Exercises — Chain rule — proof, composite function derivatives
4.1.16 · D4· Maths › Calculus I — Limits & Derivatives › Chain rule — proof, composite function derivatives
Ek-line ka tool jis par hum poore time rely karte hain:
Level 1 — Recognition
Kya tum outer function aur inner function identify kar sakte ho, aur rule ek baar apply kar sakte ho?
Problem 1.1
ko differentiate karo.
Recall Solution 1.1
Do machines identify karo. Outer , inner . Dono ko differentiate karo. (shell par power rule); (ek line ki derivative). Multiply karo, inside ko wapas plug in karo.
Problem 1.2
ko differentiate karo.
Recall Solution 1.2
Outer . Inner . Notice karo ki inside hi rehta hai ke andar — sirf outer rate change hoti hai.
Problem 1.3
ko differentiate karo.
Recall Solution 1.3
Outer (exponential apni khud ki derivative hai). Inner .
Level 2 — Application
Chain rule ko power, product-of-constants, aur known derivatives ke saath combine karo.
Problem 2.1
ko differentiate karo.
Recall Solution 2.1
ki tarah rewrite karo. Outer . Inner . aur mil kar banaate hain — clean cancellation.
Problem 2.2
ko differentiate karo.
Recall Solution 2.2
Outer . Inner .
Problem 2.3
ko differentiate karo.
Recall Solution 2.3
Outer . Inner . Note karo ki hamesha hota hai, isliye saare ke liye defined hai aur koi domain ki chinta nahi hoti.
Level 3 — Analysis
Multiple layers, aur chain rule ko Product rule / Quotient rule ke saath combine karna.
Problem 3.1
ko differentiate karo (matlab ).
Recall Solution 3.1
Teen layers hain: sabse baahri cube, phir , phir . Bahar se andar peel karo.
- Cube: , par evaluate kiya ⇒ .
- : derivative .
- : derivative . Teeno ko multiply karo:
Problem 3.2
ko differentiate karo.
Recall Solution 3.2
Yeh ek product hai , aur doosre factor ko chain rule ki zaroorat hai. Product rule: jahan , .
- .
- (chain rule: outer , inner ). Assemble karo:
Problem 3.3
ko differentiate karo.
Recall Solution 3.3
Quotient rule: jahan , .
- .
- (chain rule).
- . Andar wali fraction clear karne ke liye upar aur neeche se multiply karo:
Level 4 — Synthesis
Composite khud banao: implicit differentiation aur inverse-function derivatives chain rule hi hain chhupe hue.
Problem 4.1
Curve , se guzarti hai. Implicit differentiation use karke, wahan nikalo.
Recall Solution 4.1
ko ka function maano: tab ek composite hai, isliye iske derivative ko chain rule chahiye: ke dono sides differentiate karo: par: . Geometry check: tak radius ki slope hai; tangent perpendicular hai, slope . ✓ (figure dekho).

Problem 4.2
Maano (strictly increasing hai, isliye invertible hai). Inverse function derivative use karke nikalo.
Recall Solution 4.2
Identity ek composite hai. Dono sides ko chain-rule karo: nikalo: solve karo. try karo: . ✓ Toh . , isliye .
Problem 4.3
Ek balloon ek sphere hai jiska volume hai. Hawa pump ki jaati hai taaki ho. Related rates use karke, par nikalo.
Recall Solution 4.3
, par depend karta hai, aur , par depend karta hai — ek composite . Leibniz form mein chain rule: . par: .
Level 5 — Mastery
Subtle cases: repeated nesting, proof ki apni machinery, aur jahan naïve cancellation break ho jaati.
Problem 5.1
ko differentiate karo (yeh genuinely triple nest hai).
Recall Solution 5.1
Layers, bahar se andar: , phir , phir .
- ki derivative par: .
- ki derivative par: .
- ki derivative: . Teeno ko multiply karo:
Problem 5.2
Maano jab aur . Yeh jaana jaata hai ki . Yeh , jaate waqt infinitely baar hit karta hai, isliye infinitely baar zero hota hai nonzero ke liye. Ek paragraph mein explain karo ki ke liye chain rule phir bhi kyun deta hai, bhale hi naïve "divide by " derivation yahan illegal hai.
Recall Solution 5.2
Error-function proof kabhi se divide nahi karta. Parent note se yaad karo: aur ke saath, likho set karo. Yeh equation ek multiplication hai, valid tab bhi jab ho (dono sides tab hain). se divide karo: Jaise : continuous ⇒ ⇒ , aur . Toh poora product ho jaata hai. Infinitely baar zero hone wale koi nuksaan nahi pahulichate kyunki woh kabhi denominator mein nahi hote. Yahi woh pathology hai jiske baare mein parent note mein [!mistake] "steel-man" ne warning di thi.
Problem 5.3
Rigorous proof mein term iss baat par rely karta hai ki ho. ki kaun si ek property guarantee karti hai ki hone par ho, aur kaun sa theorem yeh supply karta hai?
Recall Solution 5.3
ki continuity par: , yaani . Yeh guaranteed hai kyunki differentiable hai, aur differentiable ⇒ continuous — dekho Continuity implies differentiability fails converse. (Converse fail hota hai: continuity akele humein nahi dega, jo hume factor ke liye bhi chahiye.)
Connections
- Chain rule — proof, composite function derivatives — parent note; har problem iske rule ka ek application hai.
- Derivative — limit definition — proof ke peeche difference quotient ka source (5.2, 5.3).
- Product rule · Quotient rule — L3 mein chain rule ke saath combine kiye gaye.
- Implicit differentiation — par chain rule (4.1).
- Inverse function derivative — par chain rule (4.2).
- Related rates — mein chain rule (4.3).
- Continuity implies differentiability fails converse — supply karta hai (5.3).