Before you can feel why that matters, you need to own every symbol the parent note throws at you. This page defines each one from absolute zero — plain words, then a picture, then the reason the topic can't live without it. Nothing here assumes you've met the notation before.
Why the topic needs it: the Zeroth Law is a statement about three or more separate objects. Without name tags we couldn't say "this one matches that one." The letters keep the players straight.
Why the topic needs it: the whole law is about the moment heat stops flowing. To talk about "no net flow" you must first have a picture of flow. See Thermal equilibrium and heat.
Why the topic needs it: the entire law is written in terms of ∼. It is the single verb of the sentence "A shakes hands with C, and B shakes hands with C, therefore A shakes hands with B."
A relation is just "a rule that either holds or doesn't between two things" (like ∼, or "is the same height as"). Three questions decide whether that rule is well-behaved.
Why the topic needs it: a relation that is Reflexive and Symmetric and Transitive is called an equivalence relation. The Zeroth Law is precisely the claim that ∼ is transitive — the only one of the three that isn't "obvious." See Equivalence relations (Mathematics).
Here is the payoff that makes every symbol worth defining.
Why the topic needs it:T is the output of the whole derivation. The parent note doesn't assume temperature exists — it earns it from transitivity. See Temperature and its measurement and Thermometers and temperature scales.
Why the topic needs it: it kills the classic trap "equal temperature = equal heat content." Equilibrium equalises the intensiveT, never the extensive energy. See Intensive vs extensive properties.
Why the topic needs it: the law is stated as (A∼C) and (B∼C)⟹(A∼B) — a one-way street. That one-wayness is exactly why the mistake "both not-equal-to C ⇒ not-equal to each other" is wrong: you can't drive backwards down a ⟹.