4.1.4 · D5 · HinglishCalculus I — Limits & Derivatives
Question bank — Infinite limits and limits at infinity — vertical - horizontal asymptotes
4.1.4 · D5· Maths › Calculus I — Limits & Derivatives › Infinite limits and limits at infinity — vertical - horizont
True or false — justify
TF1. Agar undefined hai, toh ek vertical asymptote hai.
False. Undefined hone ka matlab ek removable hole bhi ho sakta hai (jaise par ). Vertical asymptote ke liye ek one-sided limit ka hona zaroori hai, sirf "yahan koi value nahi" kaafi nahi hai.
TF2. Agar exist nahi karta, toh par koi vertical asymptote nahi hai.
False. exist nahi karta (sides aapas mein disagree karti hain vs ), phir bhi ek vertical asymptote hai — ek buri side kaafi hai.
TF3. likhne ka matlab hai ki limit exist karti hai aur ek number ke barabar hai.
False. koi number nahi hai; yeh shorthand hai "har bound se zyada badhta hai" ke liye. Finite definition ke hisaab se limit exist nahi karti — hum sirf describe karte hain ki yeh kaise fail hoti hai.
TF4. Ek function apni horizontal asymptote ko cross kar sakta hai.
True. Asymptote sirf long-run () behaviour ko govern karta hai. jaisi curve ko infinitely baar cross karti hai phir bhi uski HA hai.
TF5. Ek function apni vertical asymptote ko cross kar sakta hai.
False. par function undefined hai (ya explode karta hai), isliye graph kabhi line ko touch ya cross nahi karta.
TF6. Har function mein zyada se zyada ek horizontal asymptote hoti hai.
False. Iski do ho sakti hain — ek se, ek se — jaise .
TF7. Ek rational function mein infinitely many vertical asymptotes ho sakti hain.
False. Vertical asymptotes denominator ke un zeros se aati hain jo cancel nahi hote; ek polynomial mein finitely many roots hote hain, isliye finitely many asymptotes hoti hain.
TF8. Agar ho toh function mein koi bhi asymptote nahi hoti.
False. Iski koi horizontal asymptote nahi hoti, lekin ek slant (oblique) asymptote ho sakti hai — dekho Slant (oblique) asymptotes via polynomial division.
TF9. har real ke liye.
False. Sirf ke liye. Agar toh yeh hai; agar toh yeh constant hai.
Spot the error
SE1. ", isliye ."
Error: hota hai, aur ke liye, hota hai. Sahi value hai; student ne sign flip ko ignore kiya.
SE2. " mein par ek vertical asymptote hai kyunki denominator wahaan hai."
Error: numerator bhi hai (form ). Cancel karne par milta hai, isliye yeh ek removable hole hai par, asymptote nahi. Dekho Continuity and removable discontinuities.
SE3. "."
Error: dono sides disagree karti hain — right se , left se — isliye ek single (two-sided) galat hai. Sahi yeh hai: limit exist nahi karti (haalaanki phir bhi ek VA hai). Dekho One-sided limits.
SE4. " nikaalte waqt plug in karo: ."
Error: indeterminate hai, nahi. Top aur bottom ko se divide karo taaki mile. (Ya L'Hôpital's rule for indeterminate forms use karo.)
SE5. " ki sides disagree karti hain, isliye DNE."
Error: dono sides se hota hai (square kabhi negative nahi hota), aur numerator hai, isliye dono sides deti hain. Limit hai ( par VA hai).
SE6. " (leading coefficients ka ratio)."
Error: leading-coefficient rule ke liye equal degrees chahiye. Yahaan top degree hai, isliye limit hai aur koi horizontal asymptote nahi hai.
SE7. "Kyunki ek vertical asymptote hai, aur dono hain."
Error: sirf ek side ka infinite hona kaafi hai, aur dono sides ke alag signs ho sakte hain (jaise : right se , left se ).
Why questions
WQ1. Limits at infinity ke liye hum highest power denominator mein (numerator mein nahi) se kyun divide karte hain?
