4.6.18 · D4 · HinglishOrdinary Differential Equations

ExercisesFrobenius method — regular singular points

2,815 words13 min read↑ Read in English

4.6.18 · D4 · Maths › Ordinary Differential Equations › Frobenius method — regular singular points

Shuru karne se pehle, ek picture jo poora game fix kar degi tumhare dimag mein.

Figure — Frobenius method — regular singular points

Horizontal axis root difference hai. Jahan yeh us axis par land karta hai woh decide karta hai teen solution shapes mein se kaun sa tumhe likhna hai — koi bhi coefficient compute karne se bahut pehle.


Level 1 — Recognition

Goal: coefficients padho aur point classify karo. Abhi koi series nahi.

Exercise 1.1

ke liye, kya ordinary hai, regular singular point hai, ya irregular? Agar regular hai, toh aur batao.

Recall Solution 1.1

Standard form. se divide karo: Toh , .

Tamed pair kyun check karein? ki tarah blow up karta hai aur ki tarah — worst allowed rates. Un bilkul powers se multiply karo: Dono constants hain, isliye par analytic hain, toh ek regular singular point hai.

Limits read karo: , .

(Yeh actually ek Euler–Cauchy equation disguise mein hai — iska Frobenius series term ke baad terminate ho jaata hai kyunki mein koi higher powers nahi hain.)

Exercise 1.2

ke liye classify karo.

Recall Solution 1.2

Yahan hai, toh , jo par phir bhi blow up karta hai — analytic nahi. Kyunki analytic hone mein fail ho raha hai, ek irregular singular point hai. Consequence: Frobenius method yahan kaam karne ki guarantee nahi deta; indicial machinery cleanly apply bhi nahi hoti. Yeh woh "blow-up too strong for a single to balance" case hai jo parent note mein flag kiya gaya hai.

Exercise 1.3

Kisi RSP ke indicial roots , nikle. Yeh teen cases mein se kaun sa case hai, aur second solution ka shape possibly kaisa hona chahiye?

Recall Solution 1.3

Root difference , ek positive integer. Yeh Case 3 hai. Second solution ko shayad logarithm ki zaroorat ho sakti hai: Abhi hum nahi bata sakte ki hai ya nahi — uske liye actually step par recurrence run karni hogi.


Level 2 — Application

Goal: indicial equation banao aur solve karo; case identify karo.

Exercise 2.1

ke indicial roots nikalo aur case batao.

Recall Solution 2.1

Standard form: se divide karo: Toh aur ; dono analytic → RSP.

Tamed limits: , aur .

Indicial equation : Factor karo: , toh , . Difference: Case 1, do clean Frobenius series, koi log nahi.

Exercise 2.2

(Bessel order ) ke liye indicial roots aur case nikalo.

Recall Solution 2.2

, . Toh , ; dono analytic → RSP. , . Toh , . Difference , ek positive integerCase 3. Interesting: yahan log coefficient nikalta hai (yeh exactly woh "integer difference but no log" wala surprise hai). Dekho Bessel's equation and Bessel functions.

Exercise 2.3

ke indicial roots nikalo.

Recall Solution 2.3

, . , ; dono analytic → RSP. , . Double root Case 2 (equal roots) → mein logarithm forced hai.


Level 3 — Analysis

Goal: poori recurrence run karo aur ek explicit series produce karo.

Exercise 3.1

ko poori tarah solve karo — recurrence se dono Frobenius series banao. (Indicial roots parent note mein nikale gaye the.)

Recall Solution 3.1

Setup. Multiply-free form: . insert karo.

  • (index shift : )

ka coefficient ke liye: Bracket indicial polynomial hai. Toh

Branch : , aur , toh ke saath: , , .

Branch : , aur , toh ke saath: , , . Kyunki difference hai, yeh dono automatically independent hain — Wronskian and linear independence se verify karo agar chahte ho.

Exercise 3.2

ke liye, indicial roots aur recurrence nikalo, phir bade root se shuru hone wali Frobenius solution ke pehle teen nonzero terms do.

