The one master tool for every problem is the parent relation:
ΔxΔp≥2ℏ,ΔEΔt≥2ℏ.
"Minimum value" problems use the equality (=ℏ/2); "at least / smallest possible" also means equality. See the parent note ($\Delta x\,\Delta p\ge\hbar/2$) if a step feels unfamiliar.
These test whether you can pick the right relation and read off the answer. No modelling yet.
Recall Solution Q1
WHAT: As Δx shrinks, the floor on Δp rises.
WHY: In ΔxΔp≥ℏ/2, the right side ℏ/2 is a fixed positive number. If Δx→ small, then to keep the product ≥ℏ/2, Δp must grow at least as fast as 1/Δx.
Δp≥2Δxℏ.
Squeeze one, the other springs up — the balloon picture.
Recall Solution Q2
WHAT: Use the energy–time relation ΔEΔt≥ℏ/2.
WHY: The unknown is an energy spread; the given is a time the state exists. The lifetime τisΔt — the timescale over which the state changes appreciably (here, by decaying).
So ΔE≥ℏ/(2τ). (We compute the number in Q6.)
Momentum: minimum means equality.
Δp=2Δxℏ=2(5.0×10−11)1.055×10−34=1.055×10−24kg⋅m/s.Speed: divide by the electron mass.
Δv=meΔp=9.11×10−311.055×10−24≈1.16×106m/s.
A million metres per second of irreducible velocity spread — this is why electrons can't sit still inside atoms.
Recall Solution Q4
Δv=2mΔxℏ=2(0.16)(1.0×10−6)1.055×10−34≈3.30×10−28m/s.Comment:ℏ is tiny, m is enormous — the floor is 10−28m/s, utterly unmeasurable. Quantum fuzziness is there, just cosmically irrelevant for balls.
Recall Solution Q5
Δp:Δpmin=ℏ/(2Δx) depends only on Δx, not on mass. So equalΔp for both.
Δv:Δv=Δp/m. Same Δp, bigger mass ⇒ smaller Δv. The electron has the larger speed spread, by the factor 1836.
Lesson: confinement dictates momentum spread; mass then decides how much velocity that is.
Recall Solution Q6
ΔE=2τℏ=2(2.0×10−9)1.055×10−34≈2.64×10−26J.
Convert: 1.602×10−192.64×10−26≈1.65×10−7eV. This tiny spread is the state's natural linewidth — see Natural linewidth and spectral broadening.
Now you must set up the model: decide what Δx or Δt physically is.
Recall Solution Q7
Set-up (WHAT & WHY): Confinement means the particle is somewhere within the box, so its position spread is about the box size: Δx∼a (the width of the cyan bump in the figure). By the relation, Δp∼ℏ/(2a).
Since the box is symmetric, the average momentum is zero: ⟨p⟩=0. Then the typical momentum-squared is just the spread squared: ⟨p2⟩∼(Δp)2.
Energy: kinetic energy is p2/(2m), so
Emin∼2m(Δp)2∼8ma2ℏ2.Why it can't be zero:E=0 would need p=0 exactly, i.e. Δp=0. But then Δx≥ℏ/(2Δp)→∞ — the particle would have to be spread over all space, contradicting "trapped in the box." So the ground-state energy is forced above zero: this is the zero-point energy (compare Particle in a box).
Number (electron, a=10−10 m):Emin∼8(9.11×10−31)(10−10)2(1.055×10−34)2≈1.53×10−19J≈0.95eV.
Order-of-magnitude right for atomic energies — good.
Recall Solution Q8
Analysis: The relevant relation is ΔEΔt≥ℏ/2 with Δt=τ, the lifetime. The velocity 0.99c is a red herring — it tells you how far the muon flies, not its energy blur.
ΔE=2τℏ=2(2.2×10−6)1.055×10−34≈2.40×10−29J.
In eV: 1.602×10−192.40×10−29≈1.50×10−10eV. A famously razor-sharp energy — because the muon lives comparatively "long."
Combine the uncertainty principle with another physics idea.
Recall Solution Q9
Exact value:E1=2(9.11×10−31)(10−10)2π2(1.055×10−34)2≈6.03×10−18J≈37.6eV.Ratio:E1/Emin=ℏ2/(8ma2)π2ℏ2/(2ma2)=4π2≈39.5.Why the estimate is smaller: The uncertainty argument used the loosest bound Δx∼a and equality in ΔxΔp=ℏ/2. The real confined wavefunction has a somewhat larger effective Δp (it must vanish at both walls), so the true energy sits well above the crude floor. The uncertainty principle correctly predicts "nonzero and roughly atomic-scale," not the exact number.
Recall Solution Q10
(i)p=λh=λ2πℏ=1.0×10−102π(1.055×10−34)≈6.63×10−24kg⋅m/s.(ii) Set Δp=p and use Δx≥ℏ/(2Δp):
Δx=2pℏ=2(6.63×10−24)1.055×10−34≈7.96×10−12m≈0.080A˚.Meaning: to make the momentum spread as big as a whole de Broglie momentum, you must localize the electron to under a tenth of an ångström. Momentum spread and de Broglie momentum are two faces of the same wave nature (de Broglie wavelength).
Full modelling, conceptual judgement, and defence against a subtle wrong argument.
Recall Solution Q11
(i)ΔE=2τℏ=2(1.6×10−8)1.055×10−34≈3.30×10−27J.(ii) Rearrange ∣ΔE∣=λ2hcΔλ⇒Δλ=hcλ2ΔE:
Δλ=(6.626×10−34)(3.0×108)(589×10−9)2(3.30×10−27)≈5.76×10−15m≈5.8×10−6nm.
The spectral line is intrinsically about 6×10−6 nm wide — the natural width, before any Doppler or collision broadening (Natural linewidth and spectral broadening).
Recall Solution Q12
Verdict: Wrong. Energy is conserved exactly in quantum mechanics.
What the symbols mean:ΔE is the statistical spread of energy values you would measure on identically prepared copies of a state; Δt is the timescale over which the state changes appreciably (its lifetime). Neither is a "loan."
Where it breaks: A state that lasts only Δt is not a single sharp energy — it is a superposition whose energies are genuinely spread by ΔE≥ℏ/(2Δt). Measuring gives one value with that spread; the average is conserved and no single measurement ever shows "extra" energy appearing then vanishing. The "borrowing" phrase is a heuristic for virtual particles, not a real violation.
Recall Solution Q13
Plug in:Emin∼8mpa2ℏ2=8(1.67×10−27)(5.0×10−15)2(1.055×10−34)2≈3.33×10−14J.Convert to MeV:Emin≈1.602×10−133.33×10−14≈0.21MeV.Comment:Emin∝1/a2. A nucleus is ∼105 times smaller than an atom, so confinement energies are ∼1010 times larger — MeV instead of eV. This is why nuclear processes dwarf chemical ones: squeezing a proton into a nucleus costs an enormous zero-point energy, of the same MeV order as measured nuclear binding energies.