LOOK-UP. The atom s−a1 inverts to eat. Here the denominator is s−(−4), so a=−4:
L−1{s+41}=e−4t.
The negative a means decay — the function shrinks as t grows.
LOOK-UP. The sine atom is s2+ω2ω. Here ω2=9⇒ω=3, so the sine numerator should be 3. We have 6=2⋅3, so factor a 2 out:
L−1{s2+96}=2⋅L−1{s2+93}=2sin3t.
First-shift theorem. Start from the base atom s21→t (this is sn+11→n!tn with n=1). Replacing s→s−3 multiplies the answer by e3t:
L−1{(s−3)21}=te3t.
SPLIT (distinct linear poles). Write (s+1)(s−3)s−1=s+1A+s−3B.
Cover-up at s=−1: A=−1−3−1−1=−4−2=21.
Cover-up at s=3: B=3+13−1=42=21.
LOOK-UP each s−a1→eat:
f(t)=21e−t+21e3t=21(e−t+e3t).
Predict the form first, then find L−1{s2−13}. Look at the figure: real poles → exponential/hyperbolic, not oscillation.
Recall Solution 3.2
Predict:s2−1=(s−1)(s+1) has real roots ±1. Real poles mean growing/decaying exponentials, which combine into sinh/cosh — no wiggling sine. Compare with s2+1 (roots off the real axis) which would give sin/cos. The figure shows both.
SPLIT:(s−1)(s+1)3=s−1A+s+1B.
Cover-up: A=1+13=23, B=−1−13=−23.
LOOK-UP:f(t)=23et−23e−t=3⋅2et−e−t=3sinht.
Confirmed: hyperbolic sine, exactly as predicted.
COMPLETE the square:s2+4s+13=(s+2)2+9, so a=−2, ω2=9⇒ω=3.
SPLIT numerator around (s+2): we want an (s+2) (for cosine) plus a leftover (for sine):
(s+2)2+9s+7=(s+2)2+9(s+2)+5=(s+2)2+9s+2+(s+2)2+95.LOOK-UP with the shift atoms:
SPLIT. The double pole (s+1)2 needs two terms; the simple pole (s+2) needs one:
(s+1)2(s+2)2s+3=s+1A+(s+1)2B+s+2C.
Multiply through by (s+1)2(s+2):
2s+3=A(s+1)(s+2)+B(s+2)+C(s+1)2.
Set s=−1: 2(−1)+3=1=B(1)⇒B=1.
Set s=−2: 2(−2)+3=−1=C(1)⇒C=−1.
Compare s2-coefficients: 0=A+C⇒A=1.
LOOK-UP:s+11→e−t, (s+1)21→te−t (shift of s21→t), s+21→e−2t:
f(t)=e−t+te−t−e−2t=(1+t)e−t−e−2t.
CHECK proper first. Degree of numerator (2) = degree of denominator (2): this is improper. Do polynomial long division:
s2+1s2+2s+3=1+s2+12s+2.LOOK-UP:
L−1{1}=δ(t) (the Dirac delta — the inverse of a constant).
Solve y′′+4y=0 with y(0)=1,y′(0)=6 using Laplace transforms. Report y(t).
Recall Solution 5.1
Transform the ODE (recall L{y′′}=s2Y−sy(0)−y′(0), from Solving ODEs with Laplace Transforms):
s2Y−s(1)−6+4Y=0⇒(s2+4)Y=s+6⇒Y=s2+4s+6.SPLIT / LOOK-UP with ω=2:
Y=s2+4s+s2+46=s2+4s+3⋅s2+42.y(t)=cos2t+3sin2t.Sanity check:y(0)=cos0+3sin0=1 ✓, and y′(t)=−2sin2t+6cos2t gives y′(0)=6 ✓.
Find L−1{s2(s2+1)1} by partial fractions, then confirm the s21⋅s2+11 structure agrees with the Convolution Theorem.
Recall Solution 5.2
SPLIT. With only even powers, write s2(s2+1)1=sA+s2B+s2+1Cs+D. Multiply out:
1=As(s2+1)+B(s2+1)+(Cs+D)s2.
Match coefficients: s0:B=1; s1:A=0; s2:B+D=0⇒D=−1; s3:A+C=0⇒C=0.
So s2(s2+1)1=s21−s2+11.
LOOK-UP:s21→t, s2+11→sint:
f(t)=t−sint.Convolution cross-check.L−1{s21}=t and L−1{s2+11}=sint, so the product transform inverts to the convolution
(t)∗(sint)=∫0tτsin(t−τ)dτ=t−sint,
which matches. Two roads, one answer — that's the reassurance the theorem gives.