Goal: read structure straight off a series. No heavy computation.
Recall Solution L1.1
(a) The principal part is the sum of negative-power terms only:
z23−z5.(b) The most negative power is z−2 and its coefficient 3=0, so the principal part stops at (z−0)−2 → pole of order 2.
(c) Residue =c−1= coefficient of z1=−5.
Recall Solution L1.2
(i) Infinitely many negative powers → essential singularity.
(ii) No negative powers at all → principal part is zero → removable singularity (the function is secretly analytic there).
Goal: divide known Taylor series to build a Laurent series.
Recall Solution L2.1
Start from the Taylor series we already trust (Taylor series):
sinz=z−3!z3+5!z5−⋯Why this step? The numerator is analytic — dividing by z3 just shifts every power down by 3, which is exactly how the negative powers appear.
z3sinz=z21−3!1+5!z2−⋯
Principal part: z21 (the z−1 term is absent — its coefficient is 0).
Most negative power is z−2 with coefficient 1=0 → pole of order 2.
Residue =c−1=0.
Valid in 0<∣z∣<∞.
Recall Solution L2.2
ez=1+z+2z2+6z3+⋯zez=z1+1+2z+6z2+⋯
First four terms: z1+1+2z+6z2.
Residue =c−1=1. Pole of order 1 (a simple pole).
Goal: pick the correct annulus and expand the geometric series the right way round.
Recall Solution L3.1
(a) ∣z∣<3 — here ∣z∣ is small, so factor out the bigger quantity, which is 3:
z−31=3−1⋅1−z/31=−31∑n=0∞3nzn=−∑n=0∞3n+1zn.
Valid because ∣z/3∣<1. No principal part (singularity at 3 sits outside this disk), so this is a plain Taylor series. Residue at 0 is 0 (no z−1).
(b) ∣z∣>3 — now ∣z∣ is big, so factor out z (the bigger quantity):
z−31=z1⋅1−3/z1=z1∑n=0∞zn3n=∑n=0∞zn+13n.
Valid because ∣3/z∣<1. All negative powers. Residue =c−1=30=1.
(See the "large z" arrow in the figure above — big ∣z∣ always pushes you toward 1/z.)
In the ring 1<∣z∣<3: the singularity at 1 is inside, the one at 3 is outside.
z−11: since ∣z∣>1, factor out z → negative powers:
z−11=z1∑n≥0zn1=∑n≥0zn+11.
z−31: since ∣z∣<3, factor out 3 → positive powers:
z−31=−∑n≥03n+1zn.
Combine with the ±21:
f(z)=−21∑n≥0zn+11−21∑n≥03n+1zn.
Residue at 0 = coefficient of z−1 = −21 (from n=0 of the first sum) =−21.
Goal: assemble multi-piece expansions and classify across regions.
Recall Solution L4.1
Both singularities are now inside, so both pieces go into 1/z.
z−11=∑n≥0zn+11,z−31=z1∑n≥0zn3n=∑n≥0zn+13n.
With coefficients −21 and +21:
f(z)=21∑n≥0zn+13n−1.
All negative powers. Residue at 0 = coefficient of z−1 = 21(30−1)=21(1−1)=0.
Sanity note:f has no singularity at 0, so the "residue at 0" being 0 is consistent — the outer-region expansion still lists a z−1 term, but its coefficient collapses to 0.
Recall Solution L4.2
Use e1/z=∑n≥0n!zn1=1+z1+2!z21+3!z31+⋯
Multiply every term by z2 (shifts powers up by 2):
z2e1/z=z2+z+2!1+3!z1+4!z21+⋯
There are still infinitely many negative powers → essential singularity (multiplying by z2 cannot kill an infinite tail).
Residue =c−1=3!1=61.
Goal: reverse-engineer, combine tools, and connect to the residue theorem.
Recall Solution L5.1
In ∣z∣<1 expand z−11=−1−z1=−∑n≥0zn=−(1+z+z2+⋯).
Then
z2(z−1)1=z21(−(1+z+z2+⋯))=−z21−z1−1−z−⋯
Most negative power z−2, coefficient −1=0 → pole of order 2.
Residue =c−1=−1.
By the Residue theorem, with the loop ∣z∣=21 enclosing only the singularity at 0 (the one at 1 is outside):
∮∣z∣=1/2fdz=2πi(c−1)=2πi(−1)=−2πi.
This is exactly why residues run contour integration: only the z−1 term survives the loop integral (the "k=−1 gives 2πi" fact from the parent).
Recall Solution L5.2
The residue theorem says a closed loop integral =2πi× (sum of residues enclosed).
∣z∣=3 encloses z=2 (since ∣2∣=2<3). Only that pole contributes:
∮∣z∣=3gdz=2πi(4)=8πi.
∣z∣=1.5 does not enclose z=2 (since 2>1.5), and g is analytic everywhere else inside:
∮∣z∣=1.5gdz=2πi(0)=0.Why we can answer without knowing g: the loop integral cares only about singularities inside it (a consequence of the pole structure plus the k=−1 survival fact).
Recall Solution L5.3
The principal part contains −z21, whose exponent −2 has a non-zero coefficient. So the pole order is 2, not 1 — the claim is inconsistent. The correct classification is pole of order 2. The residue is the coefficient of z−1, which is 2.
Which term of a Laurent series decides the pole order? ::: The most negative power with a non-zero coefficient.
Which term decides the residue? ::: The coefficient c−1 of (z−a)−1.
In ∣z∣>3, do you expand z−31 in powers of z or of 1/z? ::: In powers of 1/z (factor out z, since ∣3/z∣<1).
Does multiplying by z2 turn an essential singularity into a pole? ::: No — an infinite negative tail survives any finite power shift.
∮∣z∣=1/2z2(z−1)dz? ::: −2πi (residue at 0 is −1).