Before we begin, one picture fixes the entire mental model for the whole page.
Here 2πi is just the number 2π≈6.283 multiplied by i=−1; it always appears
because a full trip counterclockwise around a circle sweeps an angle of 2π radians.
Goal: spot which of the three outcomes applies. No heavy computation.
Recall Solution 1.1
WHAT is the integrand? A polynomial. WHY does that settle it? A polynomial is
holomorphic (complex-differentiable) at every point of the plane — it never divides by
anything, so it has no bad points anywhere, in particular none inside ∣z∣=1, and none on
the circle either. The enclosed disk is simply connected. That is exactly Outcome 1.
∮∣z∣=1(3z4−5z+7)dz=0.
Recall Solution 1.2
WHAT is the bad point? The denominator z is zero at z=0, and 0 is the centre of the
circle — definitely inside (not on the path). So this is not Outcome 1.
WHY Outcome 2? Match the pattern z−af(z) with a=0 and f(z)=1 (the constant
function, holomorphic). Cauchy's Integral Formula gives
∮∣z∣=1z1dz=2πif(0)=2πi⋅1=2πi.
The point of this classic: a single hole makes the answer nonzero.
Recall Solution 1.3
WHAT is the bad point?z=3. WHERE is it? Its distance from the origin is 3, but the
loop only reaches distance 1. So the bad point is outside the loop (and not on it).
WHY that means zero: inside and on ∣z∣=1 the integrand z−31 is perfectly
holomorphic (nothing blows up there), and the enclosed disk is simply connected. Outcome 1.
∮∣z∣=1z−31dz=0.
Goal: plug into the right formula and evaluate f(a).
Recall Solution 2.1
Bad point:z=1, distance 1 from origin, which is <2 → inside∣z∣=2 (not on it).
Outcome 2.
Match the pattern:z−af(z) with a=1, f(z)=ez (holomorphic everywhere).
∮∣z∣=2z−1ezdz=2πif(1)=2πie1=2πie.
Numerically 2πe≈17.08, so the value is about 17.08i.
Recall Solution 2.2
Bad point:z=0, inside. Pattern:a=0, f(z)=sinz.
∮∣z∣=1zsinzdz=2πisin(0)=2πi⋅0=0.WHY zero even with a hole? The formula returns 2πif(a); here f(0)=sin0=0.
The hole is real, but the numerator vanishes there, so the answer collapses to 0.
(Geometrically: sinz/z actually has a removable singularity — it can be redefined as
1 at 0 and becomes fully holomorphic.)
Recall Solution 2.3
Bad point:z=2i. Its distance from origin is ∣2i∣=2<3 → inside (not on the path).
Outcome 2. Pattern:a=2i, f(z)=z2+1.
f(2i)=(2i)2+1=4i2+1=−4+1=−3.∮∣z∣=3z−2iz2+1dz=2πi(−3)=−6πi.
Goal: higher-order poles (repeated bad points) and choosing n correctly.
Recall Solution 3.1
Read the power: denominator is z3=(z−0)3. Match (z−a)n+1: so n+1=3⇒n=2, a=0, f(z)=cosz.
Differentiate twice:f′(z)=−sinz, f′′(z)=−cosz, so f′′(0)=−cos0=−1.
∮=2!2πif′′(0)=22πi(−1)=−πi.
Recall Solution 3.2
Read the power:z2=(z−0)2⇒n+1=2⇒n=1, a=0, f(z)=e2z.
Differentiate once:f′(z)=2e2z, so f′(0)=2e0=2.
∮=1!2πif′(0)=2πi⋅2=4πi.
Recall Solution 3.3
Bad pointz=1, distance 1<2 → inside. Power:(z−1)2⇒n+1=2⇒n=1, a=1, f(z)=z.
Differentiate once:f′(z)=1, so f′(1)=1.
∮=1!2πif′(1)=2πi⋅1=2πi.
Goal: two or more poles inside one loop — split the work.
Recall Solution 4.1
Where are the poles?z=1 and z=2; distances 1 and 2, both <3 → both inside
(neither on the path). Split (partial fractions): we want
(z−1)(z−2)1=z−1A+z−2B. Clearing denominators,
1=A(z−2)+B(z−1). Set z=1 (kills the B term): 1=A(−1)⇒A=−1.
