4.2.13 · D3Calculus II — Integration

Worked examples — Area between curves — horizontal and vertical slices

2,499 words11 min readBack to topic

Two symbols we lean on the whole page, restated in plain words:

  • means "add up infinitely many thin standing-up rectangles from to "; the is the tiny width of each. (Built from scratch in Definite Integral as Riemann Sum.)
  • means the same but with lying-down rectangles from to ; is the tiny height.

The scenario matrix

Every area-between-curves problem falls into one of these cells. Below the table, one example clears each cell.

Cell What makes it special Example
A. Clean vertical one top, one bottom, slice with Ex 1
B. Curves cross inside signed pieces would cancel — must split Ex 2
C. Forced horizontal curve is naturally ; vertical needs splitting Ex 3
D. Top curve changes one curve plays two roles; split the integral Ex 4
E. Degenerate / zero area curves tangent or identical — limits pinch shut Ex 5
F. Limiting behaviour area as a parameter or Ex 6
G. Real-world word problem area = a physical quantity with units Ex 7
H. Exam twist region above and below an axis / sign trap Ex 8

Ex 1 — Cell A: clean vertical slice

Forecast: guess before computing — is the answer bigger or smaller than ? (The region looks like a fat lens.)

Figure — Area between curves — horizontal and vertical slices
  1. Find where they meet. Set . Why this step? The limits are exactly where the region pinches shut — the two curves touch there (see Solving Quadratic & Polynomial Equations).
  2. Decide top vs bottom. Test : parabola , line . So the parabola is on top across . Why this step? One interior test point fixes the order everywhere between the crossings — they only swap at the endpoints.
  3. Integrate top minus bottom. Why subtract? Each thin standing rectangle has height (top ) − (bottom ); that vertical gap is the parabola minus the line.
  4. Antiderivative (via Fundamental Theorem of Calculus):

Verify: the integrand is positive at (value ) and zero at both ends — no sign flip, so no cancellation worry. Answer , close to our guess of "around 5." ✔


Ex 2 — Cell B: the curves cross inside the interval

Forecast: if you naively do you'll get... something. Guess whether it's too small.

Figure — Area between curves — horizontal and vertical slices
  1. Find the crossing inside the interval. . Why this step? If the curves swap top/bottom inside , one formula can't cover the whole thing — this is exactly Cell B.
  2. See who's on top in each piece. On : at , , so cosine is top. On : at , , so sine is top. Why this step? "Top" literally flips at the crossing; each region needs its own (top − bottom).
  3. Split and add, always top minus bottom. First piece: . Second piece: .

Verify: both pieces came out equal (), which matches the mirror symmetry of and about . Positive answer, as area must be. ✔


Ex 3 — Cell C: forced horizontal slicing

Forecast: would you rather solve for (getting ) or keep things as ?

Figure — Area between curves — horizontal and vertical slices
  1. Intersect in terms of . . Why this step? Both curves are already written as , so the natural variable to sweep is — the crossings live at .
  2. Which curve is on the right? At : right-facing candidate , other is . So is the right curve, the left. Why this step? Horizontal rectangles have width (right ) − (left ); we need to know which is which.
  3. Integrate right minus left in .
  4. Evaluate (integrand is even, so double the part):

Why horizontal and not vertical? As a function of each parabola gives two -values (top and bottom halves). Vertical slicing would demand splitting and inverting; horizontal slicing dodges it entirely (this is where Inverse Functions would otherwise bite).

Verify: ; the region is roughly a -tall by up-to--wide lens, plausibly around . Symmetry (even integrand) confirmed the doubling. ✔


Ex 4 — Cell D: the top curve changes mid-sweep

Forecast: how many separate integrals do you think this needs?

Figure — Area between curves — horizontal and vertical slices
  1. Find all three pairwise crossings.
    • meets : (point ).
    • meets : (point ).
    • meets at the origin . Why this step? Corners of the region are where boundaries meet; the top boundary can only switch at such a corner.
  2. Spot the switch. The bottom is always . The top is from to , then it becomes from to . Why this step? Beyond the line has left the region — the ceiling handed off to the other line. That forces a split (Cell D).
  3. Two integrals, each top − bottom. First: . Second: .

Verify: the region's three corners are . Shoelace area of that triangle: . Matches. ✔


Ex 5 — Cell E: degenerate / zero area

Forecast: these look like a parabola and a line — surely they trap a normal region?

  1. Intersect. (double root). Why this step? A repeated root means the curves touch without crossing — the line is tangent to the parabola.
  2. Interpret. There is only one intersection point, so . The limits pinch to the same value. Why this step? A region needs two distinct crossings to have width; here there's none.
  3. Compute.

Verify: always, so with equality only at ; the "region" is a single point, area . ✔


Ex 6 — Cell F: limiting behaviour

Forecast: as shrinks to , the parabola flattens onto the axis — will the area vanish smoothly, or jump?

  1. Where does the parabola hit the axis? . Why this step? The region lives between these two roots; the limits depend on .
  2. Area (even integrand, double the half). Why this step? Both the height () and width () shrink, so the area scales like .
  3. Take the limit.

Verify: at , — matches the classic arch area. As the arch's area vanishes continuously (no jump), confirming the region collapses smoothly. ✔


Ex 7 — Cell G: real-world word problem (with units)

Forecast: the bed is a downward dip m deep and m wide — guess the area before integrating.

Figure — Area between curves — horizontal and vertical slices
  1. Identify top and bottom. Top curve: surface . Bottom curve: bed . Why this step? Water fills between the flat surface on top and the curved bed below — a clean vertical-slice setup.
  2. Limits are the banks. Bed meets surface where (the water's edges). Why this step? Beyond the bed rises above — no water there.
  3. Integrate top − bottom.

Verify: . Units check: (metres) × (metres) integrated gives , correct for a cross-sectional area. A bounding box has area ; the parabolic dip fills of the box . ✔


Ex 8 — Cell H: exam twist (region above and below an axis)

Forecast: this region has a part below the -axis and a part above. Will a single integral get it right?

Figure — Area between curves — horizontal and vertical slices
  1. Find all crossings in . . Why this step? Three crossings mean the top/bottom order can flip — this is really Cell B plus the exam trap of crossing the axis.
  2. Determine top on each piece.
    • On : at , , . Since , is on top.
    • On : at , , . Since , is on top. Why this step? The curves swap at ; each piece needs its own (top − bottom).
  3. Two integrals, always top − bottom. First: . Second: .

Verify: by the odd symmetry of the region about the origin, the two pieces must be equal — both gave . Total . ✔


Recall Scenario checklist (cover and recall)

Given any area problem, ask in order: (1) Do the curves cross inside? → split. (2) Is a curve naturally ? → slice . (3) Does the top/bottom hand off? → split. (4) Double root? → area zero. Otherwise it's the clean case.

Which cell has area exactly zero, and why?
Cell E — a repeated (double) root means the curves are tangent, so the limits pinch to one point.
Why does despite nonzero area?
The curves cross at ; the two humps carry opposite signs and cancel — you must split and use top−bottom.
When are you forced into slices?
When curves are given as (e.g. sideways parabolas), so each has two -values.

Connections

  • Definite Integral as Riemann Sum — every above is a limit of thin-rectangle sums.
  • Fundamental Theorem of Calculus — evaluates each integral via antiderivatives.
  • Inverse Functions — the tool avoided in Ex 3 by slicing horizontally.
  • Solving Quadratic & Polynomial Equations — finds the intersection limits in Ex 1, 4, 5, 8.
  • Volumes by Slicing & Disks — the same slice-measure-integrate pattern, one dimension up.
  • Hinglish version.