Before we start, meet the two reference pictures we lean on again and again.
Figure s01 — left panel: a straight blue wire on the y-axis with current I pointing up; a red field point P sits a perpendicular distance a to the right, and the green ring-with-dot shows B coming out of the page there (positive by our convention). Right panel: an orange circular loop with current I; the field at its red centre is set by the radius R. These are the two closed forms μ0I/2πa and μ0I/2R you will reach for constantly.
Figure s01 — the infinite straight wire (left) and the circular-loop centre (right): the two closed-form fields, with the out-of-page positive direction marked in green.
Figure s02 — a finite blue wire drawn vertically; a red field point P sits a perpendicular distance a from it. The dashed grey segment is that perpendicular, and its foot on the wire is the grey dot. From P, an orange line runs to the top end and a green line to the bottom end; the angles those lines make with the perpendicular are θ1 (orange) and θ2 (green). Those two angles are exactly what the finite-wire formula needs.
Figure s02 — how θ1 and θ2 are measured: from the perpendicular foot out to each end of the wire.
WHAT: Recognise "very long straight wire" ⇒ use B=2πaμ0I.
WHY: The wire is stated infinite and we want field at a perpendicular distance — that is exactly the closed form we derived, so no integration is needed.
B=2πaμ0I=2π(0.10)(4π×10−7)(5)=0.102×10−7×5=1.0×10−5T.
(Tidy trick: 2πμ0=2×10−7, so B=2×10−7⋅aI.)
Answer:B=1.0×10−5T=10μT.
Recall Solution
WHAT: Centre of a loop ⇒ B=2Rμ0I.
WHY: At the centre every element is the same distance R away and all dB point along the axis in the same direction, giving the clean μ0I/2R.
B=2(0.05)(4π×10−7)(2)=0.104π×10−7×2=2.51×10−5T.Answer:B≈2.51×10−5T=25.1μT.
WHAT: Finite wire ⇒ B=4πaμ0I(sinθ1+sinθ2).
WHY: The wire is not infinite, so we cannot use μ0I/2πa. Because P faces the midpoint, the two ends are symmetric: θ1=θ2.
Geometry (Figure s02 shows exactly these angles): each end is a horizontal distance L/2=0.10m from the foot, at perpendicular distance a=0.05. The angle to an end, measured from the foot, has
sinθ=a2+(L/2)2L/2=0.052+0.1020.10=0.01250.10=0.11180.10=0.894.
So sinθ1+sinθ2=2(0.894)=1.789.
B=4πaμ0I(1.789)=10−7⋅0.053⋅1.789=10−7⋅60⋅1.789=1.07×10−5T.Answer:B≈1.07×10−5T.
Recall Solution
WHAT: On-axis ⇒ B=2(R2+x2)3/2μ0IR2.
WHY: Off-centre on the axis, the dB vectors tilt; only their axial components survive (the radial ones cancel by symmetry), and that projection is what turns μ0I/2R into this R2/(R2+x2)3/2 form.
Here R2=0.01, R2+x2=0.02, (0.02)3/2=0.020.02=0.02×0.1414=2.83×10−3.
B=2(2.83×10−3)(4π×10−7)(4)(0.01)=5.66×10−3(4π×10−7)(0.04).
Numerator =4π×10−7×0.04=5.027×10−8. Divide: B=8.89×10−6T.
Answer:B≈8.89×10−6T.
WHAT: Superpose two infinite-wire fields at the midpoint, each at distance a=d/2=0.05m.
WHY & direction: Apply the right-hand rule (restated at the top) to each wire at the midpoint. Draw both currents pointing up: the midpoint is to the right of wire 1 (so its field is out of the page, +) and to the left of wire 2 (so its field is into the page, −). With out-of-page as positive, the two signed fields are +B1 and −B2 — they subtract.
Each magnitude: B1=B2=2πaμ0I=2×10−7⋅0.0510=4.0×10−5T.
Net =+B1−B2=0.
Answer:Bnet=0T. (Equal, opposite ⇒ perfect cancellation at the midpoint.)
Recall Solution
WHAT: Same two magnitudes, but reverse one current.
WHY: Reversing I2 flips its field's sign at the midpoint (right-hand rule): it was −B2, now it is +B2. So both signed fields are now out of the page (+) — they add.
Bnet=+B1+B2=4.0×10−5+4.0×10−5=8.0×10−5T (out of page).Answer:Bnet=8.0×10−5T.
Recall Solution
WHAT: A full loop gives μ0I/2R; a semicircle is exactly half the arc, so half the field.
