4.1.16 · D3Calculus I — Limits & Derivatives

Worked examples — Chain rule — proof, composite function derivatives

3,579 words16 min readBack to topic

Everywhere below, "the machine" language is: outer function , inner function , composite , and the rule is derivative of the outside (inside left frozen) times derivative of the inside.


The scenario matrix

Before working anything, let's list every class of case a chain-rule problem can be. Each worked example below is tagged with the cell it fills.

Cell Case class What's special / what can go wrong Example
A Power-of-polynomial (positive inner) Basic peel; sign of answer follows Ex 1
B Trig inside polynomial Must keep inside intact () Ex 2
C Triple / multi-nesting One factor per layer Ex 3
D Inside evaluates to zero at a point Is still defined? Check the outer at Ex 4
E Degenerate: a gear's rate at the point Whole product collapses to Ex 5
F Limiting / blow-up (denominator ) Derivative ; which sign? Ex 6
G Negative / all-sign inner (quadrant sweep) Answer changes sign across regions Ex 7
H Word problem — related rates Chain rule in time; carry units Ex 8
I Exam twist — abstract with a table No formula for ; use given values Ex 9
J Trig-inside-trig (non-power nesting) Both layers are transcendental Ex 10

The rest of the page fills each cell.


Cell A — power of a polynomial


Cell B — trig inside a polynomial (keep the inside intact)


Cell C — triple nesting


Cell D — the inside hits zero

This is the case people fear from the proof (the "" worry). Let's see it concretely.


Cell E — degenerate: a gear's rate is zero


Cell F — limiting / blow-up (derivative )


Cell G — all-sign inner (a quadrant/region sweep)



Cell I — exam twist (abstract from a table, no formula)


Cell J — trig-inside-trig (both layers transcendental)


Recall Self-test: name the cell, then solve

Cover the worked solutions. For each, first say which matrix cell it is, then differentiate.

Differentiate . ::: Cell A: . Differentiate (watch the trap). ::: Cell B: , not . Differentiate ; how many factors? ::: Cell C: ; three layers → three factors. Is defined where the inside of is zero? Value at ? ::: Cell D: yes; . Why is for ? ::: Cell E: the inner rate at , collapsing the product. What is ? ::: Cell F: (tangent goes vertical, falling). Where does have horizontal tangents, and which is a true min? ::: Cell G: ; only is a min (others are saddle-flats). Balloon: at , ? ::: Cell H: . From the table, where ? ::: Cell I: . Differentiate . ::: Cell J: .

Connections

  • Chain rule — proof, composite function derivatives — the parent; this page is its applied stress-test.
  • Related rates — Cell H is a direct related-rates use of .
  • Derivative — limit definition — Cells D–F lean on the limit meaning of a derivative (blow-up, zero rate).
  • Product rule and Quotient rule — often combined with the chain rule in tougher exam problems.
  • Implicit differentiation — the abstract- mindset of Cell I generalises here.
  • Inverse function derivative and Continuity implies differentiability fails converse — related follow-ups.

Concept Map

all use

all use

Scenario matrix

Cell A power of poly

Cell B trig inside poly

Cell C triple nesting

Cell D inside equals zero

Cell E gear rate zero

Cell F blow-up to infinity

Cell G all-sign inner

Cell H related rates units

Cell I abstract f table

Cell J trig inside trig

DOTI multiply outer by inner