4.10.4 · D4Advanced Topics (Elite Level)

Exercises — Laurent series — principal part, annulus of convergence

1,969 words9 min readBack to topic

Before we start, one tiny toolkit we reuse everywhere.

The picture below shows which direction to expand in each annular ring for a function with singularities at and . We refer back to it in L3–L5.

Figure — Laurent series — principal part, annulus of convergence

Level 1 — Recognition

Goal: read structure straight off a series. No heavy computation.

Recall Solution L1.1

(a) The principal part is the sum of negative-power terms only: (b) The most negative power is and its coefficient , so the principal part stops at pole of order 2. (c) Residue coefficient of .

Recall Solution L1.2

(i) Infinitely many negative powers → essential singularity. (ii) No negative powers at all → principal part is zero → removable singularity (the function is secretly analytic there).


Level 2 — Application

Goal: divide known Taylor series to build a Laurent series.

Recall Solution L2.1

Start from the Taylor series we already trust (Taylor series): Why this step? The numerator is analytic — dividing by just shifts every power down by , which is exactly how the negative powers appear.

  • Principal part: (the term is absent — its coefficient is ).
  • Most negative power is with coefficient pole of order 2.
  • Residue . Valid in .
Recall Solution L2.2

First four terms: . Residue . Pole of order 1 (a simple pole).


Level 3 — Analysis

Goal: pick the correct annulus and expand the geometric series the right way round.

Recall Solution L3.1

(a) — here is small, so factor out the bigger quantity, which is : Valid because . No principal part (singularity at sits outside this disk), so this is a plain Taylor series. Residue at is (no ).

(b) — now is big, so factor out (the bigger quantity): Valid because . All negative powers. Residue . (See the "large " arrow in the figure above — big always pushes you toward .)

Recall Solution L3.2

Partial fractions: . Check: . ✔

In the ring : the singularity at is inside, the one at is outside.

  • : since , factor out → negative powers:
  • : since , factor out → positive powers: Combine with the : Residue at = coefficient of = (from of the first sum) .

Level 4 — Synthesis

Goal: assemble multi-piece expansions and classify across regions.

Recall Solution L4.1

Both singularities are now inside, so both pieces go into . With coefficients and : All negative powers. Residue at = coefficient of = . Sanity note: has no singularity at , so the "residue at " being is consistent — the outer-region expansion still lists a term, but its coefficient collapses to .

Recall Solution L4.2

Use Multiply every term by (shifts powers up by 2): There are still infinitely many negative powers → essential singularity (multiplying by cannot kill an infinite tail). Residue .


Level 5 — Mastery

Goal: reverse-engineer, combine tools, and connect to the residue theorem.

Recall Solution L5.1

In expand . Then

  • Most negative power , coefficient pole of order 2.
  • Residue .
  • By the Residue theorem, with the loop enclosing only the singularity at (the one at is outside): This is exactly why residues run contour integration: only the term survives the loop integral (the " gives " fact from the parent).
Recall Solution L5.2

The residue theorem says a closed loop integral (sum of residues enclosed).

  • encloses (since ). Only that pole contributes:
  • does not enclose (since ), and is analytic everywhere else inside: Why we can answer without knowing : the loop integral cares only about singularities inside it (a consequence of the pole structure plus the survival fact).
Recall Solution L5.3

The principal part contains , whose exponent has a non-zero coefficient. So the pole order is , not — the claim is inconsistent. The correct classification is pole of order 2. The residue is the coefficient of , which is .


Active recall

Recall One-line self-check

Which term of a Laurent series decides the pole order? ::: The most negative power with a non-zero coefficient. Which term decides the residue? ::: The coefficient of . In , do you expand in powers of or of ? ::: In powers of (factor out , since ). Does multiplying by turn an essential singularity into a pole? ::: No — an infinite negative tail survives any finite power shift. ? ::: (residue at is ).