4.1.12 · D3 · Maths › Calculus I — Limits & Derivatives › Power rule — proof for integer, rational exponents
Intuition Yeh page kis liye hai
Parent note ne prove kiya tha ki d x d x n = n x n − 1 har tarah ke exponent ke liye. Yeh page us rule ki practice karaati hai. Hum har woh case cover karenge jo yeh rule de sakta hai — positive integer, negative integer, fraction, root, irrational exponent, ek aisa case jahan differentiate karne se pehle rewrite karna padega , ek real-world rate, aur ek exam trap jo power rule jaise dikhta hai lekin hai nahi. Kisi ko bhi test mein aisa scenario nahi milna chahiye jiska rehearsal yahan nahi hua ho.
Symbols se pehle, ek reminder ki har symbol ka kya matlab hai — sab ko achhi tarah samjho:
Definition Woh symbols jo hum har jagah use karte hain
x — input , ek aisi number jise hum thoda badal sakte hain (graph par horizontal position).
x n — "x apne aap se multiply hota hai, n ke pattern ke hisaab se". Agar n = 3 hai to yeh x ⋅ x ⋅ x hai; agar n = − 2 hai to yeh x ⋅ x 1 hai; agar n = 2 1 hai to yeh x hai.
h — ek tiny nudge jo hum x mein add karte hain. Slope ko measure kiya jaata hai x + h par height aur x par height ke beech compare karke, phir h ko 0 ki taraf shrink karke (yeh hai Limit definition of the derivative ). Jab bhi "h → 0 " dikhe, socho nudge gayab ho raha hai.
d x d ( ) — "jo kuch bhi andar hai uske graph ka slope , position x par". Slope hota hai rise over run : curve kitne units upar chadh jaati hai ek unit seedhe jaane par. Bada slope = steep hill; slope 0 = flat zameen; negative slope = neeche utarna.
Power rule us slope ka shortcut hai: exponent ko front par drop karo, phir exponent ko ek se kam karo.
Intuition Ek caveat jo hum baar baar dohraate rahenge
Slope formula ka matlab tab hi hota hai jahan original function exist karta ho aur smooth ho . Isliye har example mein hum yeh bhi poochhte hain: kis x ke liye yeh actually valid hai? Jahan curve mein koi hole ho, vertical tangent ho, ya sharp corner ho, wahan formula ko dhyan se padhna chahiye.
Definition "Cusp" kya hota hai? (hum ise Ex 4 mein milenge)
Cusp ek curve par sharp point hota hai jahan do pieces mil to jaate hain lekin tangent line achanak direction badal leti hai — jaise heart ki pointed tip ya letter "V" ka bottom. Left se aate waqt tangent ek taraf jhukta hai; right se aate waqt bilkul ulti taraf; aur exactly tip par dono directions agree nahi karte, isliye koi single slope exist nahi karta . Sochiye ek pahad ki sharp corner: exactly tip par koi ek "steepness" nahi hoti. Isse smooth curve se compare karo, jahan tangent dheere dheere mudta hai aur hamesha ek clear direction rakhta hai. (Ex 4 mein x 2/3 ki tip wali figure dekho.)
Is poore topic mein har problem neeche ke cells mein se ek hoti hai. Jo examples aate hain woh us cell ke saath tagged hain jo woh cover karte hain.
Cell
Case class
Kya tricky hai isme
Example
A
Positive integer exponent
kuch nahi — "easy" base case
Ex 1
B
Exponent = 0 / plain constant
flat line ka slope 0 hota hai
Ex 2
C
Negative integer exponent
answer ka sign flip hota hai; x = 0 par undefined
Ex 3
D
Rational exponent / root
fraction arithmetic; x = 0 par cusp
Ex 4
E
"Hidden" power — pehle algebra chahiye
3 x , x 5 1 , x x 2 ko x n ke roop mein rewrite karna hoga
Ex 5
F
Ek point par slope evaluate karo (sign of slope)
kya curve wahan upar ja raha hai ya neeche?
Ex 6
G
Degenerate / undefined input
slope blow up hota hai jab x → 0
Ex 7
H
Real-world rate (with units)
word problem; units sahi rakhni hain
Ex 8
I
Irrational exponent
kya x π ke liye shortcut kaam karta hai?
Ex 9
J
Exam twist — power rule jaisa lagta hai lekin hai nahi
2 x exponential hai, power nahi
Ex 10
f ( x ) = x 7 ko differentiate karo.
