Worked examples — Dimensional analysis — Buckingham π theorem
2.2.26 · D3· Physics › Fluid Mechanics › Dimensional analysis — Buckingham π theorem
Yeh parent topic ka "paces se guzaaro" companion hai. Parent ne aapko recipe dikhayi. Yahan hum deliberately har tarah ki situation dhundte hain jo theorem aapke saamne rakh sakta hai — clean cases, awkward ones, traps, aur exam twists — aur har ek ko last symbol tak kaam karte hain.
Hum recipes par sirf yeh operations use karenge:
- Do quantities ko Multiply karo → unke exponents add karo ().
- Kisi power tak Raise karo → har exponent ko se multiply karo.
- Dimensionless matlab har exponent ke barabar ho.
Yahi poora algebra hai. Agar tum chhote whole numbers aur fractions add aur multiply kar sako, toh tum yeh sab kar sakte ho.
The scenario matrix
Theorem jo bhi problem aapke saamne daale, woh in case classes mein se ek mein aati hai. Har row ek distinct "shape" ki situation hai; neeche ke examples un cells ke saath label kiye gaye hain jo woh cover karte hain, taaki tum dekh sako ki kuch chhoot nahi raha.
| Cell | Case class | Kya special hai / kya galat ho sakta hai | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | Clean case, , | Textbook baseline; multiple groups | Ex 1 |
| C2 | Degenerate: ek dimension ek variable mein | Ek variable forced out ho jaata hai har group se | Ex 2 |
| C3 | Reduced rank: sirf present, | use karna hoga, "3" nahi | Ex 3 |
| C4 | Rank drop from bad repeaters | Chosen repeaters dependent hain → method fail | Ex 4 |
| C5 | Extra base dimension ( = temperature), | "Universe mein 3 dimensions hain" reflex galat hai | Ex 5 |
| C6 | : variables ek unique power law force karte hain | Koi free function nahi; law ek constant tak fix hai | Ex 6 |
| C7 | Real-world word problem → model design karo | π groups prototype aur scale model ke beech match karo | Ex 7 |
| C8 | Exam twist: fractional & negative exponents, sign care | Linear system cleanly solve karo, saare signs track karo | Ex 8 |
Ex 1 — Baseline clean case (Cell C1)
Forecast: abhi andaza lagao — kitne independent pure numbers? (Aage padhne se pehle likh lo.)
-
Sab kuch count karo. variables; base dimensions jo actually present hain woh hain , toh . Yeh step kyun? tabhi kaam karta hai jab aapko dono counts pata hon. Theorem pehle ek counting statement hai.
-
Groups ki sankhya. . Yeh step kyun? Yeh batata hai ki physics mein exactly do knobs hain — koi aur clever variable freedom add nahi kar sakta.
-
Repeaters choose karo . Yeh teen kyun? Inhe (a) milke contain karna chahiye aur (b) khud mein koi group form nahi karna chahiye. Unki recipes dekho: sirf mein hai, sirf mein hai, aur ek "spare" supply karta hai lengths fix karne ke liye. Yahi exactly woh independence hai jo chahiye — unka koi product pure number mein collapse nahi hota.
-
banao ke saath: likho aur demand karo ki har exponent zero ho.
- Yeh step kyun? Har base dimension ek equation deta hai; teen equations pin down karte hain. Isi tarah ek group forced hota hai, guess nahi.
-
banao ke saath: deta hai , toh Reynolds number phir se.
-
Law ki shape: .
Verify: Check karo ki truly dimensionless hai. . . Ratio . ✓ Aur . ✓
Ex 2 — Ek variable forced out (Cell C2)
Forecast: kya total mass answer mein appear karega? Haan ya naa guess karo.
-
Count. ; dimensions present , toh . Phir : exactly ek group. Yeh step kyun? Ek group matlab poora law hai — ek single locked-in relation.
-
dimension dekho. appear karta hai mein — teen carriers, cancel karne ke liye kaafi. Lekin dekho kya hota hai jab hum actually group banate hain.
-
Repeaters (woh carry karte hain unke beech: mein teeno hain, mein hain). Build :
- se: ( se), aur check : ✓.
