4.10.5 · D4Advanced Topics (Elite Level)

Exercises — Residues and poles

2,089 words9 min readBack to topic

Before you start, one figure fixes the whole mental model: a pole is a whirlpool inside a loop, and the residue is the strength of the swirl that survives one trip around.

Figure — Residues and poles

The single fact powering every solution (stated with its orientation convention, so signs never surprise you):

and the three ways to get a residue:

Here means "the number ", the coefficient of in the Laurent series — the one term that a loop integral does not cancel.


L1 — Recognition

Problem 1.1. For each function, name the singularity at (removable / pole of order / essential): (a) , (b) , (c) , (d) .

Recall Solution 1.1

What we do: look at the lowest power of that appears once we expand as a Laurent series — the number of negative powers is the whole story.

(a) no negative powers removable. (b) , so — lowest term ==pole of order ==. (c) infinitely many negative powers essential. (d) — lowest term ==pole of order ==.

Problem 1.2. Where are the poles of , and what order are they?

Recall Solution 1.2

What we do: factor the denominator. . Each factor appears to the first power, so and are each simple poles (order ). Numerator never vanishes there, so nothing cancels.


L2 — Application

Problem 2.1. Find .

Recall Solution 2.1

What we do: is a simple pole (single factor ). Use . Why this step: multiplying by deletes exactly the offending factor, leaving something finite to substitute.

Problem 2.2. Use the quotient shortcut on at .

Recall Solution 2.2

What we do: , , . Check: ✓, ✓, ✓. Why this tool: near a simple root , so — the shortcut just skips the algebra of factoring .

Problem 2.3. Find .

Recall Solution 2.3

What we do: order- pole, so use the derivative formula with : Cross-check: from 1.1(b), was the coefficient directly. ✓


L3 — Analysis (choose the right tool)

Problem 3.1. Find every residue of .

Recall Solution 3.1

What we do: two singularities — (order ) and (simple). Different tools each.

At (simple):

At (order , ): Sanity check (with the precise condition): define the residue at infinity as the residue of at . A general theorem says the sum of all residues — every finite pole plus the point at infinity — is exactly for any function analytic except at finitely many isolated points. When is rational and decays faster than as (here , so numerator degree is at least below denominator degree), the residue at infinity is itself , and the theorem collapses to: the finite residues sum to . Check: ✓. (If only decays like , the residue at infinity is generally nonzero and this shortcut does not apply.)

Problem 3.2. Determine the order of the pole of at , then find its residue.

Recall Solution 3.2

What we do: first the order. Near , . Squaring: . The prefactor means an ==order- pole==.

Residue (): let . First we derive the series of rather than quote it. Write and use . The defining identity is , i.e. Match powers of :

  • : ✓.
  • : .
  • : .

So derived, not assumed. Squaring (we only need up to ): So coefficient of . Hence Why series, not brute derivative: differentiating directly is a nightmare at ; expanding (analytic, value at ) makes the limit painless.


L4 — Synthesis (combine ideas)

Problem 4.1. Evaluate (contour counter-clockwise).

Recall Solution 4.1

What we do: find poles, test which lie inside , sum their residues, multiply by . Poles at and ; both satisfy , so both are enclosed (each with winding number ).

Problem 4.2. Same integrand as 4.1 but over (counter-clockwise). Evaluate.

Recall Solution 4.2

What we do: re-test enclosure. Now contains ( ✓) but not ( ✗). Only counts: . Punchline: the same function gives a different integral because a different set of whirlpools sits inside the loop — the contour, not the function alone, decides.


L5 — Mastery (real integrals + subtlety)

Problem 5.1. Compute by residues.

Recall Solution 5.1

What we do: view the real integral as the real-axis piece of a closed contour: the segment along the real axis, plus a big semicircle of radius arching back through the upper half plane. The figure below shows this exact contour — study it before reading on.

On that semicircle while its length , so the arc integral as . What remains is: (real-line integral) (residues inside the upper half plane). Poles of : ; only is upper. Quotient shortcut (, ): Check: the elementary antiderivative gives ✓.

The contour used above — real segment (orange) closed by the upper arc (magenta), enclosing the single pole (violet) while sits outside:

Figure — Residues and poles

Notice in the figure how the orange real segment carries the integral we actually want, the magenta arc contributes nothing in the limit, and only the violet enclosed pole feeds the residue sum. That picture is the template for every problem in this level.

Problem 5.2. Compute .

Recall Solution 5.2

What we do: same upper-semicircle setup (same figure as 5.1, just a different pole). Here degree of denominator () exceeds numerator () by , so the arc still vanishes. The only upper pole is , and it is an order- pole (because ). Set . For : Quotient rule: At : , , numerator . So . Why the order matters: treating as simple (multiply by one factor of ) would leave a residual in the denominator and blow up — the tell-tale sign you under-counted the order.

Problem 5.3. Read off directly from the Laurent series.

Recall Solution 5.3

What we do: essential singularity — no order- formula applies, so we expand and pick . The term needs exponent , giving coefficient . Why series only: for an essential singularity never becomes analytic for any finite , so the limit/derivative machinery has nothing to latch onto — the Laurent coefficient is the answer.


Score Yourself

Recall Level checklist
  • L1 done if you classify singularities from the Laurent series without computing anything.
  • L2 done if you pick simple / quotient / order- correctly and remember .
  • L3 done if you find the true pole order (watch squared denominators) before choosing a tool.
  • L4 done if you keep only enclosed poles for each contour.
  • L5 done if you justify the vanishing arc and handle essential singularities by series.

Connections

  • Residues and poles — parent; all formulas live there.
  • Contour integration — the L5 real-integral machinery.
  • Cauchy's Integral Theorem — why poles outside contribute zero (L4).
  • Cauchy's Integral Formula — the order- derivative formula is this in disguise.
  • Argument principle / Rouché's theorem — next step: residues that count zeros/poles.

Residue of at ?
.
Residue of at ?
.
Residues of ?
at , at .
?
.
?
(only enclosed).
?
.
?
.
Residue of at ?
.