4.1.3 · D3 · Maths › Calculus I — Limits & Derivatives › One-sided limits — left-hand, right-hand
Intuition Ye page kis liye hai
Parent note ne tumhe rule diya tha. Ye page har woh situation dhundh ke laata hai jo ek one-sided-limit problem mein aa sakti hai, aur unme se ek-ek ka example karta hai. Yahan koi nayi theory nahi hai — ye sirf cases ka ek tour hai. Jab tum ye finish karo, toh koi bhi exam version tumhe surprise nahi karega, kyunki tum uski "shape" pehle se dekh chuke hoge.
Har example ko kaise padho: pehle answer cover karo aur ek Forecast banao (ek guess). Phir numbered steps walk karo — har ek batata hai ki hum ne ye kyun kiya . Phir Verify karo — plug back karke ya sanity-check karke.
Har one-sided-limit question actually kuch gine-chune shapes mein se ek hoti hai. Yahan poori list hai, aur konsa example konse ko handle karta hai.
Cell
Case class
Mushkil kya hai
Example
A
Sides agree (piecewise)
dono rules check karne padte hain
Ex 1
B
Sides disagree, both finite (jump)
equal-existence trap
Ex 2
C
Domain edge — ek side undefined
sirf EK side exist karti hai
Ex 3
D
Pole / infinite — sides ± ∞ jaate hain
denominator ka sign
Ex 4
E
Floor / step , tricky non-integer twist
floor sirf integers par jump karta hai
Ex 5
F
0/0 removable — pehle algebra zaroori
seedha plug in nahi kar sakte
Ex 6
G
Squeeze at a wiggle (sin x 1 type)
bounded-times-small
Ex 7
H
Word problem (price/tax jump)
story ko piecewise mein translate karo
Ex 8
I
Exam twist — unknown constant ke liye solve karo
sides ko match karne par majboor karo
Ex 9
Hum pehle vocabulary zero se banate hain, phir A→I march karte hain.
Definition Teen symbols jinhe hum use karte rahenge
x → a + ka matlab hai "x number a ki taraf slide karta hai lekin a se bada rehta hai" — socho a = 2 aur x = 2.1 , 2.01 , 2.001 , … Chota raised + ek direction label hai, compute karne wala plus-sign nahi.
x → a − ka matlab hai "x , a ki taraf chhota rehte hue slide karta hai" — x = 1.9 , 1.99 , …
⌊ x ⌋ hai greatest integer ≤ x — tum nearest whole number tak neeche round karte ho. ⌊ 3.7 ⌋ = 3 , ⌊ 3 ⌋ = 3 , ⌊ − 0.2 ⌋ = − 1 . (Aur detail Greatest integer / floor function mein hai.)
Woh ek law jo hum baar baar use karte hain:
lim x → a f ( x ) = L ⟺ lim x → a − f ( x ) = lim x → a + f ( x ) = L .
Dono sides exist bhi karni chahiye aur equal bhi honi chahiye. Agar koi bhi fail ho, toh two-sided limit exist nahi karti.
Upar ki figure hamaara map hai: ek single number line jisme a marked hai. Coral arrow right se creep karta hai (a + ), lavender arrow left se (a − ). Neeche ka har example bas itna hai: "har arrow ki function kis value ki taraf ja rahi hai?"
Worked example Ex 1 · Do rules jo meet karte hain
f ( x ) = { 2 x + 1 x 2 + 2 x ≤ 1 x > 1
lim x → 1 − f , lim x → 1 + f nikalo, aur two-sided limit decide karo.
Forecast: x = 1 par left rule 3 deta hai; right rule deta hai 1 + 2 = 3 . Guess: match karte hain, limit = 3 .
Left side: x < 1 ke liye hum 2 x + 1 use karte hain. x → 1 − push karo: 2 ( 1 ) + 1 = 3 .
Ye step kyun? 1 ke left mein, sirf rule 2 x + 1 "active" hai, aur ye ek seedhi line hai — substitute karna safe hai.
Right side: x > 1 ke liye hum x 2 + 2 use karte hain. x → 1 + push karo: 1 2 + 2 = 3 .
Ye step kyun? Right mein, active rule x 2 + 2 par switch ho jaata hai; ye bhi ek polynomial hai, isliye substitution legal hai.
Combine karo: dono sides 3 deti hain, equal hain, toh law se lim x → 1 f = 3 .
Verify: near-points test karo. f ( 0.99 ) = 2 ( 0.99 ) + 1 = 2.98 ≈ 3 ✓. f ( 1.01 ) = ( 1.01 ) 2 + 2 = 3.0201 ≈ 3 ✓. Dono 3 ke paas hain.
Worked example Ex 2 · Classic sign-jump
s ( x ) = x − 4 ∣ x − 4∣ , x = 4. Find both one-sided limits at 4.
Forecast: absolute value divided by wahi cheez — ye ek "+ 1 / − 1 " splitter hai. Guess: right = + 1 , left = − 1 , koi two-sided limit nahi.
