Before you can read a single line of the main note, you must own every symbol it fires at you. This page builds each one from nothing — plain words, then a picture, then why the topic needs it. Each item leans on the one before, so read top to bottom.
Picture a horizontal number line (the x-axis) and a vertical one (the height). At each x the function tells you how tall the curve stands. The whole subject is about the region trapped between this curve and the x-axis — see the shaded blueprint below.
Why the topic needs it: the "area under a curve" is meaningless until you know a curve is just "height as a function of position". That shaded region is the prize we are chasing. See also Area under a curve.
Picture a row of fence-posts standing between a and b. Instead of inventing new letters for each, we reuse x and pin a numbered tag on it: post number 0, post number 1, up to post number n.
Why the topic needs it: we will plant many cutting points across [a,b] and must refer to each individually. Subscripts are the naming system.
Look at the figure: the fence from a to b is sliced by upright cutting lines into n vertical strips.
Why the topic needs it: one curvy region is hard; many thin strips are each almost a rectangle. The partition is the act of chopping. Linked idea: Continuity and Integrability.
Picture the horizontal distance between two neighbouring cutting lines — that base length is Δx. If the total fence is b−a wide and you cut it into n equal pieces, each piece is the total divided by n: that is nb−a.
Why the topic needs it: a rectangle's area is width × height. Δxis that width. Miss it and you're adding heights, not areas.
We have three natural spots — left edge, right edge, or middle of the strip. The figure shows all three heights for the same strip.
Why the topic needs it: a rectangle needs a single height, but the curve's height varies across a strip. The sample point is our decision of which single height to trust.
Why the topic needs it: we have n rectangles to total. Writing f(x1∗)Δx+f(x2∗)Δx+… is unbearable; ∑ says it in one breath. Handy closed forms live in Summation formulas.
Now the whole Riemann sum decodes:
Sn=∑i=1nheightf(xi∗)widthΔxi=total area of all n rectangles.
Why the topic needs it: this is the destination — every earlier symbol funnels into it. Once you see ∫ as "∑ taken to the limit", the notation stops being magic. The shortcut to evaluating it lives in the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus; refinements are the Trapezoidal Rule and Simpson's Rule.