Recall Solution 3.2

Standard form: . Toh , → RSP, . Indicial: (Case 2).

ke saath insert karo mein:

Pehle do combine karte hain: . Teesre ko se shift karo: . ka coefficient: (odd terms zero ho jaate hain). ke saath: Second solution mein hoga (Case 2) — use Reduction of order se obtain karo.


Level 4 — Synthesis

Goal: log-bearing cases handle karo aur independence confirm karo.

Exercise 4.1

(Bessel order 0) ke liye, roots equal hain toh . nikalo given ki aur free hai (lo ).

Recall Solution 4.1

Strategy. substitute karo, jahan hai, mein.

Log part handle karo. Kisi bhi smooth ke liye, agar toh ko mein plug karo: Bracket zero hai kyunki ODE solve karta hai — yahi log ansatz ka poora point hai: equation se nikal jaata hai aur ek clean forcing term chhod jaata hai.

Toh ki equation hai ke saath, , toh .

Left side ke saath: match karo: (hamare free choice ke saath consistent). match karo: (Yeh normalization tak standard ka leading term hai.)

Exercise 4.2

Roots integer se differ karte hain: Roots nikalo, phir determine karo ki log coefficient forced nonzero hai ya nahi — critical step par recurrence test karke.

Recall Solution 4.2

Standard form: , toh , . Phir , ; dono analytic → RSP. , . Indicial: , . Difference Case 3.

Recurrence. ko mein insert karo: ka coefficient:

Chhota root try karo: . par: , matlab . Lekin contradiction. Recurrence aage nahi chal sakti → log zaroor aayega, toh .

Bada root clean series deta hai: , toh , .


Level 5 — Mastery

Goal: justification ke saath poori independent solution, aur independence ki structure.

Exercise 5.1

ko completely solve karo: point classify karo, dono indicial roots nikalo, reasoning ke saath case decide karo, recurrence likho, aur bade root par solution ke leading terms do.

Recall Solution 5.1

Standard form: se divide karo: (analytic), (analytic) → RSP. , .

Indicial: . Difference Case 3.

Recurrence. ODE ko likho, insert karo: Bracket hai. Toh

Bada root : , , toh (odd terms vanish, kyunki par: ). ke saath: (Pehchano .) Toh exactly hai.

Log ke liye critical-step check. par, : ko chahiye hoga, forcing , jo hai — forcing vanish ho gayi! Toh : chhota root ek clean second series deta hai Independence: aur independent hain (inका Wronskian nonzero hai, bilkul ki tarah). Integer difference ke bawajood koi logarithm nahi — Case 3 with .

Exercise 5.2 (capstone)

Indicial polynomial use karke explain karo ki recurrence exactly tab blow up kyun karta hai jab ek non-negative integer ho — aur yeh teen cases sab exist karne ka deep reason kyun hai.

Recall Solution 5.2

Recurrence ko se multiply karta hai. Chhote root ke liye, yeh factor hai. Ab ke roots exactly aur hain, toh . Isliye Yeh zero hota hai exactly jab — possible tabhi jab ek non-negative integer ho.

  • : kabhi zero nahi hota → dono series clean (Case 1).
  • (): roots collide hote hain; ka double zero hai, toh ke respect mein differentiate karna (standard trick) ek drop karta hai (Case 2).
  • : → recurrence step par zero se divide karta hai. Agar wahan forcing nonzero hai, toh second solution ko rescue karta hai; agar woh zero ho jaaye, toh hum ke saath cleanly nikal jaate hain (Case 3).

Toh ek algebraic fact " zero ke equal ho sakta hai" hi saari branching ka source hai. Upar wala figure dekho: ka axis position literally batata hai ki zero denominator aa sakta hai ya nahi.


Active Recall

Recall Rapid self-test

Root difference , kaun sa case? ::: Case 1 (integer nahi) — do clean series, koi log nahi. Double indicial root, kya forced hai? ::: mein logarithm (Case 2). Case 3 mein step par kya check karna hai? ::: Kya forcing term vanish hoti hai; agar haan toh (log nahi), agar nahi toh (log). kyun hai aur kyun nahi? ::: Kyunki singular point par blow up karta hai; sirf tamed finite hota hai.