1.8.22 · D4Electromagnetism

Exercises — Biot-Savart law — magnetic field from current element

2,781 words13 min readBack to topic

Before we start, meet the two reference pictures we lean on again and again.

Figure s01left panel: a straight blue wire on the -axis with current pointing up; a red field point sits a perpendicular distance to the right, and the green ring-with-dot shows coming out of the page there (positive by our convention). Right panel: an orange circular loop with current ; the field at its red centre is set by the radius . These are the two closed forms and you will reach for constantly.

Figure — Biot-Savart law — magnetic field from current element
Figure s01 — the infinite straight wire (left) and the circular-loop centre (right): the two closed-form fields, with the out-of-page positive direction marked in green.

Figure s02 — a finite blue wire drawn vertically; a red field point sits a perpendicular distance from it. The dashed grey segment is that perpendicular, and its foot on the wire is the grey dot. From , an orange line runs to the top end and a green line to the bottom end; the angles those lines make with the perpendicular are (orange) and (green). Those two angles are exactly what the finite-wire formula needs.

Figure — Biot-Savart law — magnetic field from current element
Figure s02 — how and are measured: from the perpendicular foot out to each end of the wire.


Level 1 — Recognition

Recall Solution

WHAT: Recognise "very long straight wire" ⇒ use . WHY: The wire is stated infinite and we want field at a perpendicular distance — that is exactly the closed form we derived, so no integration is needed. (Tidy trick: , so .) Answer: .

Recall Solution

WHAT: Centre of a loop ⇒ . WHY: At the centre every element is the same distance away and all point along the axis in the same direction, giving the clean . Answer: .


Level 2 — Application

Recall Solution

WHAT: Finite wire ⇒ . WHY: The wire is not infinite, so we cannot use . Because faces the midpoint, the two ends are symmetric: . Geometry (Figure s02 shows exactly these angles): each end is a horizontal distance from the foot, at perpendicular distance . The angle to an end, measured from the foot, has So . Answer: .

Recall Solution

WHAT: On-axis ⇒ . WHY: Off-centre on the axis, the vectors tilt; only their axial components survive (the radial ones cancel by symmetry), and that projection is what turns into this form. Here , , . Numerator . Divide: . Answer: .


Level 3 — Analysis

Recall Solution

WHAT: Superpose two infinite-wire fields at the midpoint, each at distance . WHY & direction: Apply the right-hand rule (restated at the top) to each wire at the midpoint. Draw both currents pointing up: the midpoint is to the right of wire 1 (so its field is out of the page, ) and to the left of wire 2 (so its field is into the page, ). With out-of-page as positive, the two signed fields are and — they subtract. Each magnitude: Net . Answer: . (Equal, opposite ⇒ perfect cancellation at the midpoint.)

Recall Solution

WHAT: Same two magnitudes, but reverse one current. WHY: Reversing flips its field's sign at the midpoint (right-hand rule): it was , now it is . So both signed fields are now out of the page () — they add. Answer: .

Recall Solution

WHAT: A full loop gives ; a semicircle is exactly half the arc, so half the field. WHY: At the centre every arc element sits at distance with and all are parallel (all out of the page, by the right-hand rule). The field is proportional to arc length; a semicircle has half the arc length of the full loop. (The straight radial leads contribute nothing: for them , so .) Answer: .


Level 4 — Synthesis

Recall Solution

WHAT: Treat each side as a finite wire and use ; all four contributions are equal and same-signed, so multiply one by 4. WHY: No single stock formula fits a square, but its sides are just four finite wires — decompose, then superpose. By the right-hand rule, walking the current around the square makes all four point the same way (out of the page) at the centre, so all four signs agree. Geometry for one side: the centre is at perpendicular distance from each side. The perpendicular foot lands at the side's midpoint, so each end is away along the wire: One side: Four sides: Answer: . Sanity check: a circle of radius would give — a bit larger than the square, as expected (the square's far corners are further away). ✔

Recall Solution

WHAT: Two on-axis loop fields, each at , both pointing the same way ⇒ add. WHY: Same-sense currents give same-direction (same-sign) axial fields at the midpoint, so we double one on-axis result. One loop: , , . Total Answer: .


Level 5 — Mastery

Recall Solution

WHAT: Finite wire, but is not opposite the middle — the two angles differ. WHY: We keep the general , but must compute each from its own right triangle. This is the fully general case that includes a zero angle. Lower end (): the foot of the perpendicular is at this end, so the line to it is perpendicular to the wire ⇒ angle from foot . Upper end (): horizontal offset , so Answer: . Case note: if were opposite the middle, both angles would be equal and non-zero — the L2 case. If the wire extended to , and, with , we'd get exactly half the infinite-wire field, — the "field from a semi-infinite wire at its end." ✔

Recall Solution

WHAT: Set and solve for . WHY: This tests whether you can manipulate the on-axis form symbolically rather than plug numbers. Raise both sides to the power: So , giving and Answer: . (For , .)

Recall Solution

WHAT: Take the limit in . WHY: Limiting behaviour reveals the loop's far-field identity — this is where Biot–Savart meets the Magnetic Dipole Moment. Step 1 — drop the small term. When , the inside the bracket is negligible next to , so . Substituting: This already shows the promised falloff — far away, the field dies faster than a straight wire's or a point charge's . Step 2 — rewrite in dipole form. Multiply top and bottom to expose and the loop's area : Step 3 — read the result. The quantity is the magnetic dipole moment: current times enclosed area. The far-field is , the textbook axial dipole field. So a small current loop, viewed from far away, is indistinguishable from a bar-magnet-like dipole. ✔ Answer: with .


Connections

  • Ampère's Law — a faster route to the infinite-wire and solenoid fields used above.
  • Magnetic Field of a Solenoid — stack many loops like L4·Q2.
  • Magnetic Dipole Moment — the far-field of L5·Q3.
  • Right-Hand Rule — decides every sign in L1–L4.
  • Coulomb's Law — the electric analogue to contrast.
  • Lorentz Force — what these fields do to moving charges next.