1.3.3 · Physics › Work, Energy & Power
Jab tum kisi cheez ko push karte ho, tumhari push work karti hai, aur woh work gayab nahi hoti — woh dikhti hai is roop mein ki object kitna fast move kar raha hai, yaani uski kinetic energy . Work–Energy Theorem bas Newton ka F = ma hi hai jo time ki jagah distance par integrate kiya gaya hai.
Definition Work–Energy Theorem
Ek particle par saari forces ka net work uski kinetic energy mein change ke barabar hota hai:
W n e t = Δ K = K f − K i = 2 1 m v f 2 − 2 1 m v i 2
jahan kinetic energy hai K = 2 1 m v 2 .
WHAT yeh relate karta hai: force-over-distance (W ) ↔ speed change (Δ K ).
WHY yeh useful hai: yeh time aur acceleration ko skip kar deta hai. Agar tumhe force vs. position pata hai, tum directly final speed paa sakte ho — a ( t ) solve karne ki zaroorat nahi.
Newton ka law batata hai ki force velocity ko time mein kaise change karta hai: F = m d t d v .
Lekin hum jaanna chahte hain ki force velocity ko distance par kaise change karta hai. Toh poora game yeh hai: time derivative ko position derivative mein convert karo. Bas yahi ek trick poora theorem produce karti hai.
v d v kyun magic hai
d t d v ⋅ d x = d t d x ⋅ d v = v d v . Humne "swap" kiya ki kaun sa quantity differentiate ho raha hai. Physically: yeh poochhhne ki jagah ki "speed har second kaise change hoti hai?" hum poochh rahe hain "speed har metre kaise change hoti hai?" — aur metres exactly wahi hai jo work care karta hai.
3-D motion ke liye jahan F = m d t d v :
F ⋅ d r = m d t d v ⋅ v d t = m v ⋅ d v = d ( 2 1 m v ⋅ v ) = d ( 2 1 m v 2 )
Integrate karo: ∫ F ⋅ d r = Δ K . Same theorem, dot product direction ko automatically handle kar leta hai.
Worked example 1 — Block ko floor par push karna
Ek 2 kg ka block rest se shuru hota hai. Ek constant net force 10 N , 5 m tak act karta hai. Final speed nikalo.
W n e t = F d = 10 × 5 = 50 J . Kyun? Constant force ⇒ ∫ F d x = F d .
Δ K = 50 J , aur K i = 0 toh K f = 50 J . Kyun? Theorem: net work = K mein change.
2 1 ( 2 ) v f 2 = 50 ⇒ v f 2 = 50 ⇒ v f = 50 ≈ 7.07 m/s . Kyun? K = 2 1 m v 2 ko v ke liye solve karo.
Worked example 2 — Variable (spring-like) force
Ek force F ( x ) = 6 x N , ek 3 kg mass par (initially at rest) x = 0 se x = 2 m tak act karta hai.
W = ∫ 0 2 6 x d x = [ 3 x 2 ] 0 2 = 12 J . Kyun? Force vary karta hai, isliye hume zaroor integrate karna hoga, sirf multiply nahi.
2 1 ( 3 ) v f 2 = 12 ⇒ v f 2 = 8 ⇒ v f = 2 2 ≈ 2.83 m/s . Kyun? Yahi theorem ka payoff hai — humhe kabhi a ( t ) ki zaroorat nahi padi.
Common mistake "Work = Force × distance, hamesha."
Kyun sahi lagta hai: formula W = F d pehle padhaya jaata hai aur simplest case mein kaam karta hai.
Fix: yeh tabhi sahi hai jab F constant aur motion ke parallel ho. Generally W = ∫ F ⋅ d r . Integral use karo jab force vary kare (springs, gravity over large distances) ya angled ho.
Common mistake "Theorem mein
applied force use karo."
Kyun sahi lagta hai: tum apni apply ki gayi force control karte ho, isliye woh central lagti hai.
Fix: theorem net work use karta hai (saari forces — friction, gravity, normal). Constant velocity par drag kiya gaya block W n e t = 0 rakhta hai chahe tum positive work karo, kyunki friction equal negative work karta hai.
Common mistake "Negative work impossible hai / matlab koi work nahi."
Kyun sahi lagta hai: "work" effort jaisa lagta hai, jo positive feel hota hai.
Fix: sign F ⋅ d r se aata hai. Displacement ke opposite force ⇒ negative work ⇒ kinetic energy decreases . Yahi exactly braking hai.
Common mistake "Kinetic energy velocity ki direction par depend karti hai."
Kyun sahi lagta hai: velocity ek vector hai.
Fix: K = 2 1 m v 2 mein speed squared use hoti hai; yeh ek scalar hai, hamesha ≥ 0 . 5 m/s par left ya right move karne wali ball ki K identical hogi.
Recall Feynman: ek 12-saal ke bachche ko explain karo
Socho tum ek toy car push kar rahe ho. Jitna zyada aur jitni der push karo (woh hai "work"), utna fast woh end mein jaayega (woh hai "motion ki energy"). Agar tum usse pakad ke ulta push karo, tum use slow kar dete ho — tum "negative work" kar rahe ho aur uski speed chura rahe ho. Theorem bas yahi kehta hai: tumne poori distance mein jo bhi pushing ki, woh sab add karke exactly barabar hai car ki go-fast energy mein kitna change aaya. Kuch bhi nahi kho jaata; yeh bas motion ke liye bookkeeping hai.
"Net work nets you new speed." Aur derivation ke liye: "d x se multiply karo, chain-rule se v d v tak jao, integrate karo."
Work–Energy Theorem ko words mein state karo. Ek particle par kiya gaya net work uski kinetic energy mein change ke barabar hota hai: W n e t = Δ K .
Kaun sa single calculus trick F = ma ko work–energy theorem mein convert karta hai? d t d v d x = d t d x d v = v d v likhna, time ko eliminate karna.
Kinetic energy kya hai aur yeh scalar kyun hai? K = 2 1 m v 2 ; yeh speed squared par depend karta hai, velocity ki direction par nahi.
W n e t = Δ K mein kaun si forces count hoti hain?SAARI forces — net force (applied, friction, gravity, normal, etc.).
W = F d kab valid hai W = ∫ F ⋅ d r ki jagah?Sirf jab force constant aur displacement ke parallel ho.
Ek block constant velocity par drag kiya jaata hai. W n e t kya hai? Zero, kyunki Δ K = 0 (tumhara work friction ke negative work se cancel ho jaata hai).
Work negative kyun ho sakta hai? Jab force ka displacement ke opposite component ho,
F ⋅ d r < 0 , kinetic energy remove hoti hai.
Force F ( x ) = 6 x ek mass par 0 se 2 m tak act karta hai. Net work? ∫ 0 2 6 x d x = 12 J .
Theorem yahan F = ma se zyada convenient kyun hai? Yeh force-over-distance ko directly speed se link karta hai, acceleration aur time ko skip karke.
generalizes via dot product
Time derivative of velocity
Change in kinetic energy ΔK
Force vs position gives final speed