4.6.3 · D4Ordinary Differential Equations

Exercises — Separable ODEs — technique, implicit solutions

3,417 words16 min readBack to topic

Level 1 — Recognition

Goal: decide "is this separable?" and, if so, name and — nothing more.

Exercise 1.1. For each, say separable or not. If separable, write and .

  • (a)
  • (b)
  • (c)
  • (d)
Recall Solution 1.1
  • (a) Separable. . The RHS is a pure- piece times a pure- piece.
  • (b) NOT separable. A sum cannot be written as (function of )(function of ). There is no factoring of a subtraction.
  • (c) Separable. .
  • (d) Separable. The exponent is a sum, and a sum in an exponent splits into a product: . So .

Exercise 1.2. In , list every value of that makes . These are the candidate equilibrium solutions.

Recall Solution 1.2

Here and . Set : either or . So the constant functions and are equilibrium solutions — they'll be erased the moment we divide by , so we record them now.


Level 2 — Application

Goal: run Separate → Integrate → Single constant on clean problems.

Exercise 2.1. Solve (general solution).

Recall Solution 2.1

Check for lost solutions first. Here . There is no making (since is never zero), and makes the RHS undefined — so is not a solution and solution curves never touch the -axis. We flag this because multiplying by (next step) would otherwise silently swallow a would-be constant solution. Separate (multiply both sides by , i.e. move all left, all right): Integrate both sides. Each side gains its own constant, but we collect them into a single arbitrary constant on the right: Single constant: one absorbs both. Multiply by 2; since is still just "some unknown constant," rename (a fresh arbitrary constant): Leaving it implicit is cleanest; solving for would force a (and the sign is pinned by the sign of at your starting point, since curves cannot cross ).

Exercise 2.2. Solve , and say where the solution through is valid.

Recall Solution 2.2

Separate: divide by (never zero, so no lost solutions): Integrate. Why on the left? Because — that integral is precisely the one whose answer is arctan. We place the single arbitrary constant on the right: Solve for (arctan is invertible everywhere): Where is this valid? blows up whenever its argument hits . So the solution exists only while For the initial condition : , giving . Since for all real , the argument never reaches , and this particular solution is defined on all of . (For a large , e.g. , the argument can exceed and the solution then only lives on the -intervals where .)

Exercise 2.3. Solve , and give the interval of validity for .

Recall Solution 2.3

Split the exponent: , so . Separate: divide by = multiply by : Integrate. Why does give exactly ? Because is the one function that is its own derivative: , so it is its own antiderivative. Likewise . Each integral would carry a constant, but — as always — we merge the two into a single arbitrary constant and park it on the right side only: So the two integration constants collapse into the one shown. Solve for : take logs of both sides: Explicit domain. A log is only defined for a positive argument, so we need , i.e. .

  • If : automatically, so the solution is defined for all .
  • If : we need . The solution lives only on , blowing down to as .
  • For : , giving . Since , this is valid on all of . (Indeed trivially checks: .)

Level 3 — Analysis

Goal: initial values, partial fractions, absolute-value care, and hunting lost solutions.

Exercise 3.1 (IVP). Solve with , then find where the solution is defined.

Recall Solution 3.1

Separate & integrate: , with the single arbitrary constant of integration. Exponentiate: , so with (a new nonzero arbitrary constant, defined as ). The is exactly what lets absorb the sign. Apply : , so : Domain: is finite and positive for all real , so the solution is defined on .

In the figure below the horizontal axis is and the vertical axis is ; the blue curve is the solution . The yellow dot marks the initial point where the curve passes through ; notice how flat the curve is for (it decays toward but never reaches it) and how the red arrow highlights the explosive, faster-than-exponential rise once (the exponent itself grows like a cube).

Figure — Separable ODEs — technique, implicit solutions

Exercise 3.2 (partial fractions). Solve with . Report equilibria too.

Recall Solution 3.2

Equilibria first (from 1.2): and . Separate: . Partial fractions. Why? So each piece integrates to a log. Write (Here are decomposition constants, not integration constants — they get pinned by algebra, not by initial data.) Clearing: . At : . At : . So . Integrate (one arbitrary constant on the right): Clear the by multiplying every term by : Now is still just "some unknown constant," so we rename it — a fresh arbitrary constant. Combining the two logs with : Solve for : exponentiate both sides, ; folding (yet another renamed arbitrary constant) drops the modulus: Cross-multiply and isolate : Apply : . Sanity check the limit: as , (approaches the upper equilibrium); as , .

In the figure below the horizontal axis is and the vertical axis is ; the green curve is our solution . The yellow dashed line at and the red dashed line at are the two equilibrium solutions: the green curve starts at the blue dot , is squeezed between those two flat lines, rises as an S-shape, and levels off just below — visually showing why and act as a "floor" and "ceiling" the solution can approach but never cross.

Figure — Separable ODEs — technique, implicit solutions

Exercise 3.3 (lost solution hunt). Solve and give all solutions.