-
kahan gaya? include karne ki koshish karo: . Phir ; ; — contradiction ( ek saath aur nahi ho sakta). waala koi dimensionless group exist nahi karta. Yeh step kyun? , lekin list mein koi independent length variable nahi hai. Toh ek aisi length carry karta hai jise koi cancel nahi kar sakta. Woh redundant hai — physics kabhi use nahi karti.
Verify: . ✓ Answer known string-wave speed hai. ✓
Ex 3 — Sirf length aur time bachte hain, (Cell C3)
Forecast: yahan kya hai — 3 ya 2? Aur isliye kitne groups?
-
Dimensions jo actually present hain unhe count karo. Har recipe scan karo: sirf aur dikhte hain. Toh , 3 nahi. Yeh step kyun? Rule hai = number of independent dimensions present. Blindly likhne par milega aur galat zero groups claim hoga.
-
Groups. .
-
Build (repeaters ; milke woh aur carry karte hain):
Verify: . ✓ (Full theory: ; woh exactly woh hai jo dimensions supply nahi kar sakti.)
Ex 4 — Bad repeaters method ko khatam kar dete hain (Cell C4)
Figure dekho: har repeater ek arrow hai jiske teen coordinates uske exponents par hain. "Independent repeaters" ka poora point yeh hai ki yeh teen arrows exponent space mein genuinely teen alag directions mein point karein. Neeche ke red arrows woh karne se mana kar dete hain.

Forecast: student expect karta hai 2 groups banana. Woh actually kitne independently bana sakta hai?
-
Repeaters ke exponent vectors likho par:
- :
- :
- : Yeh step kyun? Independence in vectors ke baare mein ek statement hai: woh ek doosre mein flattenable nahi hone chahiye.
-
Independence test karo. Koi bhi carry nahi karta — pehla coordinate teeno ke liye hai. Toh yeh teen plane mein poori tarah rehte hain. Teen vectors ek 2-dimensional plane mein thuse hue independent nahi ho sakte (figure mein red arrows dekho, sab same grey plane mein pade hain, toh ek doosron ka combination hai). Yeh step kyun? Repeater sub-matrix ka rank ab hai. Uska determinant hai, toh woh invertible nahi hai — tum exponents uniquely solve nahi kar sakte.
-
Dikhao ki determinant zero hai explicitly. ke exponent columns rows par stack karo: kyunki poori top row zero hai. Zero determinant rank confirm karta hai. Yeh step kyun? "Kya mere repeaters independent hain?" ka clean numerical test hai: unka exponent matrix banao aur check karo.
-
Consequence. Rank repeaters se tum sirf 2 constraints impose kar sakte ho, 3 nahi. Aur buri baat, woh koi carry hi nahi karte, toh ya (jo dono carry karte hain) wale koi bhi group mass mein balance karna impossible hai. Method silently ek poora dimension kho deta hai.
-
Fix. Valid choice use karo (parent Ex 1). Uska exponent matrix rows , columns par, hai toh woh repeaters independent hain aur method kaam karta hai.
Verify: bad-repeater determinant (dependent), good-repeater determinant (independent). Dono is page ke neeche numerically checked hain.
Ex 5 — Ek chautha base dimension aata hai (Cell C5)
Forecast: "universe mein 3 dimensions hain" reflex se aap bologe . Kya yahan yeh sahi hai?
-
Base dimensions count karo jo present hain. Ab sab appear karte hain → , 3 nahi. Yeh step kyun? ignore karne par groups ek se zyada count hote aur galat physics milti.
-
Variables. . Toh . Yeh step kyun? Do groups: exactly wo number of knobs jo convection mein hain.
-
Repeaters choose karo (chaar repeaters kyunki ). Check karo ki woh dimensions span karte hain: sirf freely carry karta hai, supply karta hai, ek spare supply karta hai, aur ka ek clean source hai. Woh independent hain. Yeh step kyun? ke saath hamein chaar repeaters chahiye, usual teen se ek zyada.
-
Group with : demand karo dimensionless ho. match karne par milta hai, toh Yeh step kyun? aur same signature carry karte hain; sirf unke length powers ek se differ karte hain, aur woh gap close karta hai.
-
Group with : demand karo dimensionless ho. Matching deta hai , toh Reynolds number aur Prandtl number ka product (product mein cancel ho jaata hai, isliye viscosity ko separately list nahi karna pada).
