Can you pick the right formula and read off signs/directions?
Recall Solution L1·1
WHAT we use: the field of a point charge, E=r2k∣q∣.
WHY this formula: a single isolated point charge is exactly the case Coulomb's law was built for; dividing the Coulomb force by the test charge left E=k∣q∣/r2.
Plug in (3.0nC=3.0×10−9C, 2.0cm=0.020m):
E=(0.020)2(8.99×109)(3.0×10−9)=4.0×10−426.97≈6.74×104N/C.Direction:q is positive, so E points radially outward, away from the origin.
Recall Solution L1·2
WHAT:E=r2kqr^, where r^ points from the source to the field point — here that is the +x direction.
WHY the sign matters: with q negative, r2kq is a negative number times r^, so E points opposite to r^ — i.e. back toward the charge, in the −x direction.
What it looks like: field lines enter a negative charge, so at any nearby point the arrow points inward. ✓
Plug numbers into a multi-step but still single-idea calculation.
Recall Solution L2·1
WHAT: once you know E, the force on any charge is F=QE.
WHY this is one line: the field already packaged everything about the sources; the charge just responds.
∣F∣=∣−e∣E=(1.6×10−19)(2.0×104)=3.2×10−15N.Direction:Q=−e is negative, so F points opposite to E → in the −x direction.
Recall Solution L2·2
WHAT we need: a point where the two fields have equal magnitude and opposite direction so they cancel.
WHY between them: between two positive charges the field from the left one points right, from the right one points left — only here can they oppose and cancel.
Let the null point be at distance x from +q, so it is d−x from +4q. Set magnitudes equal:
x2kq=(d−x)2k(4q)⇒x21=(d−x)24.
Take the square root (both sides positive):
x1=d−x2⇒d−x=2x⇒x=3d.What it looks like: the null sits closer to the smaller charge — makes sense, you must stand near the weaker charge for its field to keep up with the stronger one.
Now the geometry does the work — components and symmetry.
Recall Solution L3·1
Step 1 — distance (look at the triangle in the figure). Each charge is a distance r=a2+y2 from the field point (Pythagoras on the right triangle with legs a and y). So each field has magnitude E1=a2+y2kq.
Step 2 — components (WHY symmetry helps). The two charges mirror each other across the y-axis. Their horizontal parts Ex point in opposite directions and cancel; their vertical parts both point +y and add. The vertical fraction is cosθ=a2+y2y — the "adjacent over hypotenuse" of that same triangle.
Step 3 — total.Ey=2E1cosθ=a2+y22kq⋅a2+y2y=(a2+y2)3/22kqy.
The 3/2 power: one full power of r2 from Coulomb, plus half a power from the projection cosθ.
Numbers (q=2.0×10−9, a=0.03, y=0.04, so a2+y2=0.0025m2, (a2+y2)3/2=1.25×10−4):
Ey=1.25×10−42(8.99×109)(2.0×10−9)(0.04)≈1.15×104N/C,pointing +y.
Recall Solution L3·2
What changed: with one charge negative, the vertical parts now cancel and the horizontal parts add (both point in −x). We project with cosϕ=a2+y2a (the other leg of the triangle).
E=2E1cosϕ=a2+y22kq⋅a2+y2a=(a2+y2)3/22kqa,along −x.
This is the Electric Dipole result; defining p=2qa, far away it becomes E→y3kp.
Combine superposition, limits, and physical reasoning.
Recall Solution L4·1
WHAT the limit does: when y≫a, the a2 inside (a2+y2)3/2 is negligible next to y2, so (a2+y2)3/2→(y2)3/2=y3.
Ey→y32kqy=y22kq=y2k(2q).WHY this is exactly right: from far away the two charges blur into one blob of total charge 2q — you can no longer resolve the ±a separation. The inverse-square law of a single charge re-emerges.
Number at y=1.0m: E≈1.02(8.99×109)(4.0×10−9)≈36N/C.
Recall Solution L4·2
E→y32kqa=y3kp,p=2qa.WHY steeper: the total charge of a dipole is zero. From far away the +q and −qnearly cancel, so the leading 1/y2 term vanishes. What survives is only the tiny effect of their separation2a — a second-order leftover that decays one power faster, 1/y3.
What it looks like: the field lines of a dipole loop tightly from + to −; far out there are almost none, because the outgoing lines from +q are captured by −q nearby.
Step 1 — chop the ring (Continuous charge, look at the figure). Split the ring into tiny pieces dq. Each piece is a distance r=a2+z2 from the axial point (Pythagoras: leg a from centre to the piece, leg z along the axis). Each produces a field dE=a2+z2kdq. This is Continuous Charge Distributions + Superposition Principle working together.
Step 2 — symmetry kills the sideways parts. For every piece there is an opposite piece across the ring. Their components perpendicular to the axis cancel; only the axial component survives. The axial fraction is cosθ=a2+z2z.
dEz=a2+z2kdq⋅a2+z2z=(a2+z2)3/2kzdq.
Step 3 — add up (integrate). Everything multiplying dq is the same for every piece (all pieces share the same r and z), so ∫dq=Q:
Ez=(a2+z2)3/2kQzdirected along the axis.
Far-field check (z≫a): (a2+z2)3/2→z3, so Ez→z3kQz=z2kQ — a point charge Q, as it must be. ✓
Centre check (z=0): Ez=0 — at the exact centre every piece's field is cancelled by its opposite. ✓
Recall One-line summary of the ladder
Recognise the point-charge formula → apply F=QE and find nulls → analyse with components and symmetry → synthesise via far-field limits → master the continuous ring by chop-project-add.