1.3.8 · Physics › Work, Energy & Power
Ek ball ko girte hue imagine karo. Jaise-jaise wo neeche aati hai, speed badhti hai (kinetic energy gain hoti hai) lekin height ghatti hai (potential energy lose hoti hai). Isme magic yeh hai ki jo KE gain hoti hai wo exactly utni hi hoti hai jitni PE lose hoti hai. Kuch create ya destroy nahi hota — energy sirf costume badlti hai . Total frozen rehta hai. Wahi frozen total hum mechanical energy kehte hain, aur yeh prove karna ki wo constant rehti hai — isi note ka purpose hai.
Definition Mechanical energy
Kisi system ki mechanical energy E uski kinetic aur potential energies ka sum hoti hai:
E = K + U
jahan K = 2 1 m v 2 aur U potential energy hai (jaise gravitational U = m g h ).
Definition Conservative force
Ek force conservative hoti hai agar wo do points ke beech kisi object par jo work karti hai wo path se independent ho (equivalently, kisi bhi closed loop par work zero hoti hai). Gravity aur spring forces conservative hain; friction nahi hai.
Claim yeh hai: Agar sirf conservative forces hi work karti hain, tab E = K + U time mein constant rehti hai.
Do facts saara kaam karte hain:
Work–energy theorem (Newton ke 2nd law se): net work = kinetic energy mein change.
Potential energy ki definition : conservative force dwara kiya gaya work minus uski potential energy ka change hota hai.
Inhe side by side rakho aur result khud nikal aata hai. Chalte hain, har piece ko scratch se derive karte hain.
Newton ke second law se ek dimension mein shuru karo, F n e t = ma = m d t d v .
Object jab d x displacement karta hai to net work:
d W n e t = F n e t d x = m d t d v d x
Worked example Yeh step kyun?
Hum yahan variables swap karne ke liye chain rule ka ek trick use karte hain. Kyunki d x = v d t :
d t d v d x = d t d v ( v d t ) = v d v
Isse time khatam ho jaata hai aur sirf velocity bachti hai — exactly wahi jo chahiye, kyunki KE v par depend karti hai, t par nahi.
Toh:
d W n e t = m v d v
State 1 (v 1 ) se State 2 (v 2 ) tak integrate karo:
W n e t = ∫ v 1 v 2 m v d v = 2 1 m v 2 2 − 2 1 m v 1 2 = Δ K
Ek conservative force ke liye, hum potential energy is tarah define karte hain ki uska kiya hua work potential energy ki drop ke barabar ho:
W co n s = − Δ U = − ( U 2 − U 1 )
Intuition Minus sign kyun?
Ball ko gravity ke against upar uthao: gravity negative work karti hai, phir bhi PE badhti hai. "Gravity dwara work" aur "PE mein change" ko opposite signs ke saath align karne ke liye, hum minus ko definition mein hi daal dete hain. Check karo: ball girti hai ⇒ gravity positive work karti hai ⇒ U ghatti hai. ✓
Earth ke paas gravity ke liye, F = − m g (neeche). Height h 1 se h 2 tak move karne par uska work:
W g r a v = ∫ h 1 h 2 ( − m g ) d h = − m g ( h 2 − h 1 ) = − ( m g h 2 − m g h 1 )
W co n s = − Δ U se compare karne par jaana-maana U = m g h milta hai. Humne ise derive kiya, assume nahi kiya.
Agar work karne wali sirf conservative force hai, tab W n e t = W co n s . Step 1 ko Step 2 ke barabar rakho:
Δ K = W n e t = W co n s = − Δ U
Δ K + Δ U = 0 ⟹ Δ ( K + U ) = 0
Recall Answer padhne se pehle forecast karo
Ek ball height h se rest se drop ki jaati hai. Energy conservation use karke zameen par uski speed predict karo, phir kinematics se verify karo.
Energy: K 1 + U 1 = K 2 + U 2 ⇒ 0 + m g h = 2 1 m v 2 + 0 ⇒ v = 2 g h .
Kinematics: v 2 = u 2 + 2 g h = 0 + 2 g h ⇒ v = 2 g h . ✓ Same answer — energy method ne time ko bilkul skip kar diya.
Worked example Example 1 — Pendulum bob
Mass m ka ek bob rest se release hota hai jahan string support level ke saath horizontal hai (lowest point se h = L upar). Bottom par speed nikalo.
Setup: Tension hamesha motion ke perpendicular hoti hai ⇒ zero work karti hai ⇒ sirf gravity (conservative) kaam karti hai ⇒ energy conserved.
