1.6.7 · D5 · HinglishOscillations & Waves
Question bank — Physical pendulum — compound pendulum
1.6.7 · D5· Physics › Oscillations & Waves › Physical pendulum — compound pendulum
Neeche use hone wale symbols ki reminders (sab parent note mein build hue hain):
- = rigid body ki total mass.
- = acceleration due to gravity (neeche ki taraf pull ki strength, Earth par).
- = moment of inertia pivot ke baare mein (dekho Moment of inertia).
- = pivot se center of mass (CM) ki doori.
- = CM ke baare mein Radius of gyration, toh .
- = equivalent Simple pendulum length.
- , sirf small ke liye valid aur sirf tab jab CM pivot ke neeche ho.
True or false — justify
The period of a compound pendulum depends on its mass
False — dono jagah appear karta hai, mein bhi aur mein bhi, toh yeh cancel ho jaata hai, bilkul Simple pendulum ki tarah; sirf mass ka distribution (through ) aur geometry bachti hai.
A real rod swings faster than a point mass placed at its center of mass
False — kyunki hai, bada matlab lamba period; aur kabhi bhi se zyada hota hai (kyunki ), toh real rod ki effective length zyada hoti hai aur yeh dheere swing karta hai.
Doubling every dimension of the pendulum (keeping shape) leaves the period unchanged
False — aur dono length ke saath scale karte hain, toh ; kyunki , scaled-up copy dheere swing karti hai.
If you know only the moment of inertia about the pivot, you can find the period
False — tumhe aur bhi chahiye; akela nahi bata sakta ki gravity ka lever arm kahan hai.
Two differently shaped bodies with the same have the same period
True — period sirf ke through body par depend karta hai, kyunki ; shape poori tarah us ek number mein collapse ho jaati hai.
Pivoting at the center of oscillation gives a different period than pivoting at the original point
False — yahi toh reversibility property hai: pivot aur center of oscillation interchangeable hain aur same dete hain, jise Kater's pendulum measure karne ke liye exploit karta hai.
The small-angle formula slightly under-estimates the true period of a large swing
True — exact period amplitude ke saath badhta hai, toh (amplitude-independent limit) ek floor hai jo real large swings actually exceed karte hain.
A compound pendulum on the Moon has the same period as on Earth
False — se hum dekhte hain ki , toh Moon ki weak gravity se lamba period milta hai; sirf shape-dependence -free hai, khud nahi.
Spot the error
"I'll plug straight into for a disk hung from its rim."
Wrong — body physically pivot ke baare mein rotate karti hai, toh tumhe chahiye (Parallel axis theorem); correct value hai, nahi.
"The effective length is just , the pivot-to-CM distance."
Effective length hai, jo strictly se badi hai; use karna assume karta hai ki sari mass CM par hai aur jo spread measure karta hai use ignore karta hai.
"As I slide the pivot toward the CM, the period keeps shrinking because there's less inertia to swing."
Yeh sirf tak shrink hota hai; minimum ke baad restoring torque se zyada tezi se khatam hota hai, toh turn around kar ke CM par infinity tak blow up ho jaata hai.
"The lever arm of gravity is , so the torque is ."
Perpendicular lever arm hai, jo restoring torque deta hai; sirf coefficient hai, aur (aur sign) drop karne se restoring behaviour poora delete ho jaata hai.
"Since is just an approximation, the formula is really exact if I'm careful."
Nahi — SHM form sirf isliye appear hoti hai kyunki ko linearise kiya gaya; large amplitude par equation genuinely nonlinear hai aur period sach mein depend karta hai ki tum kitna door swing karte ho.
"A door is not a pendulum because it swings about a vertical axis."
Sahi pakda — gravity vertical axis ke baare mein koi restoring torque provide nahi karti (CM ki height change nahi hoti), toh door gravity pendulum ki tarah bilkul oscillate nahi karta.
Why questions
Why must be taken about the pivot and not the CM?
Kyunki body physically fixed pivot axis ke baare mein rotate karti hai, aur rotational Newton's law moment of inertia actual axis of rotation ke baare mein use karta hai.
Why does the period go to infinity as the pivot approaches the CM?
Restoring torque hai, jo hone par ho jaata hai, jabki finite rehta hai; vanishing restoring "spring" ka matlab infinitely slow return hai.
Why is torque, not force, the right starting law here?
Motion fixed axis ke baare mein rotation hai, toh relevant balance twisting effect (torque) aur rotational sluggishness () ke beech hai, jo se capture hota hai, se nahi.
Why does a minimum period exist at all?
Do competing effects — CM ke paas restoring torque khatam hota hai (period badhta hai), aur CM se door ki tarah badhta hai (period badhta hai) — toh beech mein ek sweet spot ko minimize karta hai, jo par hota hai.
Why does mass cancel out of the period?
Har restoring term mein ka ek factor hota hai (gravity ) aur har inertial term mein ka ek factor hota hai (mass distribution ); ratio mein kahin nahi bachta, jo sabhi gravity pendulums ki ek hallmark hai.
Why is the equivalent length useful rather than just quoting ?
sari messy mass distribution ko ek single number mein collapse kar deta hai, jo tumhe kisi bhi rigid swinger ko Simple pendulum ki tarah treat karne aur bodies ko ek nazar mein compare karne deta hai.
Why does the parallel-axis theorem show up everywhere in this topic?
Tables dete hain, lekin physics ko chahiye; Parallel axis theorem dono ke beech ka bridge hai, aur yeh directly ki form produce karta hai.
Edge cases
What happens to the period if the pivot is placed exactly at the CM ()?
Gravity ka zero lever arm hai, toh koi restoring torque nahi hai; body ki koi preferred orientation nahi hoti aur yeh simply oscillate nahi karti — .
What happens if the pivot lies below the center of mass (an inverted, top-heavy setup)?
Equilibrium unstable ho jaata hai: thodi si tilt par gravity ab ke same sign wala torque produce karti hai (yaani ), jo body ko vertical se aur door push karta hai na ki wapas. Koi oscillation nahi hoti, formula real motion describe nahi karta (formally ), aur body topple ho jaati hai — bilkul inverted pendulum ki tarah.
What is the smallest possible period for a body of given radius of gyration ?
, tab achieve hota hai jab pivot CM se ki doori par ho, jisse milta hai.
If a body's entire mass really were concentrated at one point (so ), what does the compound formula reduce to?
, jisse milta hai — bilkul Simple pendulum, jo confirm karta hai ki compound result mein point-mass case included hai.
What limits the accuracy of as amplitude grows?
Approximation break down ho jaati hai; true period amplitude ke saath badhta hai, toh formula sirf small-oscillation limit hai.
If a body has two possible pivot distances giving the same period, how are they related?
Yeh conjugate points aur hain jo CM ke opposite sides par hain aur ke saath; yeh pairing (pivot ↔ center of oscillation) Kater's pendulum ko underlie karta hai.
Does the compound-pendulum analysis apply to a Torsional pendulum?
Nahi — torsional pendulum ka restoring torque twisted wire se aata hai (), gravity ke lever arm se nahi, toh uska period mein koi aur koi nahi hai.
Recall Har trap ki one-line summary
Lagbhag har mistake teen mein se ek hai: (1) ki jagah use karna, (2) ko samajh lena, ya (3) yeh bhool jaana ki assume kiya gaya tha (aur ki CM pivot ke neeche hona chahiye). Inhe seedha rakho aur topic disarm ho jaata hai.