Worked examples — Area between curves — horizontal and vertical slices
Two symbols we lean on the whole page, restated in plain words:
- means "add up infinitely many thin standing-up rectangles from to "; the is the tiny width of each. (Built from scratch in Definite Integral as Riemann Sum.)
- means the same but with lying-down rectangles from to ; is the tiny height.
The scenario matrix
Every area-between-curves problem falls into one of these cells. Below the table, one example clears each cell.
| Cell | What makes it special | Example |
|---|---|---|
| A. Clean vertical | one top, one bottom, slice with | Ex 1 |
| B. Curves cross inside | signed pieces would cancel — must split | Ex 2 |
| C. Forced horizontal | curve is naturally ; vertical needs splitting | Ex 3 |
| D. Top curve changes | one curve plays two roles; split the integral | Ex 4 |
| E. Degenerate / zero area | curves tangent or identical — limits pinch shut | Ex 5 |
| F. Limiting behaviour | area as a parameter or | Ex 6 |
| G. Real-world word problem | area = a physical quantity with units | Ex 7 |
| H. Exam twist | region above and below an axis / sign trap | Ex 8 |
Ex 1 — Cell A: clean vertical slice
Forecast: guess before computing — is the answer bigger or smaller than ? (The region looks like a fat lens.)

- Find where they meet. Set . Why this step? The limits are exactly where the region pinches shut — the two curves touch there (see Solving Quadratic & Polynomial Equations).
- Decide top vs bottom. Test : parabola , line . So the parabola is on top across . Why this step? One interior test point fixes the order everywhere between the crossings — they only swap at the endpoints.
- Integrate top minus bottom. Why subtract? Each thin standing rectangle has height (top ) − (bottom ); that vertical gap is the parabola minus the line.
- Antiderivative (via Fundamental Theorem of Calculus):
Verify: the integrand is positive at (value ) and zero at both ends — no sign flip, so no cancellation worry. Answer , close to our guess of "around 5." ✔
Ex 2 — Cell B: the curves cross inside the interval
Forecast: if you naively do you'll get... something. Guess whether it's too small.

- Find the crossing inside the interval. . Why this step? If the curves swap top/bottom inside , one formula can't cover the whole thing — this is exactly Cell B.
- See who's on top in each piece. On : at , , so cosine is top. On : at , , so sine is top. Why this step? "Top" literally flips at the crossing; each region needs its own (top − bottom).
- Split and add, always top minus bottom. First piece: . Second piece: .
Verify: both pieces came out equal (), which matches the mirror symmetry of and about . Positive answer, as area must be. ✔
Ex 3 — Cell C: forced horizontal slicing
Forecast: would you rather solve for (getting ) or keep things as ?

- Intersect in terms of . . Why this step? Both curves are already written as , so the natural variable to sweep is — the crossings live at .
- Which curve is on the right? At : right-facing candidate , other is . So is the right curve, the left. Why this step? Horizontal rectangles have width (right ) − (left ); we need to know which is which.
- Integrate right minus left in .
- Evaluate (integrand is even, so double the part):
Why horizontal and not vertical? As a function of each parabola gives two -values (top and bottom halves). Vertical slicing would demand splitting and inverting; horizontal slicing dodges it entirely (this is where Inverse Functions would otherwise bite).
Verify: ; the region is roughly a -tall by up-to--wide lens, plausibly around . Symmetry (even integrand) confirmed the doubling. ✔
Ex 4 — Cell D: the top curve changes mid-sweep
Forecast: how many separate integrals do you think this needs?

- Find all three pairwise crossings.
- meets : (point ).
- meets : (point ).
- meets at the origin . Why this step? Corners of the region are where boundaries meet; the top boundary can only switch at such a corner.
- Spot the switch. The bottom is always . The top is from to , then it becomes from to . Why this step? Beyond the line has left the region — the ceiling handed off to the other line. That forces a split (Cell D).
- Two integrals, each top − bottom. First: . Second: .
Verify: the region's three corners are . Shoelace area of that triangle: . Matches. ✔
Ex 5 — Cell E: degenerate / zero area
Forecast: these look like a parabola and a line — surely they trap a normal region?
- Intersect. (double root). Why this step? A repeated root means the curves touch without crossing — the line is tangent to the parabola.
- Interpret. There is only one intersection point, so . The limits pinch to the same value. Why this step? A region needs two distinct crossings to have width; here there's none.
- Compute.
Verify: always, so with equality only at ; the "region" is a single point, area . ✔
Ex 6 — Cell F: limiting behaviour
Forecast: as shrinks to , the parabola flattens onto the axis — will the area vanish smoothly, or jump?
- Where does the parabola hit the axis? . Why this step? The region lives between these two roots; the limits depend on .
- Area (even integrand, double the half). Why this step? Both the height () and width () shrink, so the area scales like .
- Take the limit.
Verify: at , — matches the classic arch area. As the arch's area vanishes continuously (no jump), confirming the region collapses smoothly. ✔
Ex 7 — Cell G: real-world word problem (with units)
Forecast: the bed is a downward dip m deep and m wide — guess the area before integrating.

- Identify top and bottom. Top curve: surface . Bottom curve: bed . Why this step? Water fills between the flat surface on top and the curved bed below — a clean vertical-slice setup.
- Limits are the banks. Bed meets surface where (the water's edges). Why this step? Beyond the bed rises above — no water there.
- Integrate top − bottom.
Verify: . Units check: (metres) × (metres) integrated gives , correct for a cross-sectional area. A bounding box has area ; the parabolic dip fills of the box . ✔
Ex 8 — Cell H: exam twist (region above and below an axis)
Forecast: this region has a part below the -axis and a part above. Will a single integral get it right?

- Find all crossings in . . Why this step? Three crossings mean the top/bottom order can flip — this is really Cell B plus the exam trap of crossing the axis.
- Determine top on each piece.
- On : at , , . Since , is on top.
- On : at , , . Since , is on top. Why this step? The curves swap at ; each piece needs its own (top − bottom).
- Two integrals, always top − bottom. First: . Second: .
Verify: by the odd symmetry of the region about the origin, the two pieces must be equal — both gave . Total . ✔
Recall Scenario checklist (cover and recall)
Given any area problem, ask in order: (1) Do the curves cross inside? → split. (2) Is a curve naturally ? → slice . (3) Does the top/bottom hand off? → split. (4) Double root? → area zero. Otherwise it's the clean case.
Which cell has area exactly zero, and why?
Why does despite nonzero area?
When are you forced into slices?
Connections
- Definite Integral as Riemann Sum — every above is a limit of thin-rectangle sums.
- Fundamental Theorem of Calculus — evaluates each integral via antiderivatives.
- Inverse Functions — the tool avoided in Ex 3 by slicing horizontally.
- Solving Quadratic & Polynomial Equations — finds the intersection limits in Ex 1, 4, 5, 8.
- Volumes by Slicing & Disks — the same slice-measure-integrate pattern, one dimension up.
- Hinglish version.