4.6.28 · D4Ordinary Differential Equations

Exercises — Laplace of derivatives — key property for solving ODEs

1,779 words8 min readBack to topic

Throughout, and . Recall the three facts we lean on for inverting:

  • ,
  • ,

Level 1 — Recognition

L1.1

State and from memory.

Recall Solution

Read the shape: one factor of per prime removed, and each derivative you remove "pays a fee" of an initial value. For the two fees are (higher -power, lower derivative) and (lower -power, higher derivative).

L1.2

In , what is the coefficient of ?

Recall Solution

The general rule is The term carrying is , so the coefficient is . Check with : gives (the term); gives (the term). ✓


Level 2 — Application

L2.1

Given so , compute two ways and confirm they agree.

Recall Solution

Way A — differentiate first. , so . Way B — use the rule. , so Both give . ✓ The was essential — without it we'd get , which is wrong.

L2.2

Given (so ), compute with the rule and verify against direct differentiation.

Recall Solution

. Rule: Direct check: , and . ✓

L2.3

Compute for using the second-derivative rule.

Recall Solution

Here , , so . Direct check: , . ✓


Level 3 — Analysis

L3.1

For which functions is exactly true (the boundary term vanishes)? Give the condition and one concrete example.

Recall Solution

The boundary term is , so it vanishes precisely when . Example: has , so . Check directly: , . ✓ Insight: the "clean" formula is not universally wrong — it is a special case that happens exactly at the origin-crossing. It fails the instant your function starts away from zero.

L3.2

A function is of exponential order: for large . Explain, referring to the figure, why the boundary term at dies for , so only survives.

Figure — Laplace of derivatives — key property for solving ODEs
Recall Solution

The boundary term in the integration by parts is . Look at the figure: the orange curve crushes downward exponentially, while the blue grows at most like . Their product is bounded by (the green envelope), which as whenever . So the top limit contributes . Only the bottom limit remains, giving . This is the entire reason the formula reads and not something with a surviving tail. If the integral would diverge and the transform wouldn't exist — see Exponential Order and Convergence of Integrals.

L3.3

Show, by re-deriving with Integration by Parts, that the second-derivative rule really follows from applying the first-derivative rule to .

Recall Solution

Let . The first rule applies to any nice function, so Now , , and . Substitute: Why it works: the rule "removes one prime for one and one fee." Removing two primes just runs the same move twice — no new integration needed. That is the inductive engine behind the general pattern.


Level 4 — Synthesis

L4.1

Solve using Laplace. Give and .

Recall Solution

Transform: . Solve: . Invert: , so . Check: , ✓; ✓.

L4.2

Solve .

Recall Solution

Transform: . Insert ICs: . Solve: . Invert: this is exactly , so . Check: , so ✓; ✓, ✓.

L4.3

Solve the forced equation using partial fractions (see Inverse Laplace Transform and Partial Fractions).

Recall Solution

Transform: , so . Partial fractions: . Multiply out: . Set : . Set : . Invert: . Check: , ✓; ✓; equilibrium as (matches RHS/coeff ) ✓.


Level 5 — Mastery

L5.1

Solve the second-order IVP with both ICs nonzero: .

Recall Solution

Transform each term using the rules:

Sum : Factor: , so . Partial fractions: . Then . Set : . Set : . Check: , ; ✓; ✓; ✓.

L5.2

Solve , and identify which single IC each surviving term traces back to.

Recall Solution

Transform: . Tracing the ICs: the term vanished because — that removed any piece. The term is the sole survivor, and it produced the amplitude . So the slope IC alone shaped this answer. Check: ✓; ✓; ✓.

L5.3 (edge case)

A degenerate/limiting problem: solve with Laplace, and note what happens as the "spring constant" in shrinks to .

Recall Solution

Transform: Invert: , , so Check: , ✓; ✓; ✓. Limiting insight: for the frequency is . As , and , so the oscillation "unrolls" into the straight line . The case is the degenerate limit where the two initial conditions map straight to the intercept and slope of a line — no oscillation at all.


Recall One-line self-test summary

Every solution above passed three checks: the ODE itself, the value IC, and (for 2nd order) the slope IC. If any check fails, you almost certainly dropped a fee term .

Connections