4.3.8 · D4Calculus III — Sequences & Series

Exercises — Direct comparison test

2,207 words10 min readBack to topic

Throughout we use the DCT exactly as stated in the parent: for terms with eventually,

Our two benchmark families — memorise them, they appear in almost every solution:

Figure — Direct comparison test

The picture above is the whole game: "convergence flows DOWN, divergence flows UP." Every solution below is just picking the right friend to compare with, and pointing the arrow the right way.


Level 1 — Recognition

Here you only decide which direction the comparison must point. No heavy algebra.

Recall Solution 1.1

Goal = convergence, so we must trap our series under a finite roof. That means must be bigger (an upper bound) and must converge. Concretely: , and is a -series with → converges. Answer: bigger and convergent.

Recall Solution 1.2

Goal = divergence, so we push up from an infinite floor: must be smaller (a lower bound) and divergent. Concretely is itself a -series with , so it diverges outright — but as a comparison, note , and the smaller harmonic diverges. Answer: smaller and divergent.

Recall Solution 1.3

Yes. is geometric with , , so it converges. The inequality provides a bigger convergent partner — the correct arrow for a convergence claim. Valid.


Level 2 — Application

Now build the actual inequality and conclude.

Recall Solution 2.1

Guess: dominant power → behaves like → converges. Since for all , we get . is a -series, → converges. Bigger convergent roof ⇒ converges.

Recall Solution 2.2

Guess: → diverges. We need a smaller divergent partner. Since for , we have . diverges (harmonic). Smaller divergent floor ⇒ diverges.Why ? We deliberately inflate the denominator to a clean multiple of so the term collapses to a harmonic-type lower bound.

Recall Solution 2.3

wiggles in , so ; in particular the term is . Bound the numerator by its maximum: . , → converges. Bigger convergent roof ⇒ converges.

Recall Solution 2.4

The denominator is dominated by , and , so . is geometric with , → converges. Bigger convergent roof ⇒ converges.


Level 3 — Analysis

Here the inequality needs shaping, or you must decide the direction of the algebra yourself.

Recall Solution 3.1

Guess: → converges. Need a bigger convergent partner. For , (since ). Therefore . converges (). ⇒ converges.Why the move? Directly points the wrong way for convergence, so we manufacture a valid upper bound by controlling how much dips below .

Recall Solution 3.2

Guess: → like → converges (). Since , , so . converges. Bigger convergent roof ⇒ converges.

Recall Solution 3.3

Guess: ratio → geometric-like, converges. Need a bigger convergent partner. For , . Actually simpler: for (since gives ). So . is geometric with → converges. Bigger convergent roof ⇒ converges.

Recall Solution 3.4

Key fact: for all (the log grows slower than the line). So for . diverges (harmonic). Smaller divergent floor ⇒ diverges.Why compare to ? We suspect divergence because is smaller than , so is larger than — we sit above a known-infinite floor.


Level 4 — Synthesis

Combine tools, or split a series into pieces.

Recall Solution 4.1

Both pieces are non-negative, so a valid single upper bound is a sum of upper bounds. Each piece converges: () and (geometric ). A sum of two convergent series converges. With DCT directly: for (since for ; check small separately — finitely many terms don't matter). converges. ⇒ converges.

Recall Solution 4.2

Since , the numerator for (equality only shrinks it). For , . So . diverges (harmonic). Smaller divergent floor ⇒ diverges.Insight: the dominant term is ; the is a bounded nuisance we absorb with a lower bound.

Recall Solution 4.3

Guess: top , bottom → like → converges. Upper bound: (since ) and . So Geometric → converges. Bigger convergent roof ⇒ converges.


Level 5 — Mastery

Subtle cases: sharp thresholds, near-misses, and knowing when DCT is the wrong tool.

Recall Solution 5.1

Try DCT: — but diverges, so a smaller-than-divergent comparison is useless. And for large — but converges, so a bigger-than-convergent comparison is also useless. DCT is squeezed out from both sides. Correct tool — Integral test: . The integral diverges, so the series diverges.Lesson: DCT needs a benchmark on the correct side; this series lives between the two benchmark families, so DCT can't reach it — you escalate to the integral test.

Recall Solution 5.2

Terms change sign, so DCT does not apply directly (it needs ). Instead compare absolute values: , and converges. By DCT the series of absolute values converges, hence the original is absolutely convergent (Absolute convergence), therefore convergent.Why the detour? DCT's proof rests on monotone partial sums, which requires non-negative terms — so we apply it to instead.

Recall Solution 5.3

Claim: converges iff (same threshold as the pure -series).

  • If : for , (since gives ), so . converges (). Bigger convergent roof ⇒ converges.
  • If : , so . diverges (). Smaller divergent floor ⇒ diverges. Both directions pinned by DCT. Answer: converges .
Recall Solution 5.4

For we have (the sine never overshoots its input on where it's non-negative; here , so ). Thus . converges. Bigger convergent roof ⇒ converges.Why ? It's the clean upper bound that converts a transcendental term into a -series comparison — the whole reason DCT is powerful.


Recall One-paragraph recap

Every problem reduced to one question: which trusted friend, on which side? Convergence ⇒ trap under a bigger convergent roof (numerator up, denominator down). Divergence ⇒ push above a smaller divergent floor (numerator down, denominator up). When the target squeezes between benchmarks (logs!) or changes sign, DCT alone can't do it — reach for the Integral test, Limit comparison test, or Absolute convergence.

Connections