This page is your self-test. Each problem is graded from L1 (Recognition) up to L5 (Mastery). Read the problem, try it before opening the solution, then check. Everything traces back to the parent note.
WHAT: set f(x)=x2+11. WHY legal (all three hypotheses): positive ✓, continuous ✓; f′(x)=(x2+1)2−2x<0 for x≥1 so decreasing ✓.
∫1∞x2+1dx=limb→∞[arctanx]1b=limb→∞(arctanb−arctan1)=2π−4π=4π.WHY arctan? The antiderivative of x2+11 is arctanx — this is the one integral whose value is an angle, and arctanb→2π as b→∞. The integral is finite (π/4≈0.785) ⇒ the series converges.
Recall Solution 2.2
WHAT:f(x)=xe−x2, positive on [1,∞); f′(x)=e−x2(1−2x2)<0 for x≥1 ⇒ decreasing ✓.
WHY the substitution u=x2: the factor x out front is exactly21du where du=2xdx — it lets the whole integrand collapse to e−u.
∫1∞xe−x2dx=u=x221∫1∞e−udu=21[−e−u]1∞=21e−1=2e1.
Finite (≈0.184) ⇒ the series converges.
WHERE it decreases:f′(x)=x21−lnx. This is <0 when lnx>1, i.e. x>e≈2.718. So fincreases up to x=e, then decreases.
What to see in figure s02: the blue curve y=lnx/x climbs from x=1, reaches a single peak (the red dot) right at the yellow dashed line x=e, then falls forever after. Left of the peak it rises (green label), so the integral-test rectangle comparison would go the wrong way there; right of the peak it falls (red label), where the test is legal.
WHY that's fine: the integral test only needs feventually decreasing — start from N=3 (the tail decides convergence; finitely many front terms can't change the fate).
∫3∞xlnxdx=u=lnx∫ln3∞udu=limb→∞2u2ln3b=∞.WHY u=lnx:du=dx/x absorbs the x1, leaving the pure u, which grows without bound. Integral diverges ⇒ the series diverges.
Recall Solution 3.2
WHAT:f(x)=x(lnx)p1 on [2,∞). WHY positive: for x≥2, lnx>0 so both factors in the denominator are positive ✓. WHY continuous: it's a quotient of continuous functions with denominator never zero on [2,∞) ✓. WHY decreasing: write g(x)=x(lnx)p (the denominator); then
g′(x)=(lnx)p+x⋅p(lnx)p−1⋅x1=(lnx)p−1(lnx+p)>0for x≥2,
since lnx>0 and lnx+p>0. A growing positive denominator means f=1/g is decreasing ✓.
WHY u=lnx:du=dx/x turns the integrand into a pure p-integral in u.
∫2∞x(lnx)pdx=u=lnx∫ln2∞updu.
Now it is a p-integral in u, whose convergence we already know:
p>1: ∫u−pduconverges ⇒ series converges.
p≤1: diverges ⇒ series diverges.
So the answer is the same razor cutoff as the p-series: convergence ⟺p>1. (At p=1 we recover the parent's Example 3, which diverges.)
WHY not integrate:x3+11 has no clean antiderivative. Instead compare with a p-series whose fate we know from the integral test.
For all n≥1: n3+1>n3=n3/2, so
n3+11<n3/21.WHY this bound helps:∑n3/21 is a p-series with p=23>1, which the integral test proves converges. A smaller positive series under a convergent one also converges (Comparison test). ⇒ converges.
(Cross-check with Limit comparison test: lim1/n3/21/n3+1=1, a finite nonzero limit, so same fate.)
Recall Solution 4.2
Recall the trapping inequality with SN=∑n=1Nf(n) the N-term partial sum:
∫1N+1f≤SN≤f(1)+∫1Nf.
Here f(x)=x−2, f(1)=1, and ∫1∞x−2dx=1 (parent Example 1). Let N→∞ so SN→S:
=1∫1∞x2dx≤S≤=1f(1)+=1∫1∞x2dx.
So 1≤S≤2. WHY this is the point of the test: it bounds the sum without evaluating it. The true value is π2/6≈1.645, which indeed lands in [1,2] — never equal to either integral (that's the classic mistake). Tightening: bound the tail∑n=2∞ by ∫1∞x−2=1, giving S≤1+1=2 and S≥1+∫2∞x−2=1+21=1.5.
The idea (same rectangle geometry as the top of the page, shifted to the tail). Over [n,n+1], decreasing f gives
f(n+1)≤∫nn+1f≤f(n).
What to see in figure s03: the blue curve is y=1/x2 on the tail x≥3. The red dashed rectangles use left-endpoint height f(n) and poke above the curve (their sum overshoots ⇒ upper bound); the green rectangles use right-endpoint height f(n+1) and sit under it (their sum undershoots ⇒ lower bound). The remainder RN is trapped between the two shaded areas.
Upper bound for RN: using the left inequality f(n+1)≤∫nn+1f, sum n=N,N+1,…:
RN=∑n=N+1∞f(n)=∑k=N∞f(k+1)≤∑k=N∞∫kk+1f=∫N∞f.Lower bound for RN: using the right inequality ∫nn+1f≤f(n), sum n=N+1,N+2,…:
∫N+1∞f=∑n=N+1∞∫nn+1f≤∑n=N+1∞f(n)=RN.
Combine: ∫N+1∞f≤RN≤∫N∞f. ■
Apply to ∑1/n2, N=3:∫N∞x−2dx=N1, so
41≤R3≤31,i.e. 0.25≤R3≤0.333…
(True remainder R3=π2/6−1−41−91≈0.2838 — inside the band.)
Recall Solution 5.2
Partial sum S3=1+41+91=3649≈1.3611. From Problem 5.1, 41≤R3≤31. So
S3+41≤S≤S3+31,1.6111≤S≤1.6944.Midpoint estimate:S≈21.6111+1.6944=1.6528, with maximum error 21.6944−1.6111≈0.0417.
The true value π2/6≈1.6449 is inside [1.6111,1.6944] and within 0.008 of our midpoint — far better than the crude [1,2] of Problem 4.2. WHY it's better: we computed a few exact terms and only estimated the tail with integrals, where the rectangle error is small.