1.5.14 · D5 · HinglishRotational Mechanics
Question bank — Rolling KE = ½mv² + ½Iω²
1.5.14 · D5· Physics › Rotational Mechanics › Rolling KE = ½mv² + ½Iω²
True ya false — justify karo
Ek ring aur ek solid sphere jo same mass aur radius ke hain aur same par roll kar rahe hain, unki total KE same hoti hai
False. Same hai lekin alag hai: ring ke liye hai, sphere ke liye hai, to equal speed par ring zyada KE carry karta hai.
Kisi object ka mass double karne se fixed par uski rolling KE double ho jaati hai
True. , mein linear hai, aur sirf shape par depend karta hai, mass par nahi — isliye mass seedha KE ko scale karta hai.
Same shape ke do spheres lekin alag radii ke, ramp ke bottom par same speed par pahunche hain
True. aur , kisi bhi solid sphere ke liye hota hai; radius puri tarah cancel ho jaata hai, to dono same par pohonchte hain.
KE ka rotational fraction se zyada ho sakta hai
True — lekin sirf ke liye, yaani mass se pare concentrated ho (rare). Plain ring ke liye exactly deta hai; standard solid shapes isse neeche rehti hain.
König's theorem sirf tab hold karta hai jab body rolling without slipping ho
False. König's split kisi bhi rigid body ke liye valid hai jo plane motion mein ho. Rolling-without-slipping sirf link karne ke liye chahiye taaki KE ek variable mein collapse ho sake.
Agar ek wheel jagah par spin kare (car mud mein phans gayi, ) to uski KE zero hai
False. Translational KE zero hai lekin bahut bada hai — saari energy spin mein lock hai kyunki no-slip link toot chuki hai.
Frictionless ramp par ek ball phir bhi roll karti hai aur neeche jaate waqt spin gain karti hai
False. Zero friction hone par center ke baare mein koi torque nahi hota, to kabhi nahi badalta; ball slide karti hai neeche aur par pohonchti hai, roll karne se zyada fast.
Rolling without slipping mein static friction koi kaam nahi karta
True. Contact point instantaneously rest par hota hai, isliye friction force har instant mein zero displacement ke through kaam karta hai — yeh torque deta hai lekin energy transfer nahi karta.
Error dhundho
"Ek rolling disc bas ek moving object hai, isliye iski KE hai."
Galat: yeh spinning bhi hai. add karna zaroori hai; isko ignore karne se KE kam count hoti hai aur galat predict hota hai ki sab shapes ramp bottom par equal speed par pohonchenge.
"Rolling ki KE hai."
Double-counting. Ya to use karo ya akela — dono kabhi nahi. Parallel-axis theorem se mein pehle se wala piece hai.
"Bhaari ball downhill race jeetegi."
Mass irrelevant hai. PE () aur KE () dono ke saath scale karte hain, isliye cancel ho jaata hai; order sirf decide karta hai.
"Kyunki translation aur rotation independent motions hain, main koi bhi aur koi bhi choose kar sakta hoon."
Yeh sirf slipping mein sach hai. Rolling without slipping mein constraint unhe lock kar deta hai — woh independently choose karne ke liye free nahi hain.
"Ek solid sphere aur hollow sphere jinka mass aur radius equal hain, bottom par saath pohonchte hain."
Nahi. , to solid sphere () hollow sphere () ko beat karta hai.
"König's derivation mein cross term isliye vanish hota hai kyunki small hai."
Nahi — yeh exactly aur hamesha vanish hota hai, kyunki : center of mass ki apne relative velocity zero hoti hai, chahe kitni bhi fast ho.
"KE nikalne ke liye main use karta hoon jahan radius of gyration hai."
Galat . Rolling constraint geometric radius use karta hai (jo ground ko touch karta hai). Radius of gyration (jahan ) ek alag length hai jo ke andar use hoti hai, mein nahi.
Why questions
Ring ek solid sphere se downhill race kyun harti hai jab dono ka mass aur radius same ho?
Ring ka bada released PE ka ek bada fraction ( vs ) spinning mein divert kar deta hai, forward motion ke liye kam bachta hai, isliye uska chhota hota hai.
Hum translational aur rotational KE ko add kyun kar sakte hain, kuch zyada complicated kiye bina?
Kyunki König's cross term khatam ho jaata hai (), do energies cleanly decouple ho jaati hain — sliding aur spinning pictures ke beech kuch share ya double-count nahi hota.
Race order ramp angle aur height se independent kyun hai?
Har ramp ke liye hai; ya angle badalne se saari speeds same factor se rescale hoti hain, isliye ke hisaab se ordering kabhi nahi badlti.
Rolling without slipping mein kinetic friction nahi, static friction kyun kaam karta hai?
Contact point ki relative sliding velocity zero hoti hai, jo exactly static friction ki condition hai; kinetic friction sirf tab aata hai jab surfaces ek doosre ke against slide karein.
Rolling ko contact point ke baare mein pure rotation ki tarah dekhna same KE kyun deta hai?
Parallel-axis: , isliye — algebraically identical hai.
Ice par no-slip constraint kyun hold nahi karta?
Bahut kam friction se wheel slip karta hai, isliye contact point surface ke relative move karta hai; aur tumhe aur ko alag-alag track karna padta hai.
Edge cases
Ek body frictionless slope par bina kisi rotation ke slide kar rahi hai () — bottom par uski KE kya hai?
Pure translation: jahan hai. Yeh limit / no-spin case hai, sabse fast possible descent.
Ek hoop jiska saara mass rim par hai () — uski rolling KE ka kitna fraction rotational hai?
Exactly half: . Sliding aur spinning mein equal energy — common shapes mein extreme case.
par (imaginary mass axis se bahut door feka gaya) bottom par ka kya hoga?
: almost saari PE spin mein jaati hai, isliye translational descent crawl ki taraf slow ho jaata hai.
Jis instant ek wheel rest se start karta hai aur ho, kya koi KE present hai?
Agar yeh bhi spin nahi kar raha (), to nahi. Lekin agar rest se rolling release ho to dono par zero hain; KE tabhi aati hai jab speed aata hai aur, constraint se, spin bhi saath aata hai.
Ek perfectly point-like particle () ramp par "rolling" kar raha hai — formula kya deta hai?
, isliye aur — yeh frictionless slider ki tarah behave karta hai, kyunki spin energy store karne ke liye koi moment of inertia nahi hai.
Recall Traps ki one-line summary
Dono KEs add karo (pictures mix mat karo), akela race decide karta hai, mass aur radius cancel ho jaate hain, aur link sirf rolling without slipping mein exist karta hai.