Is page par yeh assume kiya gaya hai ki aapne parent note ki notation pehle kabhi nahi dekhi. Hum har symbol ko ground up se build karte hain, ek aisi order mein jahan har ek sirf pichle waalon par depend karta hai.
Ek fair experiment imagine karo — ek spinning wheel, ek rolled die, ek measured height. Jab bhi aap ise run karte ho, ek cheez hoti hai. Woh "ek cheez jo hoti hai" ko outcome kehte hain.
Topic ko yeh kyun chahiye: independence probabilities ke baare mein ek statement hai, isliye hume object P ki zaroorat hai jo woh numbers deta hai — baaki sab se pehle.
Symbol ∩ ka matlab hai "aur" — do events ka overlap.
(Figure s01) — Do event-circles A (lavender) aur B (coral). Yeh picture symbol ∩ ko concrete banati hai: shaded lens jahan circles overlap karti hain wahiA∩B hai, woh region jo P measure karta hai jab hum poochte hain "dono hote hain".
Topic ko yeh kyun chahiye: events ke liye yeh multiply-rule seed hai. Independent variables ka poora idea yahi hai: is rule ko har us sawaal ke liye sach banao jo aap pooch sakte ho. Dekho Independence of events.
(Figure s02) — Teen-box flow outcome → X → number literally dikhata hai ki symbol X kya karta hai: ek die-outcome butter-coloured machine X mein enter hota hai aur ek bare number bahar nikalta hai. Isliye {X∈A} niche ek event hai — yeh un saare outcomes ko name karta hai jinke exiting number A mein land hote hain.
Notation {X∈A} (jahan A ab numbers ka ek set hai, jaise interval (−∞,x]) khud ek event hai: "woh number jo X produce karta hai woh A ke andar land karta hai."
Topic ko yeh kyun chahiye: variables ki independence is demand se define hoti hai ki {X∈A} aur {Y∈B}saare number-sets A,B ke liye independent events hon.
Ek random variable ki poori personality uski distribution hai: uske output-numbers kaise spread out hote hain. Iske teen languages hain.
(Figure s03) — Ek hi variable teen languages mein side by side: lavender CDF0→1 tak chadhti hai, coral PMF discrete spikes ke roop mein, aur mint PDF jahan area ka ek shaded slice ek probability hai. Teeno ko ek picture se padhna hi aapko allow karta hai ki parent ke CDF-, PMF- aur PDF-factorisation rules ko ek hi idea ke roop mein pehchano.
Topic ko yeh kyun chahiye: parent ke teen criteria (CDF, PMF, PDF factorisation) in teen languages mein likha hua wahi ek statement hai. Teeno ko pehchaanna zaroori hai.
Ab show ka star. Jab ek hi experiment par do machines X aur Y chal rahe hain, toh ek outcome ek pair(X,Y) produce karta hai — plane mein ek point.
(Figure s04) — Lavender cloud joint pair (X,Y) hai. Har point ko seedha x-axis par neeche dabaana (coral) Y ko bhool jaata hai aur X ka marginal chhodta hai; baayein y-axis par dabaana (mint) Y ka marginal chhodta hai. Yeh do shadows exactly wahi hain jo neeche wale marginal integrals/sums compute karte hain.
(Figure s05) — Baayein, ek mint rectangle support: har horizontal slice same range of x offer karta hai, isliye y fix karna x ke baare mein kuch naya nahi batata. Daayein, ek coral triangle support: ek bada x choose karna chhota yforbid karta hai. Yeh picture isliye hai kyunki "support ek box hona chahiye" ek genuine extra condition hai, decoration nahi.
Topic ko yeh kyun chahiye: parent ke "consequences" section mein dikhaya gaya hai ki independence Cov=0 force karti hai, aur warn karta hai ki reverse fail hota hai. Ise padhne se pehle aapko yeh chahiye. Dekho Covariance and correlation.