Right side (x > 4 ): tab x − 4 > 0 , toh ∣ x − 4∣ = x − 4 . Ratio = x − 4 x − 4 = 1 .
Ye step kyun? Absolute value ki definition : ek positive quantity ke liye, ∣ u ∣ = u . Yahan u = x − 4 positive hai jab x > 4 .
Toh lim x → 4 + s = 1 .
Left side (x < 4 ): tab x − 4 < 0 , toh ∣ x − 4∣ = − ( x − 4 ) . Ratio = x − 4 − ( x − 4 ) = − 1 .
Ye step kyun? Ek negative quantity ke liye, ∣ u ∣ = − u (sign flip karo taaki positive ho jaye).
Toh lim x → 4 − s = − 1 . Kyunki 1 = − 1 , two-sided limit exist nahi karti — size 2 ka ek jump hai.
Verify: s ( 4.5 ) = 0.5 ∣0.5∣ = 1 ✓ aur s ( 3.5 ) = − 0.5 ∣ − 0.5∣ = − 0.5 0.5 = − 1 ✓.
Common mistake "Dono sides exist karti hain (
± 1 ), toh limit exist karti hai."
Fix: har side par existence sirf law ka aadha hissa hai — unhe equal bhi hona chahiye. Yahan hain nahi. Ye ek jump discontinuity hai.
Worked example Ex 3 · Ek square-root ki deewar
r ( x ) = x − 2 ki one-sided limits x = 2 par nikalo.
Forecast: tum negative real ka square root nahi le sakte. Toh left side ke paas khadne ki jagah nahi hai. Guess: sirf right limit exist karti hai, aur wo 0 hai.
Pehle domain check karo. x − 2 real tabhi hai jab x − 2 ≥ 0 , yaani x ≥ 2 .
Ye step kyun? Ek limit tabhi "approach" kar sakti hai jab function defined ho. Left par koi domain nahi = koi left-hand limit nahi.
Right side (x > 2 ): jaise x → 2 + , x − 2 → 0 + , toh x − 2 → 0 . Is liye lim x → 2 + r = 0 .
Left side (x < 2 ): function undefined hai; lim x → 2 − r exist nahi karta (koi domain nahi).
Two-sided: exist nahi karta, kyunki ek side missing hai — lekin ek khaas wajah se: ye ek domain edge hai, mismatch nahi.
Verify: r ( 2.01 ) = 0.01 = 0.1 , aur r ( 2.0001 ) = 0.0001 = 0.01 — 0 ki taraf shrink ho raha hai ✓. r ( 1.9 ) = − 0.1 real number nahi hai ✓.
Worked example Ex 4 · Sides opposite directions mein blow up hoti hain
p ( x ) = x − 5 1 ki one-sided limits x = 5 par nikalo.
Forecast: tiny denominator = huge output; denominator ka sign decide karta hai upar ya neeche. Guess: right → + ∞ , left → − ∞ .
Right side (x > 5 ): x − 5 ek tiny positive number hai, jaise 0.001 . Tab 0.001 1 = 1000 , bina bound ke badhta hai. Toh lim x → 5 + p = + ∞ .
Ye step kyun? 1 ko ek shrinking positive number se divide karna arbitrarily large aur positive ho jaata hai.
Left side (x < 5 ): x − 5 ek tiny negative number hai, jaise − 0.001 . Tab − 0.001 1 = − 1000 . Toh lim x → 5 − p = − ∞ .
Two-sided: exist nahi karta — sides opposite infinities ki taraf diverge karti hain. Ye x = 5 par ek vertical asymptote hai.
Verify: p ( 5.001 ) = 0.001 1 = 1000 > 0 ✓, p ( 4.999 ) = − 0.001 1 = − 1000 < 0 ✓.
lim x → 5 + p = + ∞ , toh ye one-sided limit exist karti hai ."
Fix: + ∞ ek real number nahi hai. Hum kehte hain limit + ∞ ki taraf diverge karti hai — ye runaway behaviour describe karta hai, lekin ye ek non-existent (infinite) limit count hoti hai.
Worked example Ex 5 · Floor jahan approach point integer NAHI hai
⌊ 2 x ⌋ ki dono one-sided limits x = 1.5 par nikalo.
Forecast: floor tabhi jump karta hai jab uska input integer hit kare. Input hai 2 x ; x = 1.5 par wo hai 2 ( 1.5 ) = 3 , ek integer — toh yahan jump hoga . Guess: left = 2 , right = 3 .
Pata karo kahan andar integer hai. 2 x = 3 exactly x = 1.5 par hai. Toh floor ka "step" bilkul hamare point par land karta hai.
Ye step kyun? ⌊ ⋅ ⌋ integers ke beech constant hota hai aur unpar jump karta hai; hume check karna hoga ki 2 x , x = 1.5 par integer cross karta hai ya nahi. Karta hai.
