4.3.7 · D4Calculus III — Sequences & Series

Exercises — Integral test — proof, p-series

2,305 words10 min readBack to topic

Tag: #calculus3 #series/convergence

This page is your self-test. Each problem is graded from L1 (Recognition) up to L5 (Mastery). Read the problem, try it before opening the solution, then check. Everything traces back to the parent note.


Level 1 — Recognition

Recall Solution 1.1

The rule: converges .

  • (a) , so converges.
  • (b) , so diverges.
  • (c) , so diverges (this is the Harmonic series, the exact boundary case).
Recall Solution 1.2

Check the three hypotheses restated at the top of the page.

  • (a) Positive ✓, continuous ✓, and so decreasing ✓ ⇒ legal.
  • (b) swings between and : not positive, not decreasing ⇒ illegal (areas would cancel).
  • (c) is negative for ⇒ not positive on illegal.

Level 2 — Application

Recall Solution 2.1

WHAT: set . WHY legal (all three hypotheses): positive ✓, continuous ✓; for so decreasing ✓. WHY ? The antiderivative of is — this is the one integral whose value is an angle, and as . The integral is finite () ⇒ the series converges.

Recall Solution 2.2

WHAT: , positive on ; for ⇒ decreasing ✓. WHY the substitution : the factor out front is exactly where — it lets the whole integrand collapse to . Finite () ⇒ the series converges.


Level 3 — Analysis

Recall Solution 3.1

WHERE it decreases: . This is when , i.e. . So increases up to , then decreases.

Figure — Integral test — proof, p-series

What to see in figure s02: the blue curve climbs from , reaches a single peak (the red dot) right at the yellow dashed line , then falls forever after. Left of the peak it rises (green label), so the integral-test rectangle comparison would go the wrong way there; right of the peak it falls (red label), where the test is legal.

WHY that's fine: the integral test only needs eventually decreasing — start from (the tail decides convergence; finitely many front terms can't change the fate). WHY : absorbs the , leaving the pure , which grows without bound. Integral diverges ⇒ the series diverges.

Recall Solution 3.2

WHAT: on . WHY positive: for , so both factors in the denominator are positive ✓. WHY continuous: it's a quotient of continuous functions with denominator never zero on ✓. WHY decreasing: write (the denominator); then since and . A growing positive denominator means is decreasing ✓. WHY : turns the integrand into a pure p-integral in . Now it is a p-integral in , whose convergence we already know:

  • : converges ⇒ series converges.
  • : diverges ⇒ series diverges. So the answer is the same razor cutoff as the p-series: convergence . (At we recover the parent's Example 3, which diverges.)

Level 4 — Synthesis

Recall Solution 4.1

WHY not integrate: has no clean antiderivative. Instead compare with a p-series whose fate we know from the integral test. For all : , so WHY this bound helps: is a p-series with , which the integral test proves converges. A smaller positive series under a convergent one also converges (Comparison test). ⇒ converges. (Cross-check with Limit comparison test: , a finite nonzero limit, so same fate.)

Recall Solution 4.2

Recall the trapping inequality with the -term partial sum: Here , , and (parent Example 1). Let so : So . WHY this is the point of the test: it bounds the sum without evaluating it. The true value is , which indeed lands in — never equal to either integral (that's the classic mistake). Tightening: bound the tail by , giving and .


Level 5 — Mastery

Recall Solution 5.1

The idea (same rectangle geometry as the top of the page, shifted to the tail). Over , decreasing gives

Figure — Integral test — proof, p-series

What to see in figure s03: the blue curve is on the tail . The red dashed rectangles use left-endpoint height and poke above the curve (their sum overshoots ⇒ upper bound); the green rectangles use right-endpoint height and sit under it (their sum undershoots ⇒ lower bound). The remainder is trapped between the two shaded areas.

Upper bound for : using the left inequality , sum : Lower bound for : using the right inequality , sum : Combine: .

Apply to , : , so (True remainder — inside the band.)

Recall Solution 5.2

Partial sum . From Problem 5.1, . So Midpoint estimate: , with maximum error . The true value is inside and within of our midpoint — far better than the crude of Problem 4.2. WHY it's better: we computed a few exact terms and only estimated the tail with integrals, where the rectangle error is small.


Active recall

Recall Quick self-check
  • Define the -term partial sum . ::: , the running total of the first terms.
  • State the trapping inequality. ::: .
  • for and its fate? ::: , diverges (constant irrelevant).
  • Antiderivative used for ? ::: ; integral , converges.
  • Where does start decreasing? ::: For ; test from .
  • Cutoff for ? ::: Converges .
  • Remainder bound for a convergent integral-test series? ::: .

Connections

  • Integral test — proof, p-series (index 4.3.7) — parent: the proof and p-rule these drill.
  • Comparison test — used in L4 to avoid a hard integral.
  • Limit comparison test — cross-check for Problem 4.1.
  • Improper integrals — the limit machinery in every L2+ solution.
  • Harmonic series — the boundary in L1.
  • Riemann zeta function, the true value we bounded.
  • n-th term test for divergence — the necessary condition behind the L1 trap.

Fate of ?
Diverges, .
Integral for ?
; converges.
Where does decrease?
; use in the integral test.
Convergence cutoff of ?
(via ).
Remainder bound for convergent integral test?
.
Bound on for ?
.
Definition of ?
The -term partial sum .