Forecast: answer cover karo aur guess karo. 7 drop karo, exponent kam karo... kya milta hai?
Step 1 — n identify karo. Yahan n = 7 hai, ek positive whole number.
Yeh step kyun? Rule d x d x n = n x n − 1 ke liye pehle n ko name karna zaroori hai, taaki pata chale kya drop karna hai aur kya subtract karna hai.
Step 2 — exponent ko front par drop karo. Isse 7 ka factor milta hai.
Yeh step kyun? Yeh mnemonic ka pehla "Drop" hai.
Step 3 — exponent ko ek se kam karo. 7 − 1 = 6 .
f ′ ( x ) = 7 x 6 .
Yeh step kyun? Nudge h yaad karo: jab ( x + h ) 7 − x 7 expand karte ho aur h se divide karte ho, to 7 x 6 ke siwa har term mein h ka factor rehta hai, isliye woh terms 0 ho jaati hain jab nudge gayab hota hai. Sirf 7 x 6 bachta hai.
Valid kahan? Har jagah — polynomial sabhi x ke liye smooth hoti hai.
Verify: x = 1 par, f ′ ( 1 ) = 7 . First principles se slope check karo tiny h = 0.001 ke saath: 0.001 1.00 1 7 − 1 ≈ 7.02 — 7 ke kaafi paas. ✓
g ( x ) = x 0 differentiate karo, aur alag se c ( x ) = 5 .
Forecast: x 0 equals 1 hota hai (koi bhi nonzero number ko zero power 1 hota hai). y = 1 ka graph ek flat horizontal line hai. Flat zameen ka slope kya hota hai?
Step 1 — dono ko constants recognize karo. x 0 = 1 aur 5 dono sirf numbers hain; unke graphs horizontal lines hain.
Yeh step kyun? Horizontal line kabhi rise nahi karti, isliye uska rise-over-run har jagah 0 hai.
Step 2 — x 0 par rule apply karo. n = 0 ke saath: 0 ⋅ x − 1 = 0.
g ′ ( x ) = 0 , c ′ ( x ) = 0.
Yeh step kyun? Jo factor hum "front par drop" karte hain woh 0 hai, jo poori cheez zero kar deta hai — flat-line intuition se match karta hai.
Valid kahan? c ( x ) = 5 ke liye, har jagah. g ( x ) = x 0 ke liye, x = 0 ko chhod kar har jagah (0 0 defined nahi hai) — lekin slope 0 hai har us point par jahan yeh defined hai.
Verify: kisi bhi horizontal line ka slope 0 hota hai. ✓ (Koi units nahi, koi motion nahi — kuch nahi badlta.)
f ( x ) = x − 5 differentiate karo.
Forecast: answer ke aage negative number hoga. Guess karo: − 5 drop karo, phir − 5 − 1 = ?
Step 1 — n identify karo. n = − 5 .
Yeh step kyun? Rule kisi bhi real n ke liye kaam karta hai; parent note ne negative-integer case ko x − 5 = 1/ x 5 likh kar aur common denominator lekar prove kiya tha, isliye hum shortcut seedha apply kar sakte hain.
Step 2 — n ko front par drop karo. − 5 ka factor.
Step 3 — exponent ko ek se kam karo. − 5 − 1 = − 6 . Trap yeh hai ki log add kar dete hain: yeh subtract hai, isliye yeh aur zyada negative hota jaata hai.
f ′ ( x ) = − 5 x − 6 = x 6 − 5 .
Yeh step kyun? Negative-integer exponent ka general pattern hai d x d x − k = − k x − k − 1 (yahan whole number k = 5 hai).
Valid kahan? Sabhi x = 0 ke liye. Original function x − 5 = 1/ x 5 khud x = 0 par undefined hai (zero se divide nahi kar sakte), isliye na function exist karta hai na slope — formula − 5/ x 6 sahi tarah se blow up karta hai jab x → 0 .
Verify: f = 1/ x 5 positive hai aur x > 0 ke liye decreasing hai (bada x ⇒ chhoti value), isliye slope negative hona chahiye — aur − 5/ x 6 wahan negative hi hai. ✓
f ( x ) = x 2/3 differentiate karo.
Forecast: n = 3 2 . Front factor 3 2 hai; naya exponent 3 2 − 1 hai. 3 2 − 1 kya hota hai?
Step 1 — n = 3 2 identify karo (yeh 3 x 2 hai, x 2 ka cube root).