WHY: At the centre every arc element sits at distance R with θ=90∘ and all dB are parallel (all out of the page, by the right-hand rule). The field is proportional to arc length; a semicircle has half the arc length of the full loop. (The straight radial leads contribute nothing: for them dl∥r^, so sinθ=0.)
B=21⋅2Rμ0I=4Rμ0I=4(0.08)(4π×10−7)(6)=0.327.54×10−6=2.36×10−5T.Answer:B≈2.36×10−5T.
WHAT: Treat each side as a finite wire and use 4πaμ0I(sinθ1+sinθ2); all four contributions are equal and same-signed, so multiply one by 4.
WHY: No single stock formula fits a square, but its sides are just four finite wires — decompose, then superpose. By the right-hand rule, walking the current around the square makes all four dB point the same way (out of the page) at the centre, so all four signs agree.
Geometry for one side: the centre is at perpendicular distance a=s/2=0.10m from each side. The perpendicular foot lands at the side's midpoint, so each end is s/2 away along the wire:
sinθ1=sinθ2=(s/2)2+(s/2)2s/2=21=0.707.
One side: B1=4πaμ0I(2⋅0.707)=10−7⋅0.105⋅1.414=7.07×10−6T.
Four sides: B=4B1=2.83×10−5T.Answer:B≈2.83×10−5T.
Sanity check: a circle of radius R=s/2=0.10 would give μ0I/2R=3.14×10−5 — a bit larger than the square, as expected (the square's far corners are further away). ✔
Recall Solution
WHAT: Two on-axis loop fields, each at x=0.10, both pointing the same way ⇒ add.
WHY: Same-sense currents give same-direction (same-sign) axial fields at the midpoint, so we double one on-axis result.
One loop: R2=0.01, R2+x2=0.02, (0.02)3/2=2.828×10−3.
B1=2(R2+x2)3/2μ0IR2=2(2.828×10−3)(4π×10−7)(3)(0.01)=5.657×10−33.77×10−8=6.66×10−6T.
Total B=2B1=1.33×10−5T.Answer:B≈1.33×10−5T.
WHAT: Finite wire, but P is not opposite the middle — the two angles differ.
WHY: We keep the general 4πaμ0I(sinθ1+sinθ2), but must compute each θ from its own right triangle. This is the fully general case that includes a zero angle.
Lower end (y=0): the foot of the perpendicular is at this end, so the line to it is perpendicular to the wire ⇒ angle from foot =0 ⇒ sinθ1=0.
Upper end (y=0.30): horizontal offset 0.30, so
sinθ2=0.102+0.3020.30=0.100.30=0.31620.30=0.9487.B=4πaμ0I(0+0.9487)=10−7⋅0.108⋅0.9487=10−7⋅80⋅0.9487=7.59×10−6T.Answer:B≈7.59×10−6T.
Case note: if P were opposite the middle, both angles would be equal and non-zero — the L2 case. If the wire extended to y=+∞, sinθ2→1 and, with sinθ1=0, we'd get exactly half the infinite-wire field, 4πaμ0I — the "field from a semi-infinite wire at its end." ✔
Recall Solution
WHAT: Set BcentreBaxis(x)=21 and solve for x.
WHY: This tests whether you can manipulate the on-axis form symbolically rather than plug numbers.
μ0I/(2R)μ0IR2/[2(R2+x2)3/2]=(R2+x2)3/2R3=21.
Raise both sides to the 2/3 power: R2+x2R2=(21)2/3=2−2/3.
So R2+x2=R222/3, giving x2=R2(22/3−1) and
x=R22/3−1≈0.766R.Answer:x≈0.766R. (For R=0.10m, x≈0.0766m.)
Recall Solution
WHAT: Take the limit x≫R in B=2(R2+x2)3/2μ0IR2.
WHY: Limiting behaviour reveals the loop's far-field identity — this is where Biot–Savart meets the Magnetic Dipole Moment.
Step 1 — drop the small term. When x≫R, the R2 inside the bracket is negligible next to x2, so (R2+x2)3/2≈(x2)3/2=x3. Substituting:
B≈2x3μ0IR2.
This already shows the promised B∝1/x3 falloff — far away, the field dies faster than a straight wire's 1/a or a point charge's 1/r2.
Step 2 — rewrite in dipole form. Multiply top and bottom to expose μ0/4π and the loop's area πR2:
B≈2x3μ0IR2=4πμ0⋅x32(IπR2)=4πμ0⋅x32m,m=IπR2.Step 3 — read the result. The quantity m=IπR2 is the magnetic dipole moment: current times enclosed area. The far-field is B=2πμ0x3m, the textbook axial dipole field. So a small current loop, viewed from far away, is indistinguishable from a bar-magnet-like dipole. ✔
Answer:B→2πμ0x3m with m=IπR2.