4.2.12 · D4Calculus II — Integration

Exercises — Convergence tests for improper integrals — comparison

2,830 words13 min readBack to topic

Level 1 — Recognition

The only skill here: look at the integrand , forecast the power of it behaves like for large , and name the benchmark . No full integration yet.


L1.1 For , which benchmark do you compare to, and do you bound above or below?

Recall Solution

Here . As the is dwarfed by , so behaves like . Take benchmark . Since , we get — that is, sits below . converges (), and we bound above by a convergent benchmark. Verdict: converges (left panel of the top figure).


L1.2 For , forecast the behaviour and name .

Recall Solution

Integrand . For large , numerator , denominator , so . Benchmark . diverges (). We expect our integral to diverge — to prove it we'll need to bound below by a multiple of (right panel of the top figure). (Full proof in L2.)


L1.3 For , name the dominant term and the benchmark.

Recall Solution

Integrand . Compare the two powers in the denominator: vs . The larger power dominates as , so denominator and . Benchmark , which converges (). Expect convergence.


Level 2 — Application

Now write the honest inequality (DCT) or the honest limit (LCT) and finish the argument.


L2.1 Prove converges using the Direct Comparison Test.

Recall Solution

Integrand , benchmark . On , ✅ (DCT requires nonnegativity). converges (). So the area-so-far is increasing (because ) and bounded above by the finite area of . By the Monotone Convergence Theorem (stated at the top), settles to a finite limit. Converges. ✅ (DCT is the strategy; Monotone Convergence is why it works.)


L2.2 Determine convergence of with the Limit Comparison Test.

Recall Solution

Integrand , benchmark (both ). Since , and share the same fate. diverges, so our integral diverges.(Cross-check: . Consistent.)


L2.3 Determine convergence of .

Recall Solution

Integrand , benchmark . (Why divide by ? To expose the leading term.) , same fate as , which converges (). Converges.


Level 3 — Analysis

Here you must choose the direction, handle wiggling / bounded factors, and defend each move.


L3.1 Determine convergence of .

Recall Solution

Integrand . wiggles but is caged: , so . Thus Bound above (proving convergence) by benchmark ; converges (). By DCT, converges.


L3.2 Determine convergence of .

Recall Solution

Powers of won't settle this — grows slower than every positive power, so DCT against is inconclusive. Integrate directly via substitution , : Diverges. ❌ (This is the integral-test cousin of the log series in Integral Test for series.)


L3.3 Determine convergence of .

Recall Solution

Integrand . Careful: , so is really small? Yes — grows slower than any power, so we can sacrifice a sliver of the to swallow the log. The key inequality for ALL (not just asymptotically): define . Then , and . So on and on : dips to a minimum at where . Since the global minimum on is positive, everywhere, i.e. . No hand-waving needed. Therefore Bound above by benchmark ; converges (). By DCT, converges.Why exactly ? (the direct check). Convergence is now proved, but we can pin the value by integration by parts with , so : Evaluate from to : at the lower limit () this is ; at the upper limit, as (both terms since beats ). So the integral . ✅ (checked in VERIFY.)


Level 4 — Synthesis

Combine tools, split integrals into pieces, mix type-1 (infinite limit) with type-2 (blow-up).


L4.1 Determine convergence of .

Recall Solution

Two dangers, so split at : near the term makes the integrand blow up (a type-2 improper point, see Improper integrals — infinite discontinuities (type 2)); near it's type-1. Piece near 0. First note that for we have , hence ; this is a lower bound on the integrand (). Why is a lower bound useless here? To prove convergence we need to cap the area from above (squeeze under something finite); a lower bound only says the area is at least something, which can never guarantee finiteness. So we discard it and reach for the upper bound instead: gives . Now converges ( converges when ; here — the type-2 -test flips!). So the near-0 piece converges. Piece near ∞: for , , so integrand ; converges. Both pieces finite whole integral converges.


L4.2 For which real does converge?

Recall Solution

Substitute , ; as , : This is exactly the p-integral in ! It converges . (For we recover L3.2, which diverges — consistent.)


Level 5 — Mastery

Edge cases, / subtleties, sign changes, and a full case analysis.


L5.1 Use LCT with to test . What does tell you, and is the one-way rule enough?

Recall Solution

Integrand , benchmark . is the degenerate LCT case: it gives only the one-way implication "if converges then converges." Here converges, and we still need for the DCT step to close. When is ? Exactly when , i.e. . On this holds for all (and is increasing, so it never dips back below ). Thus for , , and is a proper (finite) integral of a continuous function. So converges too.(Why one-way? means is eventually much smaller than . Small-under-convergent ⇒ convergent, but "small" tells us nothing if diverges.)


L5.2 (the edge case). Use LCT with to test . What does let you conclude?

Recall Solution

Integrand , benchmark . is the other degenerate case: it gives only the one-way implication "if diverges then diverges" (because is eventually much bigger than ). But here converges, so this rule is silent — it tells us nothing! Fix: switch to a bigger benchmark that still converges. Take . The bound. For , ... no — instead bound the log directly. Since is increasing and for , . From L3.3, for , and also once (true for all ). Hence for , Therefore Bound above by (left panel of the top figure); converges (). By DCT, converges.(Moral: against a convergent is useless; you must find a bigger benchmark that still converges — and , with still above , has exactly the room to absorb the slow log.)


L5.3 Test . Note changes sign — which theorem rescues DCT?

Recall Solution

DCT needs ; here oscillates in sign, so DCT does not apply directly. Use absolute comparison (see Absolute vs conditional convergence): converges converges (DCT on the nonnegative ). Absolute convergence convergence, so converges.


L5.4 (Full case analysis). For the parameter , classify as convergent or divergent for all . Cover , , .

Recall Solution

The denominator has two powers: and . The larger exponent dominates the tail — the red curve in the figure below tracks whichever benchmark wins.

Case : the term wins. LCT with : Same fate as , converges.

Case : denominator , integrand ; diverges.

Case : now the term wins. LCT with : Same fate as diverges.

Summary:

The figure below plots (red) hugging its winning benchmark for the convergent case — the geometric picture behind the LCT limit .

Figure — Convergence tests for improper integrals — comparison

Recall Master checklist (open after finishing)

Where is the trouble? ::: At (type 1) or at a finite blow-up point (type 2) — split the integral if both. Tail -rule vs finite-point -rule? ::: needs ; needs (flipped). Which benchmark power? ::: The fastest-growing term in the denominator controls the tail. changes sign? ::: Use (absolute comparison), not raw DCT. LCT gives ? ::: Only " converges converges" survives (L5.1). LCT gives ? ::: Only " diverges diverges" survives; against a convergent it is silent — change benchmark (L5.2). Direction of DCT inequality? ::: Squeeze to please (above a convergent), push to die (below a divergent) — the picture at the top.


Connections

  • The p-integral and p-series — the benchmark used in nearly every problem here.
  • Improper integrals — infinite discontinuities (type 2) — the flipped -rule in L4.1.
  • Absolute vs conditional convergence — rescues L5.3.
  • Monotone Convergence Theorem — the engine behind DCT.
  • Comparison test for infinite series · Integral Test for series — the discrete analogues (L3.2, L4.2).