Goal: spot karo ki kaunsa rule fire karta hai. Koi bhari algebra nahi.
Recall Solution 1.1
(a) Expectation linear hai, isliye constants seedhe nikal aate hain:
E[3X−2]=3E[X]−2=3(4)−2=10.(b) Variance ke liye shift −2 gayab ho jaata hai (poori picture ko left/right slide karne se spread nahi badlta) aur multiplier 3squared ho jaata hai:
Var(3X−2)=32Var(X)=9⋅9=81.(c) Standard deviation square root hoti hai: SD(3X−2)=81=9. Equivalently ∣3∣⋅SD(X)=3⋅9=3⋅3=9. ✓
Recall Solution 1.2
Ek 0/1 (indicator) variable ka E[X]=p aur Var(X)=p(1−p) hota hai (dekho Bernoulli and Binomial Distributions).
E[X]=0.2,Var(X)=0.2⋅0.8=0.16.p(1−p) kyun? Kyunki 0/1 variable ke liye X2=X hota hai, isliye E[X2]=p, aur Var=E[X2]−(E[X])2=p−p2.
Recall Solution 1.3
(a) False. Expectation ki linearity hamesha hold karti hai — dependent variables ke liye bhi. Ise kabhi independence ki zaroorat nahi padti.
(b) True (essentially). Sum rule ek extra term 2Cov(X,Y) carry karta hai. Independence Cov=0 force karta hai, isliye do variances simply add ho jaate hain. (Strictly, uncorrelated hona kaafi hai — lekin independence ise guarantee karta hai.)
E[X]=1(0.7)+0(0.3)=0.7.E[X2]=12(0.7)+02(0.3)=0.7(kyunki X2=X 0/1 variable ke liye).Var(X)=E[X2]−(E[X])2=0.7−0.49=0.21.σ=0.21≈0.4583.
Recall Solution 2.2
Center of mass (har value apni probability se weighted):
E[X]=0(0.1)+1(0.2)+2(0.3)+3(0.4)=0+0.2+0.6+1.2=2.0.Second moment LOTUS se g(x)=x2 ke saath:
E[X2]=0(0.1)+1(0.2)+4(0.3)+9(0.4)=0+0.2+1.2+3.6=5.0.Variance computational formula se:
Var(X)=5.0−2.02=5.0−4.0=1.0.σ=1.0=1.0.
Recall Solution 2.3
Mean:E[Y]=−4E[X]+7=−4(2.0)+7=−1.Variance: multiplier square ho jaata hai (isliye sign gayab ho jaata hai) aur +7 shift kuch nahi karta:
Var(Y)=(−4)2Var(X)=16⋅1.0=16.SD:σY=∣−4∣⋅σX=4⋅1.0=4.0. Absolute value wahi cheez hai jo σY≥0 rakhti hai chahe a=−4 negative ho.
Neeche ki figure dikhati hai kyun sign drop ho jaata hai aur shift spread ke liye invisible hai.
Goal: reason karo ki rule kab bend karta hai, aur combined variables ke baare mein.
Recall Solution 3.1
X+X=2X, isliye scale rule se
Var(X+X)=Var(2X)=22Var(X)=4⋅5=20.
Naively variances add karne se milta hai Var(X)+Var(X)=5+5=10.
Ye isliye differ karte hain kyunki sum rule ko independence chahiye, aur X apne aap se perfectly correlated hai. Missing piece hai 2Cov(X,X)=2Var(X)=2⋅5=10, aur indeed 10+10=20. ✓
Recall Solution 3.2
Var(aX+bY)=a2Var(X)+b2Var(Y)+2abCov(X,Y) use karo.
(a)a=b=1: Var(X+Y)=4+9+2(1)(1)(−3)=13−6=7.(b)a=1,b=−1: cross term sign flip karta hai kyunki 2ab=2(1)(−1)=−2:
Var(X−Y)=4+9+2(1)(−1)(−3)=13+6=19.(c) Agar independent hote, toh Cov=0, isliye dono4+9=13 ho jaate. Dhyan do ki subtraction phir bhi variances add karta hai — spread accumulate hoti hai chahe tum random quantities add karo ya subtract.
