Here we only ask: is this a convolution, and what are the two pieces? No heavy integration yet.
Recall Solution L1.1
The test: in a convolution the two arguments must ==add up to t== (τ+(t−τ)=t), and the upper limit must be t.
(a) Arguments are τ and t−τ — they add to t. Limits are 0 to t. ✅ This is a convolution with f(τ)=τ2 (so f(t)=t2) and g(t−τ)=t−τ (so g(t)=t).
(b) Both factors use τ, τ — arguments are τ and τ, they do not add to t. ❌ Just an ordinary integral, not a convolution.
(c) Upper limit is ∞, not t. ❌ Not the causal convolution we defined (it's a different object).
Answer: only (a); f(t)=t2,g(t)=t.
Recall Solution L1.2
Split the product.s3(s−2)1=F(s)s31⋅G(s)s−21.
Recall the standard pairs (from Laplace Transform — definition and properties):
L−1{s31}=2t2=f(t),L−1{s−21}=e2t=g(t).Why t2/2? Because L{tn}=n!/sn+1, so L{t2}=2/s3, and we need to divide by 2.
Apply the theorem:L−1{s3(s−2)1}=∫0t2τ2e2(t−τ)dτ.
Done — this is the requested convolution form.
Now we actually compute convolutions and use the theorem forwards and backwards.
Recall Solution L2.1
Direct. Here f(t)=1,g(t)=1:
(1∗1)(t)=∫0t1⋅1dτ=[τ]0t=t.Theorem check.L{1}=s1, so the product in the s-world is s1⋅s1=s21, and L−1{1/s2}=t. ✅ Same answer.
This is the cleanest proof that convolution ≠ pointwise product: 1⋅1=1 but 1∗1=t.
Recall Solution L2.2
f(t)=t,g(t)=et. By commutativity (f∗g=g∗f) put the easier-to-integrate factor with the flip. Let's keep f(τ)=τ:
(t∗et)(t)=∫0tτet−τdτ=et∫0tτe−τdτ.Why pull out et? Because et−τ=ete−τ and et is constant with respect to the running clock τ.
Integrate by parts (u=τ,dv=e−τdτ,v=−e−τ):
∫0tτe−τdτ=[−τe−τ]0t+∫0te−τdτ=−te−t+[−e−τ]0t=−te−t−e−t+1.
Multiply back by et:
(t∗et)(t)=et(1−e−t−te−t)=et−1−t.Sanity via theorem:L{t}L{et}=s21⋅s−11, and L{et−1−t}=s−11−s1−s21. Common denominator s2(s−1): numerator s2−s(s−1)−(s−1)=s2−s2+s−s+1=1. So it equals s2(s−1)1. ✅
Recall Solution L2.3
Split: s1⋅s2+41. Inverses: L−1{1/s}=1 and L−1{1/(s2+4)}=21sin2t (since L{sinat}=a/(s2+a2), here a=2, so we divide by 2).
L−1=∫0t1⋅21sin(2(t−τ))dτ=21∫0tsin(2t−2τ)dτ.
Let w=2t−2τ,dw=−2dτ; as τ:0→t, w:2t→0:
=21⋅2−1[−cosw]...⇒21[2cos(2t−2τ)]0t=41(cos0−cos2t)=41(1−cos2t).Check:L{41(1−cos2t)}=41(s1−s2+4s)=41⋅s(s2+4)(s2+4)−s2=41⋅s(s2+4)4=s(s2+4)1. ✅
Now we combine convolution with ODEs and dissect why each step works.
Recall Solution L3.1
Take Laplace, using L{y′′}=s2Y−sy(0)−y′(0)=s2Y (both zero):
s2Y+4Y=F(s)⇒Y=transfer function H(s)s2+41F(s).Y is a product of two s-functions, so its inverse is a convolution:
y(t)=h(t)∗f(t),h(t)=L−1{H(s)}=21sin2t.Why this is beautiful:h(t)=21sin2t is the system's response to a unit impulse. Any input f produces
y(t)=21∫0tsin(2(t−τ))f(τ)dτ
— the output is the input, smeared by the impulse response. That "smearing" is convolution.
Recall Solution L3.2
Spot the convolution.∫0t(t−τ)y(τ)dτ=(t∗y)(t) because arguments t−τ and τ add to t. (See Volterra Integral Equations.)
Laplace both sides.L{et}=s−11, L{t}=s21, and convolution → product:
Y=s−11+s21Y.Solve algebraically (this is the whole point — the integral became algebra):
Y(1−s21)=s−11⇒Y⋅s2s2−1=s−11⇒Y=(s−1)(s2−1)s2.