Set z=2 (kills the A term): 1=B(1)⇒B=1. So the integrand is
z−1−1+z−21.
Apply the formula to each (each is z−aconst, i.e. f= that constant):
∮z−1−1=2πi(−1)=−2πi,∮z−21=2πi(1)=2πi.Add:−2πi+2πi=0.Sanity comment: the two residues cancelled — a genuine feature, not a mistake.
Recall Solution 4.2
Recheck which poles are inside: the loop has radius 23=1.5. Pole z=1: distance
1<1.5 → inside. Pole z=2: distance 2>1.5 → outside. (Neither lies on the path.)
Only the inside pole contributes. Using the same split z−1−1+z−21:
the z−21 term is holomorphic inside this smaller loop, so its integral is 0
(Cauchy's Theorem). Only the z−1−1 term survives:
∮∣z∣=3/2=2πi(−1)+0=−2πi.Lesson: changing the radius changes the answer, because it changes which poles are enclosed.
Recall Solution 4.3
Poles:z=0 and z=1, distances 0 and 1, both <2 → both inside.
Split the z(z−1)1 part (same root-plugging trick): z(z−1)1=zA+z−1B gives
1=A(z−1)+Bz. Set z=0 (kills B): A=−1; set z=1 (kills A): B=1. So
z(z−1)ez=ez(z−1+z−11)=z−ez+z−1ez.Apply formula (now f(z)=ez on each):∮z−ez=2πi(−e0)=−2πi,∮z−1ez=2πie1=2πie.Add:−2πi+2πie=2πi(e−1).
Goal: combine Cauchy machinery with a downstream consequence (bounds, uniqueness, real integrals).
Recall Solution 5.1
First, the modulus of the prefactor. We need 2πi1. Recall
∣i∣=1 (the number i sits on the unit circle, distance 1 from origin), and the modulus of
a quotient is the quotient of moduli, so 2πi1=2π∣i∣1=2π1.
The i contributes nothing to the size — it only rotates.
Tool — the ML inequality: for any contour, ∮gdz≤(length)⋅(max∣g∣).
WHY this tool? We cannot compute the integral exactly (unknown f), but we can bound it.
On ∣z∣=R with a=0: length =2πR, and
z2f(z)=∣z∣2∣f(z)∣≤R2M.
So
∣f′(0)∣=2π1∮z2f(z)dz≤2π1⋅2πR⋅R2M=RM.Payoff: this is exactly the estimate behind Liouville's theorem — a bounded entire
function (M fixed while R→∞) has f′(0)=0, hence is constant.
Recall Solution 5.2
Set up the parametrisation: on ∣z∣=1 traced counterclockwise, z=eiθ with
θincreasing from 0 to 2π; then dz=ieiθdθ and
z−a=eiθ−0=eiθ. With f≡1,
∮∣z∣=1z1dz=∫02πeiθ1ieiθdθ=i∫02πdθ.But we also know this integral equals 2πif(0)=2πi (Exercise 1.2). Equate:
i∫02πdθ=2πi⇒∫02πdθ=2π.Meaning: the mysterious 2πi in Cauchy's formula is literally the trip's angle
2π, dressed with an i from dz. (Had we run θ the other way, 2π→0, we would
have gotten −2πi — this is why direction is fixed.)
Recall Solution 5.3
Start from the formula on the circle ∣z−a∣=r: parametrise z=a+reiθ with
θ increasing 0→2π (counterclockwise), so z−a=reiθ and
dz=ireiθdθ.
f(a)=2πi1∮z−af(z)dz=2πi1∫02πreiθf(a+reiθ)ireiθdθ.Cancelreiθ and the i against 2πi1:
f(a)=2π1∫02πf(a+reiθ)dθ.Meaning: the value at the centre equals the average of the values around any circle.
This is the seed of the Maximum modulus principle — an interior point can never exceed the
boundary, because it is an average of boundary values.
Recall One-line summary of the whole page
Locate every bad point ::: check which are inside the (counterclockwise) loop and that none lies on it; no poles → 0; simple pole → 2πif(a); order-(n+1) pole → n!2πif(n)(a); several poles → split (one term per power for repeated factors) and add.