Before you can read a single line of the parent topic, you need the alphabet it silently assumes. This page builds every symbol from nothing, in an order where each one leans only on the ones before it.
Why do we need this idea first? Because the whole topic is a fight between two questions: what happens to a chosen blob? versus what happens at a chosen place? Without a clear notion of "blob," neither question is meaningful.
Look at the amber speck in the figure. It has a definite position at each instant, and it moves. That single moving speck is the hero of the Lagrangian viewpoint. The white grid of fixed watch-points behind it is the Eulerian viewpoint.
Why invent a separate label? Because a particle moves, so its current position x keeps changing and can't serve as a name. Its starting position never changes — a perfect permanent name tag.
Why does time get two symbols? One (t0) sets the naming convention; the other (t) is the running variable we differentiate against. Keeping them separate stops you from confusing "when I named it" with "when I'm watching it."
Why do we bother splitting v into u,v,w? Because instruments and equations work one direction at a time. When the parent writes u∂ϕ/∂x+v∂ϕ/∂y+w∂ϕ/∂z, it is adding up the change caused by motion in each of the three directions separately.
Why is this the Eulerian language? Because the position x here is an input you choose freely — you are asking "what's happening at this fixed spot?", not "what's happening to this particle?". Different particles pass through the same spot at different times.
Why a partial, not an ordinary, derivative? Because a field depends on four things (x,y,z,t). Asking "how does it change?" is ambiguous until you say which knob you're turning. Each partial turns exactly one knob.
∂t∂ϕ (space frozen) = how the field changes at one fixed spot as time passes → the Eulerian / local rate.
∂x∂ϕ (time & other axes frozen) = how the field varies as you slide sideways in space → needed for the convective term.
Why this exact combination — velocity dotted with the gradient? Because it measures how fast ϕ changes as you ride along in the direction the particle is actually moving. The gradient says "which way ϕ climbs and how steeply"; the velocity says "which way and how fast I'm going." Their dot product is the rate of change ϕ delivers to a traveller moving with v. That is precisely the "moving into a different region" effect the parent calls convective.
Why a brand-new symbol instead of reusing ∂/∂t or d/dt? Because none of the old ones say "hold the particle label fixed while time runs." ∂/∂t holds position fixed (wrong — the particle moves); a plain d/dt is ambiguous about what's held. The capital D is a deliberate flag: you are riding the particle. Every symbol on the right-hand side was built in sections 5 and 6 — nothing new is smuggled in.