Yeh step kyun? Hum x 2/3 ko nudge h ke saath whole powers ki tarah expand nahi kar sakte, isliye parent note ne alag raasta liya: y = x 2/3 rakho, dono sides cube karo to y 3 = x 2 milta hai — ab dono exponents whole numbers hain , jinhe hum differentiate karna jaante hain. Us relation ko differentiate karne par (Implicit differentiation , kyunki y secretly x par depend karta hai) exactly wahi shortcut n x n − 1 milta hai. Toh "drop and lower" fractions ke liye bhi kaam karta hai.
Step 2 — 3 2 ko front par drop karo.
Step 3 — exponent se 1 subtract karo. 1 = 3 3 likho, to 3 2 − 3 3 = − 3 1 .
f ′ ( x ) = 3 2 x − 1/3 = 3 3 x 2 .
Yeh step kyun? Common mistake 3 2 − 1 mein fumble karna hai; pehle 1 ko 3 3 mein convert karo.
Valid kahan? Kyunki cube root negative numbers ke liye bhi defined hai, f ( x ) = x 2/3 sabhi x ke liye exist karta hai — lekin slope 3 3 x 2 x = 0 par undefined hai. Wahan curve mein ek cusp hai (upar define kiya gaya — sharp point jahan tangent flip hota hai): left se aate waqt tangent steeply up-left point karta hai, right se steeply up-right, aur dono agree nahi karte, isliye x = 0 par koi single slope exist nahi karta (figure mein sharp tip dekho). x < 0 ke liye formula abhi bhi apply hota hai (jaise x = − 8 par, 3 − 8 = − 2 , to f ′ ( − 8 ) = 3 ⋅ ( − 2 ) 2 = − 3 1 : curve left branch par neeche jaati hai).
Verify: x = 8 par: f ′ ( 8 ) = 3 2 ⋅ 8 − 1/3 = 3 2 ⋅ 2 1 = 3 1 . Numerically 0.001 8.00 1 2/3 − 8 2/3 ≈ 0.333 . Aur x = − 8 par: f ′ ( − 8 ) = − 3 1 . ✓
f ( x ) = x x 2 differentiate karo.
Forecast: power rule ko seedha fraction par apply nahi kar sakte. Pehle guess karo: kya isko single x something ke roop mein rewrite kar sakte hain?
Step 1 — ek power ke roop mein rewrite karo. x = x 1/2 , aur divide karne se exponents subtract hote hain:
x 1/2 x 2 = x 2 − 1/2 = x 3/2 .
Yeh step kyun? Power rule sirf x n dekhta hai. Expression ko ek clean x 3/2 mein badalna hi poori ladaai hai; phir differentiation trivial ho jaata hai.
Step 2 — n = 2 3 ke saath rule apply karo. 2 3 drop karo; naya exponent 2 3 − 1 = 2 1 .
f ′ ( x ) = 2 3 x 1/2 = 2 3 x .
Yeh step kyun? Yahan "differentiate karne se pehle rewrite karo" tumhe Quotient rule se bachata hai, jo yahan slower aur error-prone hoti.
Valid kahan? x > 0 ke liye (original mein x ko non-negative input chahiye, aur division ke liye x = 0 ).
Verify: x = 4 par: f ′ ( 4 ) = 2 3 4 = 2 3 ⋅ 2 = 3 . Numeric slope 0.001 f ( 4.001 ) − f ( 4 ) ≈ 3.0 . ✓
f ( x ) = x 3 ke liye, x = − 2 aur x = 2 par slope nikalo. Kya curve wahan upar ja rahi hai ya neeche?
Forecast: x 3 ek connected curve hai. Guess karo: kya yeh kabhi downhill jaati hai?
Step 1 — differentiate karo. f ′ ( x ) = 3 x 2 (Cell A: n = 3 ).
Step 2 — dono points mein plug in karo.
f ′ ( − 2 ) = 3 ( − 2 ) 2 = 3 ⋅ 4 = 12 , f ′ ( 2 ) = 3 ( 2 ) 2 = 12.
Yeh step kyun? ( − 2 ) 2 = + 4 — squaring sign khatam kar deta hai. Toh slope dono points par + 12 hai. Tangent lines equally steep hain aur dono uphill point karti hain.
Step 3 — geometry padho (neeche figure dekho: red tangent lines dono upar chadh rahi hain).
Dono x = ± 2 par: slope = 12 > 0 ⇒ curve rise kar rahi hai.