Recall Solution 3.3

Equilibrium: is a solution (its slope is ). Record it. Generic curves: divide by : with the single arbitrary constant of integration. Exponentiate: (where , a new nonzero arbitrary constant): Note recovers , so we may allow any real and the single formula covers everything — but only because we consciously checked.


Level 4 — Synthesis

Goal: combine separation with algebra, substitution-flavoured setups, and interval-of-validity reasoning.

Exercise 4.1 (blow-up / interval of validity). Solve , . Where does the solution exist?

Recall Solution 4.1

Equilibrium: is a solution (won't fit , but record). Separate: , with the arbitrary constant of integration. Apply : . So . Interval of validity: the denominator at , where (finite-time blow-up!). The solution through lives only on — the largest interval containing that avoids the singularity. This is the classic lesson: a perfectly smooth-looking ODE can produce a solution that escapes to infinity in finite .

Exercise 4.2 (rewrite then separate). Solve ().

Recall Solution 4.2

Coax into separable form. Factor the RHS: . Divide by : Now and — separable! Equilibrium: . Separate & integrate (single arbitrary constant ): Solve for : exponentiate, , and since (so ), fold :

Exercise 4.3 (implicit, no isolation). Solve and verify implicitly. State on which side of a given solution lives.

Recall Solution 4.3

Watch the singularity you're about to divide by. The RHS is undefined when , i.e. . There the slope would be infinite (a vertical tangent), so a genuine solution curve can touch only at an isolated point with a vertical tangent, and can never cross it as a function of . Keep this in mind for the domain. Separate: . Integrate (single arbitrary constant ): . Why stop? Isolating needs the quadratic formula with a sign ambiguity — the implicit form is the honest general solution. Completing the square, , so Which sign / where valid? The initial condition picks the sign: if take "" (the whole branch stays above ); if take "" (stays below). The solution exists only where the radicand ; at the point where it hits the curve reaches with a vertical tangent and the function-solution stops. So the interval of validity is the -interval (containing ) on which . Verify by implicit differentiation:


Level 5 — Mastery

Goal: everything at once — equilibria, partial fractions with two distinct linear factors, sign/case analysis, and a full solution with an explicit domain.

Exercise 5.1 (all cases of a sign). Solve and describe every solution curve, covering all signs of .

Recall Solution 5.1

No equilibrium in the usual sense, but note makes the RHS undefined — solutions never cross the -axis. Separate: . Integrate (single arbitrary constant): . Multiply through by and rename (a fresh arbitrary constant): These are hyperbolas (or their degenerate limit). We must handle all three signs of and, within each, the sign of :

Case . Then , so is never zero. Solving, — two separate branches:

  • the upper branch lives entirely in ;
  • the lower branch lives entirely in . A solution stays on the branch matching the sign of (it can never jump across ). Both branches are defined for all (the radicand is always positive).

Case . Now needs , i.e. . The hyperbola opens left/right: two pieces, one on and one on , with a gap in between where no real exists. Again , and the sign of selects upper () vs lower (). Each solution is defined only on its own -interval (one of the two arms), and at the endpoint the curve reaches with a vertical tangent, so as a function of it stops there.

Case (degenerate). Then — the two straight asymptote lines. Because solutions cannot pass through the origin (RHS undefined at ), each is valid only on or , giving four half-line solutions: , , , . The sign of together with the sign of selects which half-line you are on.

Summary of "all signs of ": the sign of decides upper (+) vs lower (−) branch in every case; the value decides the shape (open up/down if , open left/right if , degenerate lines if ); and no solution ever crosses .

The three cases are drawn together below.

Figure — Separable ODEs — technique, implicit solutions

Exercise 5.2 (two distinct linear factors in partial fractions + IVP + explicit domain). Solve , , and give the explicit interval of validity.

Recall Solution 5.2

Equilibrium: (won't meet , but note it). Separate: . Partial fractions on the right. The denominator has two distinct linear factors, so we split into one term per factor: Integrate (single arbitrary constant ): Apply : LHS ; RHS . So . Thus . Solve for : Explicit interval of validity around . Three things must hold near the start point :

  1. Stay off the ODE's own singularities and (where ). Since , we require , ruling out everything at or left of .
  2. Keep the log's argument positive: for we have automatically, so no extra constraint here.
  3. Keep the denominator of nonzero: . Solving: . This root is negative, hence not in our region , so the denominator never vanishes for .

Combining, the largest interval containing on which all conditions hold is The point is the method: two-distinct-factor partial fractions untangled , then singularity-plus-denominator analysis pinned the explicit interval .


Recall checkpoints

Recall Fast triage: which of

, , , are separable? ✓ and ✓ are separable; the bare sums and are not (a between and , outside an exponent, blocks factoring).

Recall After solving, what two "existence" questions must you always ask?

(1) Did dividing by delete an equilibrium with ? (2) What is the interval of validity — where does a denominator vanish, a log go non-positive, or the solution blow up?

Recall What does the letter

(or , ) stand for on this page? An arbitrary constant of integration — an as-yet-unknown fixed number that appears because antiderivatives are only determined up to a constant. Reshaping it (multiplying, exponentiating) just renames it; there is always exactly one such constant for a first-order ODE, pinned by an initial condition.


Connections