-
Law ki shape: — heat transfer sirf inhi do knobs ke through flow aur fluid par depend karta hai.
Verify: ✓ (dimensionless). Aur ✓. Dono neeche numerically checked hain.
Ex 6 — Ek group ek unique power law force karta hai (Cell C6)
Forecast: kitne free dimensionless groups hain — aur sirf ek group hone ka law ki freedom ke liye kya matlab hai?
-
Count. Play mein variables: toh . Present dimensions: sirf , toh . Phir . Yeh step kyun? Ek group matlab koi free function nahi ek aur argument ki — law ek single constant tak fix hai. (Drag case se compare karo, jahan do groups ek poori function experiment se determine karne ke liye chhodti hain.)
-
Group banao :
- Yeh step kyun? Ek group ek constant set karne se, poori functional form fix ho jaati hai — dimensions akele dete hain . Guess karne ke liye sirf woh ek pure number bachta hai.
-
"Few groups" ka lesson. Jitne kam groups, utna zyada dimensions jawab dictate karte hain. Ek group → unique power law; aur agar kabhi mile (koi group nahi), toh yeh signal hai ki tumhare variables dimensionlessly combine nahi kar sakte — warning ki ek variable missing hai.
Verify: . ✓
Ex 7 — Real-world design: ek scale model (Cell C7)

Forecast: kya model real sub se slower ya faster jaayega? Compute karne se pehle guess karo.
-
Similarity condition. sirf ki function hai. Prototype ka flow reproduce karne ke liye ek governing group match karo: . Yeh step kyun? Equal π groups ⇒ equal dimensionless physics ⇒ model prototype ko faithfully reproduce karta hai. Yahi Model testing and similarity action mein hai.
-
solve karo. Same fluid ⇒ same , toh equality reduce hoti hai mein: Yeh step kyun? chhota model fixed rakhne ke liye speed maangta hai — chhota size tez jaane se "pura" hota hai.
-
Drag scale karo. match hone par, model aur prototype ke liye equal hai, toh same aur same ke saath. Isliye Remarkably, : model par measure ki gayi drag real submarine ki drag ke barabar hai. Yeh step kyun? fixed rakhne par bhi fix hota hai, toh is same-fluid matching ke under dono forces exactly coincide karte hain. Engineer model ki drag seedha prototype ki drag ke roop mein read karti hai.
Verify: m/s (checked). kyunki (checked). Force ratio (checked). Sab neeche.
Ex 8 — Exam twist: fractional & negative exponents (Cell C8)
Forecast: mein ki power guess karo solve karne se pehle.
-
Count. ; dimensions present, . Toh : ek group, ek locked law. Yeh step kyun? Ek group phir se matlab hai poori form ek constant tak fix hai (jise Taylor ne baad mein paya).
-
Build aur har exponent zero set karo, signs carefully track karo:
- Yeh step kyun? Teen base dimensions → teen equations → linear system solve karo ke liye.
-
Solve. se: . mein daalo: . Phir , aur se: . Rearrange karo: Yeh step kyun? isolate karne par fractional powers invert hote hain; par ka negative upar aa jaata hai ban ke jab hum solve karte hain ke liye.
-
Signs ki sanity. Badi energy (positive power ) → bada blast: correct. Dense air (negative power ) → chhota blast: correct, bhaari air resist karti hai.
Verify: ✓ (matches ). Exponents neeche checked hain.
Recall Ek-line self-test
Ek problem mein variables hain jo use karte hain, chaaon independent. Kitne π groups? .
Recall
Pipe pressure drop ke liye π groups ki sankhya ()
String-wave law se mass kyun gayab ho jaata hai?
Deep-water gravity wave () ke liye kya hai?
Valid repeaters ka test
Temperature ke saath convection (, dims ) → kitne groups aur kya hain?
Same-fluid submarine test ke liye model similarity rule
Blast-wave radius law dimensions se
Connections
- Reynolds number — Ex 1, 4, 7 mein master group ke roop mein phir aata hai
- Drag force and drag coefficient — Ex 7 use karta hai
- Model testing and similarity — Ex 7 is ka worked instance hai
- Dimensional homogeneity — har "Verify" line ek homogeneity check hai
- Fundamental and derived units — basis har recipe ke peeche
- Navier–Stokes equations — jahan se rigorously aata hai