Worked examples — Joint distributions — joint PMF - PDF, marginal, conditional
The scenario matrix
Every joint-distribution problem is one of these cases. The right column names the worked example that covers it.
| Cell | Case class | What makes it tricky | Covered by |
|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | Discrete, finite table | just sums, but must find marginals & test independence | Example 1 |
| C2 | Discrete, truly independent | joint factors exactly — the "null" case | Example 2 |
| C3 | Continuous on a rectangle | constant bounds, easiest continuous case | Example 3 |
| C4 | Continuous on a triangle (support matters) | bounds depend on the other variable | Example 4 |
| C5 | Degenerate / zero input | conditioning on — undefined | Example 5 |
| C6 | Limiting behaviour | what happens as we slide the conditioning value to an edge | Example 6 |
| C7 | Real-world word problem | translate English → joint PMF, then answer a question | Example 7 |
| C8 | Exam twist: given conditional + marginal, rebuild the joint (chain rule) | reverse direction, uses Bayes' Theorem flavour | Example 8 |
We hit all eight cells below.
Example 1 — Discrete table (Cell C1)
Step 1 — check it's a valid PMF. Why this step? A table is only a distribution if all entries are and sum to ; otherwise everything downstream is meaningless.
Step 2 — marginal of (sum each row). Why this step? — " and anything" is the Law of Total Probability over the -values.
Step 3 — marginal of (sum each column).
Step 4 — the conditional. Why this step? Freeze : look only at that column , then divide by its total to re-normalize the slice (see Conditional Probability).
Step 5 — independence test. Why this step? Independence is a statement about the joint factoring, never about marginals alone. Test one cell. One matching cell is not enough — check another: Since one cell fails, are dependent.
Verify: rows sum to (total ); columns to (total ); conditional column sums to . ✔
Example 2 — The independent case (Cell C2)
Step 1 — build the joint by multiplying. Why this step? Independence of Random Variables means — the joint is literally the outer product of the marginals.
Step 2 — check the total.
Step 3 — the tell-tale of independence: conditional = marginal. Why this step? Under independence, knowing tells you nothing about , so the slice equals the marginal.
Verify: conditional equals the marginal exactly — the fingerprint of independence. ✔
Example 3 — Continuous, rectangular support (Cell C3)
Step 1 — find from total probability . Why this step? Every density must integrate to over its support; that pins the constant.
Step 2 — marginal of (integrate out , constant bounds to ). Why this step? ; the rectangle means always runs the full .
Step 3 — marginal of (by symmetry).
Step 4 — conditional. Why this step? Divide the joint by the marginal of the conditioning variable.
Step 5 — independent? So dependent — even on a clean square, an additive density does not factor.
Verify: ✔; for every ✔.
Example 4 — Continuous, triangular support (Cell C4)

Step 1 — read the bounds off the picture. Why this step? The region is : for a fixed , runs from up to ; for a fixed , runs from to . Constant bounds would give the wrong answer. Look at the amber slice in the figure.
Step 2 — confirm total .
Step 3 — marginal of (for fixed , from to ).
Step 4 — marginal of (for fixed , from to ).
Step 5 — conditional of given . Why this step? We want , so condition on . Divide joint by ; the support becomes .
Step 6 — the requested probability at .
Verify: ✔; the numeric answer is re-checked below.
Example 5 — Degenerate / zero conditioning (Cell C5)
Step 1 — evaluate the marginal at the conditioning value. Why this step? The conditional is only defined where .
Step 2 — declare it undefined. Both give a or " over -support" situation:
Verify: and the support requires , so has zero density — both conditionals are undefined. ✔ (No numeric answer; the "answer" is undefined.)
Example 6 — Limiting behaviour (Cell C6)

Step 1 — write the conditional of given . Why this step? Condition on this time: divide joint by , support .
Step 2 — limit . A wide, gently increasing slope over the full interval — the picture's cyan curve.
Step 3 — limit . Why this step? Look at the shape: on the shrinking interval the density is . Its peak at is , but its width is . The mass stays but concentrates into a spike at . So as the slice becomes an ever-taller, ever-narrower spike (a "point mass forming"), even though at itself the object is undefined (Example 5). The amber curves in the figure show this squeeze.
Verify: area under is for all ; limit at gives . ✔
Example 7 — Real-world word problem (Cell C7)
Step 1 — check validity & get . Why this step? We condition on , so we need the weight of that column. Total ✔.
Step 2 — conditional distribution of given . Why this step? Slice the column and re-normalize by .
Step 3 — answer the headline question. Compare baseline . Buying a pastry raises the chance of 2 coffees () — they go together.
Step 4 — conditional expectation (see Expectation and Variance). Why this step? Expected value under the conditional distribution weights each coffee-count by its conditional probability.
Verify: conditional probs ✔; and re-checked below.
Example 8 — Exam twist: rebuild the joint (Cell C8)
Step 1 — chain rule to get the joint. Why this step? — multiply the slice by the weight of the thing you conditioned on. A flat density of height on the triangle .
Step 2 — sanity: does it integrate to ?
Step 3 — marginal of (integrate out ; for fixed , runs ).
Step 4 — reverse conditional (Bayes direction). Why this step? Now we want given : divide the joint by . That's uniform on — the mirror of the forward "uniform on ".
Verify: joint integrates to ✔; ✔; ✔.
Recall Which cell was hardest — and why
Cell C5 (degenerate). It looks answerable because you can "plug in", but conditioning on a zero-density value is genuinely undefined — the algebra hides a . Never skip the "is ?" check.
Recall
Marginal of from a triangle joint on with
Why is undefined for ?
Independence fingerprint in the discrete table
Chain rule to rebuild a joint from a conditional and a marginal
As for on , what happens?
Connections
- Joint distributions — joint PMF - PDF, marginal, conditional — the parent whose machinery every example here exercises.
- Conditional Probability — the slice-and-renormalize rule behind every conditional above.
- Independence of Random Variables — tested in Examples 1–3.
- Law of Total Probability — the justification for summing/integrating to get marginals.
- Bayes' Theorem — the reversal direction in Example 8.
- Expectation and Variance — conditional expectation in Example 7.
- Covariance and Correlation — natural next step once you can compute joint moments.
- Bivariate Normal Distribution — the continuous joint you'll meet next.