Yeh denominator ko nonzero leading constant ki taraf le jaata hai, isliye fraction ek clean "constant over constant" ban jaata hai; baaki har term ek constant times ban jaati hai.
WQ2. Kisi nonzero number ko hoti cheez se divide karne par kyun milta hai?
Ek fixed nonzero top aur ek shrinking bottom ka matlab hai "ek fixed amount mein kitne tiny pieces fit hote hain" — yeh count bina kisi bound ke badhta hai; sign top aur bottom ke signs se ke paas fix hota hai.
WQ3. Ek vertical asymptote ke paas hum left aur right sides alag-alag kyun check karte hain?
Denominator ek side se positive values ke through approach kar sakta hai aur doosri side se negative values ke through, jo poore fraction ka sign flip kar deta hai — isliye dono directions alag-alag explode ho sakti hain.
WQ4. proven kyun hai, sirf "obvious" nahi?
Kyunki infinity par limit ka ek precise meaning hota hai: kisi bhi ke liye hum exhibit karte hain taaki hone par ho jaaye. Rigour wahi hai jo Limits — formal epsilon-delta definition demand karta hai.
WQ5. Equal-degree rationals ek nonzero horizontal asymptote kyun de sakte hain jabki lower-top wale dete hain?
Equal degrees ke saath leading terms dono se divide karne ke baad survive karte hain, aur ratio bachta hai; ek chhote top ke saath, har surviving term mein ki negative power hoti hai jo vanish ho jaati hai, aur milta hai.
WQ6. Ek "hole" asymptote ki tarah kyun nahi dikhta haalaanki formula wahaan undefined hai?
Common factor cancel karne ke baad limit ek finite number hoti hai; agar hum us single point ko fill kar dein toh graph perfectly smooth hoga, isliye height kabhi explode nahi hoti.
WQ7. kyun hai, nahi?
Square root symbol nonnegative root return karta hai; agar negative hai, toh khud negative hai aur woh output nahi ho sakta, isliye nonnegative result guarantee karne ke liye zaroori hai.
Edge cases
EC1. Kya kisi function mein par vertical asymptote ho sakti hai haalaanki finite hai?
Haan, agar doosri side ho. Ek infinite one-sided limit kaafi hai line ko vertical asymptote banane ke liye.
EC2. kya hai, aur kya yeh left side se match karta hai?
Yeh hai; left side hai. Toh ki do horizontal asymptotes hain, .
EC3. ka kya hota hai aur yeh kaun si asymptote deta hai?
, isliye right par HA hai. (Left par, — wahaan koi HA nahi aur koi finite value nahi.)
EC4. Kya automatically ek hole hai?
Nahi. indeterminate hai: cancel karne ke baad yeh ek finite number de sakta hai (hole), ya ek leftover factor phir bhi tak blow up ho sakta hai (asymptote), jaise .
EC5. Agar aur (same ) ho, toh kitni horizontal asymptotes hain?
Sirf ek line, ; ek hi value share karne wali do limits ek single asymptote describe karti hain jise dono ends se approach kiya jaata hai.
EC6. Kya ek polynomial (jaise ) ki koi horizontal asymptote ho sakti hai?
Nahi. Ek non-constant polynomial ke saath tak bhaag jaata hai, isliye yeh kabhi kisi finite par settle nahi hota — koi horizontal asymptote nahi (aur koi vertical bhi nahi).
EC7. Degenerate case: constant function ki asymptotes kya hain?
Horizontal asymptote (trivially, dono taraf ki limit hai), aur koi vertical asymptote nahi kyunki yeh kabhi blow up nahi karti.
Connections
- Infinite limits and limits at infinity — vertical - horizontal asymptotes
- Limits — formal epsilon-delta definition
- One-sided limits
- Continuity and removable discontinuities
- Curve sketching using first and second derivatives
- Slant (oblique) asymptotes via polynomial division
- L'Hôpital's rule for indeterminate forms