Recall Solution 3.3
Independence variances ko add karne deta hai: Var(S)=Var(X1)+Var(X2)=1235+1235=1270=635≈5.833.
Average ke liye, pehle scale karo phir independence use karo:
Var(Xˉ)=Var(21S)=41Var(S)=41⋅635=2435≈1.458.
Average kam spread hai ek single roll se — Law of Large Numbers ka seed: kai independent copies ka average variance 1/n ki tarah shrink karta hai.
Z=aX+b likho jahan a=σ1=51 aur b=−σμ=−550=−10.
Mean:E[Z]=51E[X]−10=51(50)−10=10−10=0.Variance:Var(Z)=(51)2Var(X)=251⋅25=1.
Isliye kisi bhi variable ko mean 0, variance 1 ke standard form mein reshape kiya ja sakta hai — Central Limit Theorem mein use hone wala standard form. μ subtract karna use center karta hai; σ se divide karna spread ko exactly 1 par rescale karta hai.
Recall Solution 4.2
Equal weights. Independence ke saath cross term 0 hai:
Var(0.5X+0.5Y)=0.52(4)+0.52(16)=0.25(4)+0.25(16)=1+4=5.Optimal weight.W=wX+(1−w)Y ke liye (independent),
Var(W)=w2(4)+(1−w)2(16).
Differentiate karo aur zero set karo (calculus is upward parabola ka bottom dhundhta hai — flat point jahan slope =0):
dwd[4w2+16(1−w)2]=8w−32(1−w)=0⟹8w−32+32w=0⟹40w=32⟹w=0.8.
Minimum variance: Var(W)=0.82(4)+0.22(16)=0.64(4)+0.04(16)=2.56+0.64=3.2.
Dhyan do ki safer asset (Var=4) ko bada weight 0.8 milta hai — total spread kam karne ke liye tum calmer variable par zyada rely karte ho.
Goal: definitions se prove karo; memorised results mein plug-in mat karo.
Recall Solution 5.1
Maano V=aX+b. Linearity se E[V]=aμ+b jahan μ=E[X]. Tab
V−E[V]=(aX+b)−(aμ+b)=a(X−μ).+bcancel ho jaata hai — yahi wajah hai ki shift spread nahi badal sakta. Ab square karo aur expectation lo:
Var(V)=E[a2(X−μ)2]=a2E[(X−μ)2]=a2Var(X),
constant a2 ko linearity se bahar kheenchte hue. ■
Recall Solution 5.2
Linearity se expand karo, c ko constant treat karte hue:
M(c)=E[X2]−2cE[X]+c2.
Yeh c mein ek upward parabola hai. Differentiate karo aur zero set karo:
M′(c)=−2E[X]+2c=0⟹c=E[X].
(Second derivative M′′(c)=2>0 minimum confirm karta hai.) c=μ=E[X] wapas plug karo:
M(μ)=E[X2]−2μ⋅μ+μ2=E[X2]−μ2=Var(X).
Isliye mean squared error ke under X ka sabse best constant predictor mean hai, aur unavoidable leftover error exactly variance hai. ■
Recall Solution 5.3
Computational formula se, E[X2]−(E[X])2=Var(X). Variance non-negative quantity (X−μ)2 ka average hai, isliye Var(X)≥0, jo deta hai
E[X2]≥(E[X])2.Equality tab hold hoti hai jab Var(X)=0, yaani jab (X−μ)2=0 probability 1 ke saath — matlab X ek constant hai (bilkul koi randomness nahi). Yeh convex function g(x)=x2 ke liye Jensen's Inequality ka sabse simple instance hai: pehle average karna phir square karna, pehle square karna phir average karne se kam nikalta hai. ■
Var(3X-2) jab Var(X)=9 ::: 81
Var(X+X) jab Var(X)=5 ::: 20
Var(X-Y), independent, Var(X)=4, Var(Y)=9 ::: 13
Best constant predictor c jo E[(X-c)^2] minimise kare ::: c = E[X]
X-mu ko kis quantity se divide karo taaki Var = 1 ho ::: sigma (the SD, variance nahi)
E[X^2]-(E[X])^2 ki value ::: Var(X), hamesha >= 0