4.1.30 · D3 · HinglishCalculus I — Limits & Derivatives

Worked examplesCurve sketching — systematic approach

3,458 words16 min read↑ Read in English

4.1.30 · D3 · Maths › Calculus I — Limits & Derivatives › Curve sketching — systematic approach

Ye page parent ke tools assume karta hai: First derivative and monotonicity, Second derivative test, Rational functions and asymptotes, Limits and continuity, aur Optimization. Jahan use hote hain, wahan link diya hai.


Scenario matrix

Har curve-sketching problem inme se kuch case classes ka combination hoti hai. Har row ek alag behaviour hai jo tumhe handle karna aana chahiye; har ek ko neeche kam se kam ek worked example se cover kiya gaya hai.

# Case class Ismein kya khaas hai Covered by
A Polynomial, do turning points ka sign do baar badalti hai; ends ki taraf jaate hain Ex 1
B Degenerate critical point (flat inflection) lekin koi extremum nahi Ex 2
C Rational, horizontal asymptote denominator degree numerator degree Ex 3
D Rational, vertical asymptotes dono signs ke saath ek taraf, doosri taraf Ex 3
E Rational, oblique/slant asymptote numerator degree denominator degree Ex 4
F Even vs odd symmetry reflection se kaam adha ho jaata hai Ex 1 (odd), Ex 3 (even)
G Apni horizontal asymptote ko cross karta hai asymptote sirf infinity par govern karta hai, har jagah nahi Ex 5
H Zero / degenerate input (limit form ) removable hole vs genuine blow-up Ex 6
I Real-world word problem (optimization flavour) curve shape ek physical question ka jawab deta hai Ex 7
J Exam twist — function mein parameter behaviour ek constant ke sign par depend karta hai Ex 8

Ab hum har example ko walk karenge, cells ke labels ke saath.


Example 1 — Polynomial, do turning points, odd symmetry · cells A, F

Step 1 — Domain & symmetry. ek polynomial hai, isliye yeh sabhi real ke liye defined hai. Symmetry check karo: Toh odd hai — origin ke baare mein symmetric hai. Ye step kyun? Odd symmetry ka matlab hai ek baar right half pata chal gayi, toh left half uski rotation hai — First derivative and monotonicity ka kaam adha ho jaata hai.

Step 2 — Intercepts. ; aur se milta hai . Ye step kyun? Zeros anchor karte hain ki S-curve axis ko kahan cross karti hai.

Step 3 — First derivative. set karo: . ka sign: ke bahar toh (rising); andar, (falling). Toh par change → local max; par local min. Heights: , aur oddness se . Ye step kyun? ka sign monotonicity engine hai; uske zeros turning candidates hain.

Step 4 — Second derivative. ke liye (concave down, frown), ke liye (concave up, smile), par switch → inflection at . Ye step kyun? Second derivative test max/min confirm karta hai ( ✓ max, ✓ min) aur bend switch locate karta hai.

Neeche ka figure — kya observe karna hai. Burnt-orange S-curve lower left se upar climb karti hai, teal peak at par pahunchti hai, ink inflection square at the origin se girte hue jahan woh briefly seedhi ho jaati hai, plum valley par neeche aati hai, phir dobara climb karti hai. Dekho ki picture origin ke baare mein rotation hai — yahi oddness visible hoti hai.

Figure — Curve sketching — systematic approach
Figure 1 — Cubic : local max , local min , inflection at the origin.

Verify: directly compute karo: ✓; ✓; (max) ✓; (min) ✓; (inflection height) ✓. (Machine-checked below.)


Example 2 — Degenerate critical point (flat inflection) · cell B

Step 1 — First derivative aur uska sign. Yeh har jagah hai, sirf par ke barabar. Toh ka sign par nahi badalti — dono taraf hai. Ye step kyun? First Derivative Test kehta hai ki extremum ke liye sign change chahiye. Change nahi → max nahi, min nahi.

Step 2 — Second derivative. jo par sign change karta hai. Toh ek inflection point hai — lekin horizontal tangent ke saath. Yeh ek flat (stationary) inflection hai. Ye step kyun? Yeh parent ke mistake-callout ko action mein dikhata hai: akela guarantee nahi karta extremum.

Verify: aur (dono taraf same sign ⇒ koi extremum nahi); aur (concavity flip ⇒ inflection). (Machine-checked below.)


Example 3 — Rational with horizontal wall & twin vertical walls, even · cells C, D, F

Step 1 — Domain & symmetry. , par, toh domain hai . Aur even, -axis ke upar mirror. Ye step kyun? Even symmetry se hum study karke reflect kar sakte hain.

Step 2 — Asymptotes (limits explicitly). Vertical: jaise , denominator , numerator , toh ; jaise , denominator , toh . (Evenness se ke walls yahi mirror karte hain.) Horizontal: upar aur neeche se divide karo: Ye step kyun? Asymptotes woh skeleton hain jis par curve drapeti hai; sided limits batate hain ki curve kis direction mein har wall se escape karta hai.

