Worked examples — Bernoulli equations — substitution
This page is the exhaustive practice sheet for Bernoulli equations. The parent taught the machine; here we drive it over every road: positive powers, negative powers, fractions, the degenerate cases, an initial-value problem, a word problem, and an exam trap. Nothing here contradicts the parent — we just go wider and slower.
Before anything, recall the single object we work with. A Bernoulli equation is a first-order ODE that can be forced into the shape where depend only on , and the only thing that stops it being linear is the power . The cure (derived in the parent) is:
Here "" is shorthand for ("the rate at which changes as moves"), and means "the area-accumulating antiderivative". The letter is always the arbitrary constant that appears when we integrate.
The scenario matrix
Bernoulli problems differ along a few axes. If you can solve one example from each row, you can solve any Bernoulli equation an exam throws at you.
| Cell | What makes it different | Danger / lesson | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | a positive integer | expose = negative power | Ex 1 |
| C2 | a fraction | is itself a fractional power | Ex 2 |
| C3 | negative () | , back-substitution is a positive power | Ex 3 |
| C4 | Initial-value problem (find ) | must pin the constant, check the point | Ex 4 |
| C5 | Degenerate or | substitution useless — solve directly | Ex 5 |
| C6 | Lost solution (when ) | division by hides a singular solution | Ex 6 |
| C7 | Word / real-world model | translate story → Bernoulli, keep units | Ex 7 |
| C8 | Exam twist: disguised form + [[Riccati Equations | Riccati]] cousin | recognise it isn't standard until you rearrange |
We now hit every cell.
[!example] Ex 1 — Cell C1 · positive integer power
Solve (Work on .)
Forecast: Here , so . Because is a reciprocal, guess the final answer will read "", not "" directly.
- Identify. Why this step? The on the right flags Bernoulli; matching the standard form gives us the three ingredients the recipe needs.
- Divide by : Why this step? This exposes and creates the clump the chain rule will swallow.
- Substitute , so Why this step? This is the "engine" — it turns the awkward into a plain .
- Linear ODE. Replace: Why this step? Same as plugging into : and . Both agree. ✔
- Integrating factor. (on ). Then Why this step? Multiplying by makes the left side a perfect derivative , so we can just integrate. (On we'd use , giving the same ODE after cancelling.)
- Integrate & back-substitute. Since : Why this step? We integrate to recover , then undo the substitution because the recipe's Step 5 demands we translate back from the helper variable to the real unknown .
Verify: Take : , so . Plug into : . And . Both sides match. ✔
[!example] Ex 2 — Cell C2 · fractional power
Solve (the parent's Example 2, re-verified as our fraction case). We show all recipe steps this time.
Forecast: gives , so . The new variable is a square root, so at the end we'll square to get .
- Identify. Why this step? Written as , we read the constants directly.
- Divide by : Why this step? Exactly as in Ex 1 — expose and create the clump the chain rule will absorb. We do not skip this step.
- Substitute , so Why this step? This converts the awkward into a plain (the "engine").
- Linear ODE. Replace in Step 2: Why this step? Divide by . This matches the recipe formula with multiplying both and — the factor everyone forgets. ✔
- Integrating factor. Then Why this step? Turns the left into a single derivative.
- Integrate. Why this step? ; dividing by isolates .
- Back-substitute : Why this step? We must translate the helper back to ; squaring is legitimate here only because — see the branch note.
Verify: With , . For we have , so and . Then . Also . Equal on . ✔
[!example] Ex 3 — Cell C3 · genuinely negative power
Solve (here , a truly negative index).
Forecast: gives , so — a positive power this time. Since , the final answer will read "", and to get we take a cube root (odd root, so no ambiguity — every real number has exactly one real cube root).
- Identify. In standard form we read Why this step? The on the right is the Bernoulli power; is allowed since .
- Divide by (i.e. multiply by ): Substitute , so Why this step? Expose and turn into .
- Linear ODE. Replace: (Same as recipe with multiplying both and .) Why this step? Multiply by ; note is a positive power — the hallmark of the negative- case.
- Integrating factor. Then Why this step? Multiplying by collapses the left side to a single derivative .
- Integrate & isolate. Why this step? We integrate , then divide by to free .
- Back-substitute : Why this step? The recipe's Step 5: undo the helper. A cube root is single-valued over the reals, so no branch appears — unlike the square-root case of Ex 2.
Verify: With , , so . Original: and . Match. ✔ With general : differentiate to get , so . Then . ✔
[!example] Ex 4 — Cell C4 · initial-value problem
Solve with (Work on , which contains .)
Forecast: This is Ex-1's cousin but with a plus . We'll get a family , and the initial condition will pin one curve. At we have , so should come out a small tidy number.
- Identify & set up. so Why this step? Same Bernoulli shape; we prepare the substitution.
- Linear ODE. Why this step? Plug into the recipe formula.
- Integrating factor. (on ). Then Why this step? Perfect-derivative trick; the carries an absolute value, resolved by working on .