Yeh step kyun? Kyunki 3 x 2 ≥ 0 sabhi x ke liye, cubic kabhi downhill nahi jaati — yeh fact sign check kiye bina miss ho jaata.
Valid kahan? Har jagah — smooth polynomial.
Verify: f ′ ( x ) = 3 x 2 sirf x = 0 par zero hai aur baki jagah positive; ± 2 par slopes dono 12 hain. ✓
f ( x ) = x = x 1/2 ke liye, jab x → 0 + to slope ka kya hota hai?
Forecast: x = 0 ke paas x curve almost vertical lagti hai. Guess karo: kya slope finite rehti hai ya infinity tak jaati hai?
Step 1 — differentiate karo. n = 2 1 , to f ′ ( x ) = 2 1 x − 1/2 = 2 x 1 (Cell D).
Step 2 — limit probe karo. Jab x → 0 + , x → 0 , to 2 x 1 → + ∞ .
lim x → 0 + f ′ ( x ) = + ∞.
Yeh step kyun? Formula valid rehta hai, lekin x = 0 par khud slope undefined hai — tangent vertical hai.
Step 3 — doosra end. Jab x → ∞ , 2 x 1 → 0 : curve flat ho jaati hai.
Yeh step kyun? Dono limiting directions cover karna hi is cell ka point hai — 0 ke paas steep, door flat (figure dekho).
Valid kahan? x > 0 ke liye. x = 0 par tangent vertical hai (koi finite slope nahi); x x < 0 ke liye defined nahi hai.
Verify: f ′ ( 0.01 ) = 2 0.01 1 = 0.2 1 = 5 (bada); f ′ ( 100 ) = 2 ⋅ 10 1 = 0.05 (chhota). ✓
Worked example Ek balloon ka volume
V ( r ) = 3 4 π r 3 (cm3 , radius r cm mein) hai. Jab r = 5 cm ho to volume har cm radius ke saath kitni tezi se badhta hai?
Forecast: "volume kitni tezi se badhta hai per cm radius" ek slope hai: d r d V . Guess karo r ki kaunsi power bachti hai.
Step 1 — differentiate karo, 3 4 π ko constant multiplier maanke. n = 3 ke saath: d r d r 3 = 3 r 2 .
d r d V = 3 4 π ⋅ 3 r 2 = 4 π r 2 .
Yeh step kyun? Front par constant bas saath aa jaata hai — power rule sirf r 3 par act karta hai. (Dhyan do 4 π r 2 surface area hai — ek pyaara sanity signpost.)
Step 2 — r = 5 par evaluate karo.
d r d V r = 5 = 4 π ( 25 ) = 100 π ≈ 314.16 cm 3 per cm .
Yeh step kyun? Question ne specific radius poochhi; algebra ke baad ant mein plug in karo.
Valid kahan? r > 0 ke liye (physical radius positive hoti hai).
Verify: units hain cm cm 3 = cm 2 (ek area rate — surface area se match karta hai). Numerically 0.001 V ( 5.001 ) − V ( 5 ) ≈ 314.2 . ✓
f ( x ) = x π differentiate karo (haan, exponent woh number π ≈ 3.14159 hai).
Forecast: kya "drop and lower" tab bhi kaam karta hai jab exponent fraction bhi nahi hai?
Step 1 — check karo ki rule abhi bhi apply hoti hai. π ek real number hai, aur power rule har real exponent ke liye prove kiya gaya tha — 7 22 jaise fraction isko maante hain, aur π aise fractions ka limit hai, isliye shortcut bina kisi badlaav ke carry over karta hai.
Yeh step kyun? Hum ( x + h ) π ko nudge se expand nahi kar sakte (non-whole power ke liye koi finite expansion exist nahi karta), isliye hum is baat par rely karte hain ki rule sabhi real n tak extend hota hai — bas π ko "just a number" ki tarah treat karo.
Step 2 — π ko front par drop karo, exponent ek se kam karo.
f ′ ( x ) = π x π − 1 .
Yeh step kyun? Hamesha ki tarah same mechanical move; bas oddity yeh hai ki naya exponent π − 1 ≈ 2.14159 khud irrational hai — koi baat nahi.
Valid kahan? x > 0 ke liye (x π jaise general real power sirf positive bases ke liye defined hoti hai).