Step 3 — First derivative (quotient rule). Denominator ek square hai, hamesha . Toh ka sign ka sign hai: ke liye positive, ke liye negative → local max at . Ye step kyun? ka sign climb/fall deta hai; domain mein sirf ek critical point hai .

Step 4 — Value regions. ke liye: toh (curve -axis ke neeche baithta hai, origin par peak karta hai). ke liye: (ceiling ke upar). Second derivative , par (concave up) aur par (concave down); koi inflection nahi kyunki sign sirf forbidden ke across flip hota hai. Ye step kyun? Curve ko har region mein uske asymptotes ke relative locate karta hai.

Neeche ka figure — kya observe karna hai. par do plum dashed verticals walls hain; teal dashed horizontal par ceiling hai. Beech ki strip mein orange curve ek low hump banata hai jo ink dot par peak karta hai aur har wall ke paas jaate hi mein dive karta hai. Walls ke bahar dono orange branches ke upar hain aur door jaate jaate uski taraf sweep karte hain. Poori picture -axis ke across mirror-symmetric hai — yahi evenness hai.

Figure — Curve sketching — systematic approach
Figure 2 — : walls at , ceiling , even hump peaking at the origin.

Verify: ; ; (concave down ⇒ max); ; . (Machine-checked below.)


Example 4 — Rational with ek oblique (slant) asymptote · cell E

Step 1 — Long division se line reveal karo. Jaise , term , toh curve line se chipak jaata hai. Woh line oblique asymptote hai. Ye step kyun? Polynomial division "line part" ko ek remainder se alag karta hai jo infinity par vanish ho jaata hai — bilkul parent ka oblique-asymptote recipe. Formula se cross-check karo, kis direction of infinity har limit use karta hai yeh carefully state karte hue: Yahi do limits par lene par identical milta hai, toh single line dono ends par asymptote hai.

Step 2 — Vertical asymptote & domain. Domain . Jaise , ; jaise , . Toh ek two-signed vertical wall hai. Ye step kyun? Denominator zero with non-zero numerator ⇒ genuine blow-up.

Step 3 — Symmetry & first derivative (full monotonicity). odd. Denominator hamesha, toh ka sign ka sign hai. Saare char intervals walk karo, critical points aur wall se split karke:

  • : increasing.
  • : decreasing.
  • : decreasing.
  • : increasing.

Toh left branch par curve tak rise karke wall mein fall karta hai, local max at deta hai; right branch par wall se tak fall karta hai phir rise karta hai, local min at deta hai. Ye step kyun? ka interval-by-interval sign poori monotonicity picture hai, aur / changes extrema pin karte hain.

Step 4 — Second derivative (concavity, all cases). ka sign sirf ka sign hai:

  • : concave up (right branch upward cup karta hai, slant line ke upar baitha hai).
  • : concave down (left branch downward cap karta hai, ke neeche baitha hai).

Koi inflection point nahi hai: sirf forbidden ke across sign change karta hai, domain ke kisi point par nahi. Concavity extrema bhi confirm karta hai — (min ✓), (max ✓). Ye step kyun? Second derivative test bending complete karta hai aur hidden inflection rule out karta hai.

Neeche ka figure — kya observe karna hai. Teal dashed line corner to corner run karta hai; do burnt-orange branches plum vertical wall ke ek-ek taraf hain. Right branch plum minimum tak dip karta hai slant line ke thoda upar (concave up), left branch teal maximum tak rise karta hai thoda neeche (concave down). Har branch origin se door jaate jaate ki taraf flatten hoti hai — yahi curve apne slant asymptote se "chipakna" hai.

Figure — Curve sketching — systematic approach
Figure 3 — : slant asymptote , wall , min , max .

Verify: slant slope , intercept ; , ; (min), (max); ka par aur par change. (Machine-checked below.)


Example 5 — Ek curve jo apni horizontal asymptote cross karta hai · cell G

Step 1 — Horizontal asymptote. Ye step kyun? Top ka degree bottom ka degree ⇒ curve infinity par -axis ke paas flatten ho jaata hai.

Step 2 — Crossing point. set karo: . Curve origin se guzarta hai — jo par hi lie karta hai. Toh yeh apni khud ki asymptote ko par cross karta hai. Ye step kyun? Asymptote ek end-behaviour statement hai, barrier nahi; solve karne se crossing locate hoti hai.

Step 3 — Turning points (bounded bump). (max), (min). Curve origin se rise karke par ek gentle peak banata hai, phir ki taraf wapas fall karta hai. Ye step kyun? Shape confirm karta hai: do humps ek crossing ke dono taraf origin par.