- General solution. Why this step? We integrate to get , multiply by to isolate , then undo so the answer is stated in the original unknown .
- Apply . Then : Why this step? The initial condition selects the one curve through the given point.
Verify: At : , so . ✔ Differentiate: . Check at : ; ; sum . And . Match. ✔
[!example] Ex 5 — Cell C5 · degenerate and
Two mini-problems that look Bernoulli but aren't. (Work on .)
(a) : Forecast: means , so the "" is invisible — this is already linear. No substitution.
- Why? Standard integrating factor; for either sign, so no branch issue here.
Verify: : . Then ✔
(b) : Forecast: would give (useless!). Instead collect : it's linear and separable.
- Rewrite: Why? All -terms together — the substitution is degenerate.
- Separable (see Separable Equations):
- Integrate: (with , and note the absolute value again).
Verify: , . Then ✔
[!example] Ex 6 — Cell C6 · the lost solution
Solve and account for every solution.
Forecast: This is Bernoulli with . Dividing by silently assumes — but does satisfy (both sides ). Watch for it.
- Note the constant solution first. Valid. Keep it aside. Why this step? Because Step 2 will divide by and erase it.
- Divide by : Substitute (), Why this step? Standard exposure of .
- Linear ODE. Why this step? makes it trivially integrable (no needed).
- Back-substitute : Why this step? Undo the helper . Since loses the sign of , solving for genuinely produces both signs — each is a legitimate branch, valid only where .
Verify: Take : (needs ), , . And . Match. ✔ Also gives . ✔
[!example] Ex 7 — Cell C7 · real-world word problem (logistic growth)
A fish population (in thousands) grows, but crowding limits it. It obeys the logistic law Start with thousand fish. Find using the Bernoulli method, and predict the long-run population.
Forecast: The crowding term makes this Bernoulli with . Because fish can't grow forever, expect thousand as . So the answer should flatten toward .
- Standard form. So Why this step? Isolate the linear on the left; identify .
- Substitute . Recipe: Why this step? multiplies both and ; the signs flip.
- Integrating factor. Then Why this step? Collapse the left to a derivative (no here, constant).
- Integrate. Why this step? ; divide by to isolate .
- Back-substitute : Apply Why this step? Undo the helper (populations are ), then use the starting count to fix .
The figure below plots this solution. Horizontal axis: time in years. Vertical axis: population in thousands of fish. The magenta S-curve climbs from the orange start point and flattens onto the violet dashed line (the carrying capacity). Qualitatively: growth is fast when the pond is nearly empty (the term dominates), then throttles as crowding — the term — bites. That flattening is the geometric meaning of the algebra we just did.

Verify (long-run & units): As , , so thousand . ✔ At : thousand, matching the initial count. ✔ Units: has units , so has units (thousand), matching ; and has units too. Both terms carry the same units as . ✔
[!example] Ex 8 — Cell C8 · exam twist (disguised, plus a Riccati sibling)
(a) Disguised Bernoulli. Solve It doesn't look like the standard form at all. (Work on .)
Forecast: The term means . Then , so — a positive power. Expect the answer as "", then a square root to recover .
- Rearrange to standard form. So Why this step? Move the linear term left; recognise as the Bernoulli power — the exam disguise is just the un-rearranged layout.
- Divide by (multiply by ): Substitute , so Why this step? Expose and turn into .
- Linear ODE. Replace: (Same as recipe with multiplying and .) Why this step? Multiply by to clear the .
- Integrating factor. (on ). Then Why this step? Perfect-derivative form; the carries , resolved by .
- Integrate & back-substitute. With : Why this step? We integrate to get , multiply by to isolate , then undo . Because discards the sign of , recovering needs both roots — each is a valid solution branch, defined only where .
Verify: : , take (the branch), so . Compare . Using : and . Sum . And . Match (the branch checks identically with ). ✔
(b) The Riccati sibling — why exams pair them. A Riccati equation has an extra constant/known-free term , so it is not Bernoulli. But if you already know one particular solution , the substitution turns a Riccati into a linear ODE in — the exact same "rename to linearise" spirit. When , Riccati collapses back to a Bernoulli with .
(No new numeric claim in (b) — recognition only.)
[!recall]- Quick self-test (reveal after guessing)
For , what is ?
In Ex 3 (), what power is ?
Why does Ex 3 need no but Ex 8 does?
Why did Ex 6 need a separate line for ?
In the logistic Ex 7, what is ?
When does Riccati reduce to Bernoulli?
Why do integrating factors need ?
Connections
- Bernoulli equations — substitution (parent — the method these examples exercise)
- Linear First-Order ODEs — Integrating Factor (every example ends here)
- Separable Equations (Ex 5b solved this way)
- Exact Equations and Integrating Factors
- Substitution Methods in ODEs (same rename-to-simplify idea)
- Riccati Equations (Ex 8b — the step up in nonlinearity)