Note s2−1=(s−1)(s+1), so Y=(s−1)2(s+1)s2. Partial fractions (see Inverse Laplace Transform — partial fractions):
(s−1)2(s+1)s2=s−1A+(s−1)2B+s+1C.
s=1: B(1+1)=1⇒B=21.
s=−1: C(−1−1)2=1⇒C⋅4=1⇒C=41.
Compare s2 coefficients: A+C=1⇒A=1−41=43.
Y=s−13/4+(s−1)21/2+s+11/4.
Invert term by term:
y(t)=43et+21tet+41e−t.Spot check at t=0:y(0)=43+0+41=1=e0. And the RHS at t=0 is e0+0=1. ✅
Multi-step problems where you must assemble several ideas.
Recall Solution L4.1
Laplace with y(0)=0,y′(0)=1: L{y′′}=s2Y−s⋅0−1=s2Y−1.
s2Y−1+Y=s2+11⇒(s2+1)Y=1+s2+11.Y=from initial velocitys2+11+driven part(s2+1)21.First term inverts to sint. Second term is a product s2+11⋅s2+11, so it's sint∗sint. From the parent note (App 2):
sint∗sint=21(sint−tcost).
Add:
y(t)=sint+21sint−21tcost=23sint−21tcost.Check IVs:y(0)=0 ✅. y′(t)=23cost−21cost+21tsint=cost+21tsint, so y′(0)=1 ✅.
Recall Solution L4.2
Way 1 — convolution. Split (s2+1)2s=s2+1s⋅s2+11. Inverses: L−1{s/(s2+1)}=cost, L−1{1/(s2+1)}=sint. So we need cost∗sint:
cost∗sint=∫0tcosτsin(t−τ)dτ.
Product-to-sum: cosτsin(t−τ)=21[sint−sin(2τ−t)] (using sinXcosY=21[sin(X+Y)+sin(X−Y)] with X=t−τ,Y=τ).
=21∫0tsintdτ−21∫0tsin(2τ−t)dτ=21tsint−21[2−cos(2τ−t)]0t.
The second bracket: −21(−21)[cost−cos(−t)]=41[cost−cost]=0.
⇒cost∗sint=21tsint.Way 2 — known transform.L{tsint}=(s2+1)22s (differentiate L{cost} trick / table). Hence L−1{s/(s2+1)2}=21tsint.
Agree: both give 21tsint. ✅
Open-ended, structural, or general-parameter problems.
Recall Solution L5.1
General ω>0. Laplace with zero IVs: (s2+ω2)Y=F(s), so
Y=s2+ω21F(s).
Now L−1{1/(s2+ω2)}=ω1sinωt (because L{sinωt}=ω/(s2+ω2), so we divide by ω). This is the impulse response h(t). The product H(s)F(s) inverts to the convolution:
y(t)=h∗f=ω1∫0tsin(ω(t−τ))f(τ)dτ.■Degenerate ω→0. The equation becomes y′′=f(t). Take the limit inside the kernel: as ω→0, ωsin(ω(t−τ))→(t−τ) (since sinx≈x for small x). So
y(t)→∫0t(t−τ)f(τ)dτ.Interpretation / check:y′′=f with zero IVs means integrate f twice; and indeed ∫0t(t−τ)f(τ)dτ is exactly the double antiderivative (differentiate once ⇒ ∫0tf(τ)dτ, twice ⇒ f(t)). ✅ The kernel degrades gracefully — no blow-up.
Recall Solution L5.2
y(t)=∫0te−(t−τ)⋅1dτ=e−t∫0teτdτ=e−t(et−1)=1−e−t.Near t=0:1−e−t≈t (rises linearly from 0 — the system hasn't "filled up" yet). y(0)=0: no output before any input has accumulated.
As t→∞:e−t→0, so y→1. The output saturates at the input level — a classic first-order "charging" curve. This is the frequency-domain cousin's step response.
Cross-check via theorem:H(s)=s+11, F(s)=s1, product s(s+1)1=s1−s+11, inverse 1−e−t. ✅
Recall Solution L5.3
For t>ϵ:
(f∗gϵ)(t)=∫0tf(t−τ)gϵ(τ)dτ=ϵ1∫0ϵf(t−τ)dτ.Why only [0,ϵ]? Because gϵ(τ)=0 for τ>ϵ — the kernel is a thin, tall pulse of area 1.
That last integral is the average of f over a window of width ϵ ending at t. As ϵ→0, the average of a continuous function over a shrinking window converges to the point value:
limϵ→0(f∗gϵ)(t)=f(t).Interpretation: the unit-area pulse acts as the identity of convolution — convolving with it returns f unchanged. That's exactly the role of the Dirac delta: f∗δ=f. Every impulse-response derivation in L3/L5.1 secretly relies on this.