Neeche ka figure — kya observe karna hai. Teal dashed line horizontal asymptote hai, aur burnt-orange curve origin par ink square se seedha cross karta hai — asymptote koi fence nahi hai. Curve plum maximum tak rise karta hai, phir axis ki taraf wapas ease karta hai; oddness se yeh plum minimum tak left par mirror karta hai. Dono directions mein door jaate jaate yeh par settle ho jaata hai, right se upar se aur left se neeche se.

Figure — Curve sketching — systematic approach
Figure 4 — : crosses its horizontal asymptote at the origin, max , min .

Verify: ; (asymptote par); , . (Machine-checked below.)


Example 6 — Degenerate input: removable hole vs blow-up · cell H

Step 1 — mein removable hole test karo. plug karne se milta hai — yeh ek indeterminate form hai, automatically nahi. Factor karo: cancel ho jaata hai, toh sirf line hai par ek hole punch karke (woh value hoti). Ye step kyun? Limits ek ko alag karte hain jo simplify hota hai (removable) ek se (true pole).

Step 2 — mein pole test karo (dono one-sided limits). par, hai non-zero numerator ke saath, toh yeh cancel nahi ho sakta. Har side alag lelo:

  • Jaise , denominator (small positive), toh .
  • Jaise , denominator (small negative), toh .

Kyunki dono one-sided limits opposite infinities ki taraf jaate hain, ek genuine two-sided vertical asymptote hai — curve wall ke right par upar shoot karta hai aur left par neeche. Ye step kyun? Nonzero over zero kabhi remove nahi ho sakta; har side par tiny denominator ka sign fix karta hai ki branch kis infinity ko chase karta hai.

Verify: (finite ⇒ removable hole; , par undefined hai lekin limit exist karti hai). ke liye: , (two-signed pole). (Machine-checked below.)


Example 7 — Word problem: cost-per-unit curve ki shape · cell I

Step 1 — Simplify (slant asymptote disguise mein spot karo). Bade ke liye, (rising line); chhote ke liye, term dominate karta hai aur . Ek minimum beech mein hi hoga. Ye step kyun? Ye Example 4 ka structure ek real curve par apply hai; slant large-scale trend batata hai. Ye exactly Optimization mein study kiya gaya "find the lowest point" wala question hai.

Step 2 — First derivative se minimize karo. Check karo ki minimum hai: for → concave up → minimum. Ye step kyun? Optimization: ek smooth positive curve ka lowest point wahan hota hai jahan slope aur .

Step 3 — Minimum value. Ye step kyun? Physical question ka jawab deta hai: (hundred) items banana sabse sasta average cost deta hai, $40 each.

Verify: critical ( ka positive root); dollars/item; (concave up ⇒ minimum). Units: dollars per item, poore mein consistent. (Machine-checked below.)


Example 8 — Exam twist: behaviour ek parameter par depend karta hai · cell J

Step 1 — Differentiate karo aur critical points locate karo. solve karo. Ye step kyun? Turning points sirf wahan exist karte hain jahan ke real solutions hon. Kya ke real roots hain yeh completely right-hand side ke sign par depend karta hai.

Step 2 — ke sign par case split (teeno regimes).

  • : toh , toh do distinct real critical points hain — ek local max aur ek local min: genuine wiggle wali S-curve. Example se wapas milta hai Example 1 se, roots par. Do turning points.
  • : toh , sirf par zero aur koi sign change nahi — yeh Example 2 ka flat (stationary) inflection hai. Zero turning points.
  • : toh , toh ka koi real solution nahi; waise bhi har jagah hai, toh curve strictly increasing hai koi flat spot ke bina. Zero turning points.

Ye step kyun? Sirf ek quantity (positive, zero, ya negative) hinge hai; teeno bullets parameter ki har possible value exhaust karte hain.

Step 3 — Concluding summary.

Sign of ke real roots Turning points Shape
do () 2 (max & min) wiggling S
ek (), koi sign change nahi 0 flat inflection cubic
koi nahi 0 strictly increasing

Toh cubic ka genuine "hill and valley" sirf tab hota hai jab ; par aur saare ke liye woh monotonically climb karti hai. Transition value hai. Ye step kyun? Reader ko exam mein quote karne ke liye ek-line rule deta hai: "do turning points iff ."

Verify: se critical points milte hain (do real); se sirf milta hai with (koi sign change nahi, zero turning points); se har jagah milta hai (koi real critical points nahi). (Machine-checked below.)


Recall Matrix ke across self-test

Har curve ko uski defining feature se match karo (answers neeche). ::: do turning points, odd (cell A/F) ::: flat inflection, koi extremum nahi (cell B) ::: horizontal + twin vertical asymptotes, even (C/D/F) ::: oblique asymptote (cell E) ::: origin par apni horizontal asymptote cross karta hai (cell G) ::: par removable hole, pole nahi (cell H)


Connections