1.7.24 · D4Thermodynamics

Exercises — Entropy and disorder — Boltzmann S = k·ln(W)

2,368 words11 min readBack to topic

Reference tools you will reuse

Figure — Entropy and disorder — Boltzmann S = k·ln(W)

Level 1 — Recognition

(Can you name the pieces and plug in?)

L1.1

State the value and SI units of the Boltzmann constant , and give the entropy of a macrostate that has exactly one microstate ().

Recall Solution

(joules per kelvin). For : . A unique state (only one way to build it) carries zero entropy — this is the seed of the Third Law of Thermodynamics.

L1.2

A macrostate has multiplicity . Compute its entropy in J/K.

Recall Solution

Here because . This is the "2 heads out of 4 coins" macrostate from the parent note.

L1.3

Which macrostate has higher entropy: one with microstates or one with ? By how much does differ?

Recall Solution

The one is higher (more ). The difference is Note: jumped by a factor of , but only rose by — a tiny additive bump, not a tenfold one.


Level 2 — Application

(Plug the counting into the formula end to end.)

L2.1

Toss distinguishable coins. Find the multiplicity of the macrostate "exactly 3 heads," then its entropy.

Recall Solution

We used because we are choosing which 3 of the 5 coins show heads — an unordered selection.

L2.2

molecules sit in a volume . A partition is removed so each molecule can now roam a volume . Find the entropy change (as a multiple of ), and its value in J/K.

Recall Solution

Each molecule independently gains twice as many position-states, so (position choices multiply across independent molecules — see Free Expansion of an Ideal Gas). Numerically .

L2.3

For the same setup, what is per molecule? Confirm it is independent of .

Recall Solution

It is constant because each molecule contributes the same factor of 2 to , and turns that product into a sum of equal terms . This is why entropy is extensive (scales with size ).


Level 3 — Analysis

(Multi-step reasoning; compare and interpret.)

L3.1

For coins, tabulate for . Which macrostate is most probable, and what fraction of the total microstates does it own?

Recall Solution

Total microstates . ✓ Most probable macrostate: (two heads), with . Fraction . The peaked middle wins because it has the most ways — the seed of the Second Law re-read as "drift to the biggest pile."

Figure — Entropy and disorder — Boltzmann S = k·ln(W)

L3.2

Two independent systems have and . Find the combined , then verify explicitly that .

Recall Solution

Multiplicities multiply: . Separately: ✓ Numerically , so . The additivity is exactly the property — this is why the logarithm was chosen (see Microstates and Macrostates).

L3.3

Ice melts to water. Suppose each molecule gains a factor of in accessible arrangements. For one mole (), find .

Recall Solution

, so using . Positive, as it must be: liquid has far more accessible microstates than the locked-in crystal.


Level 4 — Synthesis

(Stitch several ideas together.)

L4.1

Show that the statistical result for free expansion of one mole to double volume equals the classical thermodynamic value, and give the number in J/(mol·K).

Recall Solution

Statistical: . This is exactly the value obtained from Clausius Entropy dS = dQ_rev / T by integrating along a reversible isothermal expansion from to (). Statistical and thermodynamic entropy agree — the whole point of .

L4.2

A biased situation: you have distinguishable coins. Compare the entropy of the "all heads" macrostate with the "5 heads" macrostate, and state which the system overwhelmingly visits.

Recall Solution

All heads: — careful, "all heads" is : , so . Five heads: , so . The system spends almost all its time near "5 heads": that macrostate owns of the microstates (), while "all heads" owns just (). Higher ⇒ higher ⇒ where you find the system — the counting statement of the Second Law of Thermodynamics.

L4.3

Connect to information: Information Entropy (Shannon) uses and measures bits. For the free expansion (L2.2), how many bits of information were "created" ()? Contrast with the thermodynamic .

Recall Solution

Each molecule's left/right choice is exactly 1 bit of missing information, and there are 100 molecules. The thermodynamic entropy is the same count re-scaled by per bit: matching L2.2. Same idea — joules vs. bits is only a choice of the constant out front.


Level 5 — Mastery

(You choose the method; watch every case.)

L5.1

A system of distinguishable particles is distributed among energy cells. Consider the macrostate "one particle in each of 3 distinct cells." How many microstates (orderings) does it have, and what is its entropy? Then compare to "all three particles in the same single cell."

Recall Solution

One per cell: the particles are distinguishable and the cells are distinct, so this is the number of ways to assign 3 labelled particles to 3 labelled cells one-to-one . Entropy . All in one cell: there is exactly arrangement, so and . The spread-out macrostate has strictly higher entropy — more distinct orderings. (This is the microscopic logic behind the Boltzmann Distribution: energy populates many accessible cells because doing so maximises .)

L5.2

Limiting / degenerate case. As temperature , a perfect crystal settles into its unique ground state. Using , find and state which law this establishes. Then explain the caveat the parent note raised about isotopes.

Recall Solution

Ground state is unique ⇒ . This is the Third Law of Thermodynamics: entropy tends to zero as for a perfectly ordered pure crystal. Caveat: if the crystal contains randomly-placed isotopes, there are many ways to arrange which lattice site holds which isotope even at . Then and a residual entropy survives. "Order you can see" is not the same as "" — always count microstates, never eyeball tidiness.

L5.3

Full synthesis. Two gas boxes each hold molecules in volume . (a) Remove both boxes' internal partitions so each molecule accesses — total ? (b) Instead, connect the two boxes so all molecules share (assume identical, but track the position-doubling only). Show both give the same position-entropy and explain why via additivity.

Recall Solution

(a) Two independent free expansions, each of molecules doubling volume: (b) All molecules each double their position-states: , so Same answer. Why: entropy is additive (Step 2 of the parent's derivation). Whether you count the two 50-molecule contributions separately and add (), or count all 100 at once (), the turns the multiplied microstate counts into the same sum. Additivity guarantees the bookkeeping is consistent.


Connections