Exercises — Entropy and disorder — Boltzmann S = k·ln(W)
Reference tools you will reuse

Level 1 — Recognition
(Can you name the pieces and plug in?)
L1.1
State the value and SI units of the Boltzmann constant , and give the entropy of a macrostate that has exactly one microstate ().
Recall Solution
(joules per kelvin). For : . A unique state (only one way to build it) carries zero entropy — this is the seed of the Third Law of Thermodynamics.
L1.2
A macrostate has multiplicity . Compute its entropy in J/K.
Recall Solution
Here because . This is the "2 heads out of 4 coins" macrostate from the parent note.
L1.3
Which macrostate has higher entropy: one with microstates or one with ? By how much does differ?
Recall Solution
The one is higher (more ). The difference is Note: jumped by a factor of , but only rose by — a tiny additive bump, not a tenfold one.
Level 2 — Application
(Plug the counting into the formula end to end.)
L2.1
Toss distinguishable coins. Find the multiplicity of the macrostate "exactly 3 heads," then its entropy.
Recall Solution
We used because we are choosing which 3 of the 5 coins show heads — an unordered selection.
L2.2
molecules sit in a volume . A partition is removed so each molecule can now roam a volume . Find the entropy change (as a multiple of ), and its value in J/K.
Recall Solution
Each molecule independently gains twice as many position-states, so (position choices multiply across independent molecules — see Free Expansion of an Ideal Gas). Numerically .
L2.3
For the same setup, what is per molecule? Confirm it is independent of .
Recall Solution
It is constant because each molecule contributes the same factor of 2 to , and turns that product into a sum of equal terms . This is why entropy is extensive (scales with size ).
Level 3 — Analysis
(Multi-step reasoning; compare and interpret.)
L3.1
For coins, tabulate for . Which macrostate is most probable, and what fraction of the total microstates does it own?
Recall Solution
Total microstates . ✓ Most probable macrostate: (two heads), with . Fraction . The peaked middle wins because it has the most ways — the seed of the Second Law re-read as "drift to the biggest pile."

L3.2
Two independent systems have and . Find the combined , then verify explicitly that .
Recall Solution
Multiplicities multiply: . Separately: ✓ Numerically , so . The additivity is exactly the property — this is why the logarithm was chosen (see Microstates and Macrostates).
L3.3
Ice melts to water. Suppose each molecule gains a factor of in accessible arrangements. For one mole (), find .
Recall Solution
, so using . Positive, as it must be: liquid has far more accessible microstates than the locked-in crystal.
Level 4 — Synthesis
(Stitch several ideas together.)
L4.1
Show that the statistical result for free expansion of one mole to double volume equals the classical thermodynamic value, and give the number in J/(mol·K).
Recall Solution
Statistical: . This is exactly the value obtained from Clausius Entropy dS = dQ_rev / T by integrating along a reversible isothermal expansion from to (). Statistical and thermodynamic entropy agree — the whole point of .
L4.2
A biased situation: you have distinguishable coins. Compare the entropy of the "all heads" macrostate with the "5 heads" macrostate, and state which the system overwhelmingly visits.
Recall Solution
All heads: — careful, "all heads" is : , so . Five heads: , so . The system spends almost all its time near "5 heads": that macrostate owns of the microstates (), while "all heads" owns just (). Higher ⇒ higher ⇒ where you find the system — the counting statement of the Second Law of Thermodynamics.
L4.3
Connect to information: Information Entropy (Shannon) uses and measures bits. For the free expansion (L2.2), how many bits of information were "created" ()? Contrast with the thermodynamic .
Recall Solution
Each molecule's left/right choice is exactly 1 bit of missing information, and there are 100 molecules. The thermodynamic entropy is the same count re-scaled by per bit: matching L2.2. Same idea — joules vs. bits is only a choice of the constant out front.
Level 5 — Mastery
(You choose the method; watch every case.)
L5.1
A system of distinguishable particles is distributed among energy cells. Consider the macrostate "one particle in each of 3 distinct cells." How many microstates (orderings) does it have, and what is its entropy? Then compare to "all three particles in the same single cell."
Recall Solution
One per cell: the particles are distinguishable and the cells are distinct, so this is the number of ways to assign 3 labelled particles to 3 labelled cells one-to-one . Entropy . All in one cell: there is exactly arrangement, so and . The spread-out macrostate has strictly higher entropy — more distinct orderings. (This is the microscopic logic behind the Boltzmann Distribution: energy populates many accessible cells because doing so maximises .)
L5.2
Limiting / degenerate case. As temperature , a perfect crystal settles into its unique ground state. Using , find and state which law this establishes. Then explain the caveat the parent note raised about isotopes.
Recall Solution
Ground state is unique ⇒ ⇒ . This is the Third Law of Thermodynamics: entropy tends to zero as for a perfectly ordered pure crystal. Caveat: if the crystal contains randomly-placed isotopes, there are many ways to arrange which lattice site holds which isotope even at . Then and a residual entropy survives. "Order you can see" is not the same as "" — always count microstates, never eyeball tidiness.
L5.3
Full synthesis. Two gas boxes each hold molecules in volume . (a) Remove both boxes' internal partitions so each molecule accesses — total ? (b) Instead, connect the two boxes so all molecules share (assume identical, but track the position-doubling only). Show both give the same position-entropy and explain why via additivity.
Recall Solution
(a) Two independent free expansions, each of molecules doubling volume: (b) All molecules each double their position-states: , so Same answer. Why: entropy is additive (Step 2 of the parent's derivation). Whether you count the two 50-molecule contributions separately and add (), or count all 100 at once (), the turns the multiplied microstate counts into the same sum. Additivity guarantees the bookkeeping is consistent.
Connections
- Second Law of Thermodynamics — L3.1 and L4.2 are its counting proof.
- Free Expansion of an Ideal Gas — L2.2, L2.3, L4.1, L5.3.
- Clausius Entropy dS = dQ_rev / T — matched in L4.1.
- Microstates and Macrostates — the bookkeeping in every problem.
- Boltzmann Distribution — the energy-cell logic of L5.1.
- Information Entropy (Shannon) — bits vs. joules in L4.3.
- Third Law of Thermodynamics — L5.2's .
- Parent: Boltzmann entropy (Hinglish).