still carry little probability. Localizing tightly in forces spread in momentum (Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle).
Recall wrap-up
Recall One-line takeaways
- Density vs probability ::: is per-length; multiply by (integrate) for a real probability.
- Normalize by ::: dividing by , since .
- Invisible thing ::: only a global phase ; position-dependent phase carries momentum.
- Illegal states ::: , non-normalizable (constant / growing), multi-valued, discontinuous.
Connections
- 2.3.08 Wave function ψ — probability density - ψ - ² (Hinglish) — parent topic (Hinglish).
- Schrödinger Equation — why continuity of and is enforced.
- Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle — spike-in- ⇒ spread-in- edge case.
- Particle in a Box — nodes, domain of integration, disconnected regions.
- de Broglie Wavelength — the in that hides in the phase.
- Complex Numbers — why .
- Expectation Values — where the "invisible" phase reappears.