Yeh step kyun? Agar koi non-working force hoti, toh hume work–energy theorem extra terms ke saath use karna padta; check karna ki tension koi work nahi karti, wahi conservation law ko use karne ki permission deta hai.
m g L = 2 1 m v 2 ⇒ v = 2 g L
Worked example Example 2 — Block on a spring
Ek block (m ) ko ek spring (constant k ) ke against push kiya jaata hai, use x compress karke, phir frictionless floor par release kiya jaata hai. Launch speed nikalo.
Spring PE hai U s p r in g = 2 1 k x 2 (derive karo: W s p r in g = ∫ 0 x ( − k x ′ ) d x ′ = − 2 1 k x 2 = − Δ U ).
Yeh step kyun? Plug in karne se pehle is conservative force ke liye sahi U banana zaroori hai.
2 1 k x 2 = 2 1 m v 2 ⇒ v = x m k
Worked example Example 3 — Heights aur springs ka mix
Ek ball (m ) frictionless ramp se height h se neeche roll karti hai aur bottom par ek spring ko max x compress karti hai. k nikalo.
Yeh step kyun? Maximum compression par ball momentarily rest mein hoti hai (K = 0 ), toh saari gravitational PE, spring PE ban jaati hai.
m g h = 2 1 k x 2 ⇒ k = x 2 2 m g h
Common mistake "Energy hamesha conserved hoti hai, toh main hamesha
K 1 + U 1 = K 2 + U 2 likh sakta hoon."
Kyun sahi lagta hai: universe ki total energy sach mein conserved hoti hai, toh phrase bulletproof lagta hai.
Fix: Mechanical energy tab conserved hoti hai jab non-conservative forces koi work na karein . Friction KE ko heat mein badal deta hai; woh heat energy toh hai, lekin ab K + U mein nahi hai. Friction ke saath: K 2 + U 2 = K 1 + U 1 + W f r i c t i o n (aur W f r i c t i o n < 0 ).
Common mistake "Main gravity ka work
aur gravitational PE dono include karunga."
Kyun sahi lagta hai: gravity work karti hai, toh zaroor iska work term add karein.
Fix: Yeh double-counting hai. Potential energy conservative force ke work ka bookkeeping hai hi . Ya toh gravity ko ek force ki tarah track karo (work–energy theorem) ya U = m g h ki tarah (energy conservation) — dono kabhi nahi.
Common mistake "Tension / normal force zaroor work karegi kyunki ye badi forces hain."
Kyun sahi lagta hai: bada magnitude energetic lagta hai.
Fix: Work = F ⋅ d . Forces jo motion ke perpendicular hain (swinging string par tension, slope par normal force) size ki parwah kiye bina zero work karti hain.
Recall Feynman: 12-saal ke bacche ko explain karo
Energy ko pocket money ki tarah socho jo tum do pockets mein rakh sakte ho: ek "moving" pocket (kinetic) aur ek "stored-up" pocket (potential — jaise upar hona ya dabaa hua spring). Jab ball girती hai, paisa "high-up" pocket se "moving" pocket mein slide hota hai — lekin tumhari dono pockets mein total paisa kabhi nahi badlta . Paisa kho sirf tab sakta hai jab ek chipku chor jiska naam friction hai kuch pakad le aur use heat mein badal de. Friction nahi, chor nahi → tumhara total hamesha exactly same rehta hai.
"K Up, U Down — Total's Frozen."
Aur yeh kab kaam karta hai: "No friction, no problem" (sirf conservative forces ⇒ energy conserved).
Mechanical energy kya hoti hai? Kinetic aur potential energy ka sum, E = K + U .
Work–energy theorem state karo. Kisi object par kiya gaya net work uski kinetic energy ke change ke barabar hota hai, W n e t = Δ K .
Conservative force se potential energy kaise define hoti hai? Us force dwara kiye gaye work ke negative ke roop mein: W co n s = − Δ U .
Mechanical energy kab conserved hoti hai? Jab sirf conservative forces hi work karti hain (friction jaise non-conservative forces se koi net work nahi).
Energy use karke height h se girae gaye object ki v derive karo. W co n s = − Δ U mein minus sign kyun aata hai?Taaki force dwara kiye gaye work aur stored PE ke change ke opposite signs hon (force +work kare ⇒ PE gire).
Yahan energy conservation kinematics se aasaan kyun hai? Yeh time aur force direction ko eliminate kar deta hai; sirf do states compare karte hain.
Friction hone par Δ E = 0 ki jagah kya aata hai? Δ ( K + U ) = W n c , non-conservative forces dwara kiya gaya work (friction ke liye negative).
String tension pendulum bob par koi work kyun nahi karti? Yeh hamesha bob ki velocity ke perpendicular hoti hai, toh
F ⋅ d = 0 .
Spring potential energy formula aur uska derivation source? U = 2 1 k x 2 , − ∫ 0 x ( − k x ′ ) d x ′ se.
Mechanical energy conserved
Friction non-conservative