Exercises — Torque-free rotation — Euler's equations, asymmetric top
Quick toolbox we will lean on the whole way down (every symbol is earned in the parent, restated here so you never have to leave):
Related depth lives in Inertia tensor and principal axes, Stability analysis and linearization, and Symmetric top and gyroscopic precession.
Level 1 — Recognition
Problem 1.1
A rigid body has (a uniform ball). It is spun with and released with no external torque. What is at that instant?
Recall Solution 1.1
WHAT to notice: all three moments are equal. Look at each Euler equation — every right-hand side carries a difference of moments like . When all are equal, every such difference is zero. and identically . Answer: . The spin never changes — a sphere has no wobble because there is no moment-difference to couple the axes.
Problem 1.2
For a body with , which single principal axis, if spun about, is unstable? Just name it.
Recall Solution 1.2
Order the moments: smallest is , largest is , intermediate is . The tennis-racket theorem says rotation about the intermediate axis is unstable. Answer: axis 2 (the axis).
Level 2 — Application
Problem 2.1
A symmetric top has and . It spins with . Find the body precession rate (the rate at which rotate around axis 3).
Recall Solution 2.1
WHY this works: with , Euler's third equation gives , so is frozen. The first two equations then read This is uniform circular motion of the pair . Answer: — sweeps a cone about axis 3 fifteen radians per second.
Problem 2.2
Body with at an instant has . Compute and and state their values at all later times.
Recall Solution 2.2
Plug straight into the conserved scalars. WHY constant: we proved (the moment-differences telescope) and is fixed in space so cannot change. Both hold for all time. Answer: , , forever.
Level 3 — Analysis
Problem 3.1
For , a body spins nearly about axis 1 with . Compute the stability constant and the oscillation frequency of small disturbances.
Recall Solution 3.1
Spinning about axis 1, the "other two" are . The linearised equation is with Because , write so the solution is : it oscillates, hence stable. Answer: , small wobbles oscillate at — axis 1 (smallest ) is stable. ✅
Problem 3.2
Same body, but spin nearly about axis 2 with . Compute and the exponential growth rate; how long until a disturbance grows by a factor ?
Recall Solution 3.2
Now the "other two" are : Positive means the solution is — exponential growth, unstable. The growth rate is Answer: , e-folding time — axis 2 (intermediate ) is unstable. ❌ This is the Dzhanibekov flip.

Level 4 — Synthesis
Problem 4.1
A body with starts at (pure spin about axis 3). Show that if instead it starts at with tiny , the trajectory of stays on a thin closed loop, and find the wobble frequency about axis 3.
Recall Solution 4.1
Strategy: axis 3 is the largest here, so we expect stability (closed loop). Confirm by linearising: keep constant, small. Differentiate the first, substitute the second: ⇒ oscillation, so traces a small ellipse (a polhode loop) around axis 3 — it never runs away, confirming a thin closed loop. Wobble frequency: Answer: stable closed loop, wobble frequency . The two conserved surfaces and intersect in a tight closed polhode near axis 3.
Problem 4.2
For the symmetric top of Problem 2.1 (), the transverse spin has amplitude . Find (a) the half-angle of the cone sweeps about axis 3 in the body frame, and (b) the conserved .
Recall Solution 4.2
(a) The spin vector makes angle with axis 3 where Why ? On the right triangle whose legs are (side opposite the tilt) and (side adjacent, along the axis), tangent = opposite/adjacent is exactly the ratio that encodes how far tips from the axis. (b) With and : Answer: (a) ; (b) .
Level 5 — Mastery
Problem 5.1
A body has . It is given and (the state from Problem 2.2). The separatrix — the borderline polhode that passes through the unstable axis 2 — occurs when . Check whether this exact state sits on the separatrix, above it (energy ellipsoid encloses axis 3), or below it (encloses axis 1), and interpret physically.
Recall Solution 5.1
Strategy — the ratio acts like an "effective ". Compute it and compare to the moments. This lies between and . Interpretation: because , the intersection of the two ellipsoids is a polhode that loops around axis 3 (the largest- axis), not around axis 2. So this state is on the stable side, wrapping the large axis. Separatrix would require exactly, i.e. . We have , so we are not on the separatrix; we are safely above it (axis-3 loop). Answer: lies between and ⇒ polhode encircles axis 3, stable side; separatrix value would be .
Problem 5.2
Design check (Dzhanibekov timer). A wingnut in space is modelled as , tossed spinning about the unstable axis 2 at with an unavoidable seed disturbance . Estimate how long until the disturbance reaches (roughly "flip-scale"). Use the linear growth .
Recall Solution 5.2
Step 1 — growth rate. For axis 2: Step 2 — invert the exponential. We need : Why the log? The exponential growth answers "how big after time "; taking the natural log inverts it — it answers the reverse question "how long to reach a given size". That is exactly what undoes. Answer: roughly from toss to visible flip — the wingnut tumbles within a second, matching the famous ISS footage.
Recall Self-test index (close the page, answer from memory)
Which axis is unstable and why ::: The intermediate- axis, because the product is positive there, giving and exponential growth. What two scalars are conserved in torque-free motion ::: and . Formula for symmetric-top body precession rate ::: . Why is not constant even with zero torque ::: Because is conserved, not ; a lopsided (non-sphere) makes constant force a moving .