1.3.2 · Physics › Work, Energy & Power
Intuition The big picture
Jab force constant hoti hai, toh work sirf W = F d hota hai — "push × distance" ka ek rectangle.
Lekin real forces change hoti hain jaise tum move karte ho: ek spring jitna zyada stretch karo utna harder pull karti hai, gravity altitude ke saath weak hoti hai, friction surface ke saath vary karti hai.
Trick yeh hai: path ko itne chote pieces mein chop karo ki har piece pe force practically constant ho. Har piece pe work ek chota rectangle F d x hota hai. Phir saare slivers add karo — yahi adding-up exactly woh hai jo ek integral karta hai.
Definition Work (general definition)
Ek force F ka kisi infinitesimal displacement d r pe kiya hua work hota hai
d W = F ⋅ d r
Point A se point B tak ka total work in saari choti contributions ka sum hota hai:
W = ∫ A B F ⋅ d r
WHAT hai problem? W = F d assume karta hai ki F d ke poore raaste ek hi number hai. Agar F position pe depend karta hai, F ( x ) , toh woh formula ek jhooth hai — sivaaye ek vanishingly small step pe.
WHY integration isko fix karta hai? Kyunki F ( x ) ek infinitely small interval d x pe approximately constant hota hai. Toh us step pe work sach mein ek rectangle F ( x ) d x hota hai. Integral ∫ F ( x ) d x define hota hai un rectangles ko summing karne ki limit ke roop mein — yeh literally "F vs x graph ke neeche ka area" hai.
HOW hum ise scratch se derive karte hain? (1-D case, force along motion.)
Worked example 1 — Stretching a spring (Hooke's law)
Ek spring F applied = k x obey karta hai (spring ko balance karne ke liye tumhe itna hi pull karna padta hai). 0 se x 0 tak stretch karne mein work nikalo.
W = ∫ 0 x 0 k x d x
Yeh step kyun? Force stretch ke saath linearly grow karta hai, toh hum F d use nahi kar sakte; hum integrate karte hain.
W = k [ 2 x 2 ] 0 x 0 = 2 1 k x 0 2
Yeh answer sense kyun deta hai: stretch pe average force hai 2 0 + k x 0 = 2 1 k x 0 , aur work = average force × distance = 2 1 k x 0 ⋅ x 0 = 2 1 k x 0 2 . ✓ Geometrically yeh line F = k x ke neeche ka triangle hai.
Worked example 2 — A position-dependent force
F ( x ) = ( 3 x 2 + 2 x ) N ek body pe act karta hai jo x = 1 m se x = 3 m tak move karta hai. W nikalo.
W = ∫ 1 3 ( 3 x 2 + 2 x ) d x
Yeh step kyun? F x pe depend karta hai, toh chop-and-sum → integral.
= [ x 3 + x 2 ] 1 3 = ( 27 + 9 ) − ( 1 + 1 ) = 36 − 2 = 34 J
Yeh limits kyun? Lower limit = start position, upper = end. Order matter karta hai: inhe swap karna sign flip kar deta hai (force negative work karta hai agar tum reverse karo).
Worked example 3 — Force given as a graph
Ek force dikhaye anusaar vary karta hai: yeh linearly 0 se 20 N tak rise karta hai 0 → 4 m mein, phir 4 → 6 m mein 20 N pe rehta hai.
Graph kyun formula ki jagah? Work = area under the curve , toh bas geometric area compute karo.
Triangle: 2 1 ( 4 ) ( 20 ) = 40 J
Rectangle: ( 6 − 4 ) ( 20 ) = 40 J
Total W = 80 J.
Yeh kyun kaam karta hai: area hi limit mein Riemann sum hai — same cheez hai jaise integrate karna.
Worked example 4 — When force opposes motion (negative work)
Ek retarding force F = − b v ... lekin yahan position use karo: F ( x ) = − 5 x N , body 0 → 2 m move karti hai.
W = ∫ 0 2 ( − 5 x ) d x = − 5 [ 2 x 2 ] 0 2 = − 5 ( 2 ) = − 10 J
Negative kyun? Force poore time displacement ke opposite point karta hai, toh har F d x slice negative hai — energy body se bahar jaati hai.
W = F d for a variable force
Yeh sahi kyun lagta hai: W = F d pehla formula hai jo tum seekhte ho aur yeh clean hai.
Yeh galat kyun hai: F path ke along ek single number nahi hai; initial ya final force se multiply karna saari beech ki values ko ignore karta hai.
Fix: Jaise hi F x (ya v , t ) pe depend kare, W = ∫ F d x likho. F d sirf tab use karo jab F genuinely constant ho — jo phir vaise bhi integral ke barabar hota hai.
Common mistake Forgetting the
cos θ in the dot product
Yeh sahi kyun lagta hai: 1-D problems mein force aur motion aligned hote hain, toh log angle drop kar dete hain.
Yeh galat kyun hai: d W = F ⋅ d r = F d r cos θ . Agar force ek angle pe hai, toh sirf motion ke along component kaam karta hai.
Fix: cos θ rakho; perpendicular forces (jaise centripetal, normal force) zero work karte hain.
Common mistake Mixing up "work by spring" vs "work to stretch spring"
Yeh sahi kyun lagta hai: dono mein 2 1 k x 2 involve hai.
Yeh galat kyun hai: spring force − k x hai, toh spring dwara kiya work − 2 1 k x 2 hai; tumhara uske against kiya work + 2 1 k x 2 hai. Opposite signs!
Fix: clearly batao ki tum kaunsa force integrate kar rahe ho.
Recall Feynman: explain it to a 12-year-old
Socho tum ek shopping cart push kar rahe ho, lekin floor jitna aage jaao utna stickier hoti jaati hai. Start mein easy hai, baad mein bahut hard push karna padta hai. Total effort nikalne ke liye tum ek push ko distance se multiply nahi kar sakte — push badhti rehti hai! Toh tum pretend karte ho ki tum ek tiny step at a time chalt ho, note karte ho ki us step pe kitna push kiya, tiny step se multiply karte ho, aur likh lete ho. Yeh har tiny step ke liye karo aur saari choti numbers add karo. "Push × tiny step" ka yeh bada addition exactly wahi hai jise mathematicians integral kehte hain, aur yeh total work deta hai. Yeh us picture ka area bhi hai jo tum draw karte agar "push" upar jaata aur "distance" across jaata.
"Slice it, push it, sum it."
Slice the path → push (force) over each slice → sum the slivers = ∫ F d x .
Aur: "Variable force? Reach for the integral sign."
What is the general definition of work for a variable force? W = ∫ A B F ⋅ d r , path pe
F ⋅ d r ka sum.
Why can't we use W = F d for a variable force? Kyunki F path ke along change hota hai; F d ek single constant force value assume karta hai.
How does the integral ∫ F d x relate to a graph? Yeh Force vs position curve ke neeche ka area hai.
Derive the work to stretch a spring from 0 to x 0 . W = ∫ 0 x 0 k x d x = 2 1 k x 0 2 .
What does the area under an F –x graph represent? Force dwara kiya gaya work.
For F ( x ) = 3 x 2 + 2 x from x = 1 to x = 3 , what is W ? [ x 3 + x 2 ] 1 3 = 36 − 2 = 34 J.
When is work done by a force negative? Jab force ka ek component displacement ke opposite ho (cos θ < 0 ).
Why does a perpendicular force (e.g. normal/centripetal) do zero work? What is the Riemann-sum origin of W = ∫ F d x ? W = lim Δ x → 0 ∑ F ( x i ) Δ x i .
Force varies with position F of x
Sliver work F of x times dx
Integral W = integral F dx