4.3.9 · D4Calculus III — Sequences & Series

Exercises — Limit comparison test

2,156 words10 min readBack to topic

Parent: Limit comparison test · these are self-testing drills. Cover each solution, try it, then reveal.

This page is a ladder. Every rung asks slightly more of you than the last:

  • L1 Recognition — spot the right and read the fate off a known series.
  • L2 Application — run the full recipe cleanly.
  • L3 Analysis — cases where the naive choice traps you.
  • L4 Synthesis — combine LCT with other tools (p-Series, Geometric Series, Ratio Test).
  • L5 Mastery — build the parameter boundary yourself.

Everything you need is recalled below, so you can drill without flipping back. If you want the full derivation, see Limit comparison test.

Recall The Limit Comparison Test in one box

Let and for all large , and set .

  • Main case : and both converge or both diverge (same fate).
  • Edge : if converges, then converges. (Says nothing if diverges.)
  • Edge : if diverges, then diverges. (Says nothing if converges.)

The picture below is the mental image behind the main case: once the ratio enters a band around a positive , the two sequences are trapped within constant multiples of each other, so their partial sums rise together.

Figure — Limit comparison test

L1 — Recognition

Here you only pick (the skeleton: strongest power top, strongest power bottom) and state the fate. No limit needed yet.

Problem 1.1

For , what is the natural , and does converge?

Recall Solution

Skeleton. Strongest power on top is (behaves like ). Strongest on bottom is (behaves like ). So Why this ? For huge the and are dwarfed by the leading powers — only the biggest power in each slot decides the decay rate. Fate. is the Harmonic Series with , which diverges. Since tracks , the series diverges. ✔

Problem 1.2

For , pick and state the fate.

Recall Solution

Top , bottom , so is a p-Series with , which converges. So converges. ✔


L2 — Application

Now run the full recipe: pick , compute , confirm , read the fate.

The figure below shows the recipe as a decision flow — the same shape every problem in this level follows.

Figure — Limit comparison test

Problem 2.1

Determine convergence of .

Recall Solution

Pick. Top , bottom : . Compute . Divide top and bottom by : Conclude. , and diverges (harmonic). So diverges. ✔

Problem 2.2

Determine convergence of .

Recall Solution

Pick. Inside the root the strongest power is , so . The is a constant we can drop for the skeleton: Compute . Factor out of the root: , so Conclude. , and converges (). So converges. ✔

Problem 2.3

Determine convergence of .

Recall Solution

Pick. For large , crushes , so the denominator behaves like , giving a Geometric Series with ratio . Compute . because (exponential beats polynomial). Conclude. , and converges (). So converges. ✔


L3 — Analysis

Here the naive choice mis-fires. You must diagnose why and repair it — often by using the or edge rules.

Problem 3.1

Determine convergence of .

Recall Solution

Naive skeleton would say . But , so — that's the case against a convergent , which is inconclusive. We need a that is slightly bigger yet still convergent, so its extra power of can swallow the slow . Pick. (, still convergent). Compute . since any positive power of eventually beats . Conclude. and converges, so by the rule converges. ✔

Problem 3.2

Determine convergence of .

Recall Solution

Simplify the skeleton. Ignoring , the fraction behaves like , but there's a dividing, which helps convergence a little. To get a clean verdict, compare against and expect . because . But diverges — so paired with a divergent is inconclusive. This is the wrong yardstick. Repair. The in the denominator is weak; the term is barely smaller than . Compare against instead. A quick note on vs : these are asymptotically equal, since so and share the same fate. The latter's fate comes from the Integral Test: , so diverges. Conclude. against a divergent reference, so diverges. ✔


L4 — Synthesis

Combine LCT with a second tool, or choose between tools.

Problem 4.1

Test for convergence. Would LCT even help here?

Recall Solution

Diagnosis. Factorials have no "leading power" to strip, so there's no natural -series or geometric skeleton — LCT is a poor fit. This screams Ratio Test (ratios of consecutive terms kill factorials). Ratio Test. With , As this . Converges.Lesson: LCT is for algebraic (power/root/exponential-base) terms; factorials belong to the Ratio Test.

Problem 4.2

Test .

Recall Solution

Diagnosis. The whole thing is raised to the ; the base tends to . This looks geometric, so build (a Geometric Series, , converges). Compute . Write the base as . Now use the classical exponential limit : here the "" in the numerator plays the role of and the denominator grows like , so a finite positive number (the inner bracket , and the exponent ). Conclude. , and converges, so converges. ✔ (The Root Test also nails this instantly — LCT works because we could name the geometric skeleton.)


L5 — Mastery

Find the boundary yourself.

Problem 5.1

For which real does converge?

Recall Solution

Skeleton. Top , bottom , so Compute . for every , so shares the fate of . Boundary. This p-Series converges . Answer. converges for and diverges for . ✔

Problem 5.2

For which real does converge? (Use the right tool, then explain why LCT alone can't find the boundary.)

Recall Solution

Why LCT stalls. Every candidate gives (if , divergent ref, inconclusive) or (if , convergent ref, inconclusive) — the factor is sub-polynomial, so no power skeleton sits at the same rate. LCT can't resolve logarithmic borderlines. Right tool: Integral Test. With , substitute , : This is a -integral in : it converges . Answer. converges for , diverges for . ✔ Takeaway: LCT ranks series that decay like a power; logarithmic fine-structure needs the Integral Test.


Recall One-line self-check

When is LCT the wrong tool entirely? ::: When terms are factorials or -th powers (use Ratio Test/Root Test), or when the decay differs from a power only by a logarithm (use the Integral Test).