Verify: x = 1 par exact answer f ′ ( 1 ) = π ⋅ 1 π − 1 = π ≈ 3.1416 hai. Ise Limit definition of the derivative se confirm karne ke liye, tiny nudge use karo taaki secant slope (do nearby points ke beech rise over run) tangent slope ke paas aaye: h f ( 1 + h ) − f ( 1 ) jab h = 0.001 to 0.001 1.00 1 π − 1 π = 0.001 1.003146 − 1 ≈ 3.146 milta hai. Yeh step kyun? Jab h → 0 to yeh secant slope true derivative π ≈ 3.1416 ki taraf converge karta hai, aur 3.146 already kaafi close hai (bada h overshoot karta kyunki curve bend karti hai). ✓
f ( x ) = 2 x differentiate karo. (Dhyan se — kya yeh power rule problem hai?)
Forecast: x ⋅ 2 x − 1 likhne ka mann karta hai. Ruko: variable kaun hai — base ya exponent?
Step 1 — structure diagnose karo. x n mein base variable hai , exponent fixed hai. 2 x mein base fixed hai (2 ) aur exponent variable hai . Yeh dono ulti cheezein hain.
Yeh step kyun? Power rule variable base, constant exponent ke liye prove kiya gaya tha. Yeh yahan bilkul apply nahi hoti — ise use karna ek category error hai.
Step 2 — iske bajaay exponential rule use karo (dekho Derivative of exponential functions ):
d x d a x = a x ln a ⇒ d x d 2 x = 2 x ln 2.
Yeh step kyun? Yeh sahi tool hai; ln 2 ≈ 0.693 base 2 ka "growth constant" hai.
Valid kahan? Har jagah — 2 x sabhi real x ke liye defined aur smooth hai.
Verify: x = 3 par: sahi answer 2 3 ln 2 = 8 ⋅ 0.693 ≈ 5.545 ; galat power-rule guess x 2 x − 1 = 3 ⋅ 4 = 12 — alag hai, confirm karta hai ki dono same rule nahi hain. ✓
Common mistake In examples ne jo traps defuse kiye
Negatives ke liye galat subtract karna (Ex 3): − 5 − 1 = − 6 , na ki − 4 .
n − 1 mein fraction arithmetic (Ex 4): subtract karne se pehle 1 ko 3 3 mein badlo.
Domain bhool jaana (Ex 3, 4, 7): slope formula sirf wahan valid hai jahan original function exist kare aur smooth ho — x = 0 par dhyan rakhna (division, vertical tangent, cusp).
Fraction ko seedha differentiate karna (Ex 5): pehle single x n ke roop mein rewrite karo.
x n aur n x ko confuse karna (Ex 10): variable base vs variable exponent.
Recall Self-test (pehle predict karo, phir reveal karo)
3 x 1 ko scratch se differentiate karo, aur batao yeh kahan valid hai.
::: x − 1/3 ke roop mein rewrite karo (Cell E). Phir n = − 3 1 : f ′ = − 3 1 x − 1/3 − 1 = − 3 1 x − 4/3 = 3 3 x 4 − 1 . x = 0 ke liye valid hai (x = 0 par undefined). ✓
d x d x 7 kya hai?7 x 6 .
d x d x 0 aur d x d 5 kya hain?Dono 0 hain (flat lines ka slope zero hota hai).
d x d x − 5 kya hai, aur yeh kahan valid hai?− 5 x − 6 = − 5/ x 6 ; x = 0 ke liye valid.
d x d x 2/3 kya hai, aur x = 0 par kya hota hai?3 2 x − 1/3 ; x = 0 par cusp hai, isliye wahan koi slope exist nahi karta.
Cusp kya hota hai? Curve par ek sharp point jahan tangent direction flip karta hai, isliye wahan koi single slope exist nahi karta.
x x 2 differentiate karne se pehle kya karna chahiye?Ek power ke roop mein rewrite karo: x 3/2 .
x 3 ka slope kabhi negative kyun nahi hota?f ′ = 3 x 2 ≥ 0 sabhi x ke liye (squares non-negative hote hain).
d x d x ka kya hota hai jab x → 0 + ?Yeh + ∞ tak jaata hai (vertical tangent; x = 0 par undefined).
d x d x π kya hai?π x π − 1 (rule har real exponent ke liye kaam karta hai; x > 0 ke liye valid).
V = 3 4 π r 3 ke liye d r d V kya hai?4 π r 2 (surface area).
Kya d x d 2 x = x 2 x − 1 sahi hai? Nahi — 2 x exponential hai; answer hai 2 x ln 2 .