Is page mein kuch bhi assume nahi kiya gaya. Agar koi symbol parent note par dikh raha hai aur aap 100% sure nahi hain uska matlab kya hai, toh woh yahan define kiya gaya hai, order mein, har ek ek picture se anchor karke.
Ek fact jo hum baar baar use karenge: curve ke sabse neeche wale point par tangent line flat hoti hai — uski slope zero hoti hai. Yeh "slope =0" poore subject ka seed hai.
YEH TOPIC KO KYU CHAHIYE: calculus of variations poori tarah ek analogy hai — "bottom par flat slope," lekin points ki jagah curves-of-curves ke liye. Agar slope zero at a minimum ka picture solid hai, toh baaki sab translation hai.
Picture: upar wali figure mein, valley floor par flat orange line ki slope 0 hai; kahin aur tilted line ki non-zero slope hai.
YEH TOPIC KO KYU CHAHIYE: "f′(x)=0 at a minimum" woh sentence hai jise poora subject upgrade karta hai. Hum ∂L/∂y aur d/dx symbols dekhenge — dono derivative ke types hain, isliye yeh parent page ke har symbol ka ancestor hai.
Recall Khud test karo
Kisi pahaad ki choti par slope positive, negative, ya zero hoti hai? ::: Zero — kisi bhi peak ya valley par flat tangent hoti hai.
Parent page dono∂y∂L aur dxd likhta hai. Yeh alag tools hain. Inhe mix mat karo.
YEH TOPIC KO KYU CHAHIYE: Euler–Lagrange equation literally partial minus total hai: ∂y∂L−dxd∂y′∂L. Agar aap dono mein fark nahi kar sakte, equation gibberish hai.
Picture: neeche wali figure mein shaded band woh running total hai jo integral collect karta hai.
YEH TOPIC KO KYU CHAHIYE: ek functional poori curve ke saath cost add karta hai — length, time, energy. Woh "curve ke saath add karna" exactly ek integral hai. Koi integral nahi, koi functional nahi.
Recall Khud test karo
∫abgdx geometrically kya compute karta hai? ::: x=a aur x=b ke beech g ke neeche signed area.
YEH TOPIC KO KYU CHAHIYE: hum un saari wires mein se choose kar rahe hain jo pins par start aur end hoti hain. Ends ko fix karna wahi hai jo baad mein ek irritating boundary term ko vanish karta hai (Section 6).
YEH TOPIC KO KYU CHAHIYE: yahi woh object hai jo hum minimise karte hain. Parent page par baaki sab kuch exist karta hai iss sawaal ka jawab dene ke liye — "kaun si curve yJ[y] ko sabse chhota banati hai?"
Yeh genuinely naya idea hai. Is picture ko master karo aur parent ki derivation inevitable ho jaati hai.
ENDPOINTS KYU MATTER KARTE HAIN AB: integration by parts (parent, Section 2) ek boundary term [Ly′η]ab bahar nikalta hai. Kyunki η(a)=η(b)=0, yeh term 0 hai aur drop ho jaati hai — yahi wajah hai ki humne fixed endpoints demand ki thi.
Recall Khud test karo
Bump η endpoints par kyun vanish hona chahiye? ::: Pinned endpoints ko fixed rakhne ke liye, jo integration by parts ke baad boundary term ko kill karta hai.
YEH TOPIC KO KYU CHAHIYE: yeh lemma hi parent ko "∫(…)ηdx=0 for all η" se actual Euler–Lagrange equation "(…)=0" tak jaane deta hai. Iske bina hum ek integral ke saath stuck rehte, equation nahi milti.