Left side (x < 1.5 ): maano x = 1.49 , tab 2 x = 2.98 , aur ⌊ 2.98 ⌋ = 2 . Toh lim x → 1. 5 − ⌊ 2 x ⌋ = 2 .
Ye step kyun? 1.5 ke thoda neeche, 2 x 3 se thoda neeche hai, toh wo 2 tak floor down karta hai.
Right side (x > 1.5 ): maano x = 1.51 , tab 2 x = 3.02 , aur ⌊ 3.02 ⌋ = 3 . Toh lim x → 1. 5 + ⌊ 2 x ⌋ = 3 .
Two-sided: 2 = 3 , toh exist nahi karta — 1 ka ek jump.
Verify: ⌊ 2 ( 1.499 )⌋ = ⌊ 2.998 ⌋ = 2 ✓ aur ⌊ 2 ( 1.501 )⌋ = ⌊ 3.002 ⌋ = 3 ✓.
Worked example Ex 6 · Seedha plug in nahi kar sakte
q ( x ) = x − 3 x 2 − 9 ka lim x → 3 − aur lim x → 3 + nikalo.
Forecast: x = 3 par hume 0 0 milega — undefined, toh plug karna illegal hai. Lekin ye factor hota hai. Guess: dono sides 6 deti hain; limit exist karti hai = 6 .
Diagnose karo. Direct substitution deta hai 3 − 3 3 2 − 9 = 0 0 , ek indeterminate form — abhi koi information nahi.
Ye step kyun? 0 0 ka matlab hai "read nahi kar sakte"; limit lene se pehle simplify karna zaroori hai.
Top factor karo. x 2 − 9 = ( x − 3 ) ( x + 3 ) (difference of squares). Toh q ( x ) = x − 3 ( x − 3 ) ( x + 3 ) = x + 3 for x = 3 .
Ye step kyun? Common ( x − 3 ) cancel karna mushkil hatata hai; valid hai kyunki limit ke paas x = 3 hota hai (hum x = 3 ko kabhi touch nahi karte).
Ab dono sides x + 3 use karti hain. Left: x → 3 − , x + 3 → 6 . Right: x → 3 + , x + 3 → 6 .
Dono 6 deti hain, equal hain, toh lim x → 3 q = 6 . (x = 3 par hole removable hai.)
Verify: q ( 2.99 ) = 2.99 − 3 2.9 9 2 − 9 = − 0.01 − 0.0599 = 5.99 ✓ aur q ( 3.01 ) = 0.01 3.0 1 2 − 9 = 6.01 ✓.
Worked example Ex 7 · Infinite oscillation, kabu mein
w ( x ) = x sin ( x 1 ) ka lim x → 0 + aur lim x → 0 − nikalo.
Forecast: sin ( 1/ x ) , 0 ke paas pagal tarah oscillate karta hai, lekin x shrink ho kar 0 hota hai. Ek chota number times ek bounded number → 0 . Guess: dono sides = 0 .
Wiggle ko bound karo. Har x = 0 ke liye, − 1 ≤ sin ( 1/ x ) ≤ 1 .
Ye step kyun? sin kisi bhi cheez ka [ − 1 , 1 ] ke andar rehta hai; hume nahi pata kahan hai, bas itna ki bounded hai.
∣ x ∣ se multiply karo. Tab − ∣ x ∣ ≤ x sin ( 1/ x ) ≤ ∣ x ∣ .
Ye step kyun? Bound ko ∣ x ∣ se multiply karna w ( x ) ko do cheezon ke beech trap karta hai jo dono 0 ki taraf jaati hain — squeeze .
Dono bounds → 0. Jaise x → 0 kisi bhi side se, ∣ x ∣ → 0 aur − ∣ x ∣ → 0 , toh w ( x ) squeeze hokar 0 ho jaata hai.
Is liye lim x → 0 − w = lim x → 0 + w = 0 , aur two-sided limit 0 hai — chahe w infinitely baar oscillate kare.
Verify: w ( 0.01 ) = 0.01 sin ( 100 ) ≈ 0.01 ( − 0.506 ) = − 0.00506 , tiny ✓. w ( − 0.01 ) = − 0.01 sin ( − 100 ) ≈ − 0.00506 , bhi tiny ✓. Dono 0 ke paas.
Worked example Ex 8 · Parking-garage price jump
Ek garage $3 per hour charge karta hai, lekin jaise hi tum 2 hours cross karte ho, poore session ke liye flat $8 bill hota hai jo 4 hours tak valid hai. Cost C ( t ) model karo aur t = 2 hours par one-sided limits nikalo.
Forecast: 2 hours se neeche cost 3\times2=\ 6k i t a r a f ba d h t ihai ; 2 hours par/baad ye \ 8 par jump karti hai. Guess: left = 6 , right = 8 , koi two-sided limit nahi — customer ko ek price cliff dikhti hai.
Piecewise rule mein translate karo.
C ( t ) = { 3 t 8 0 ≤ t < 2 2 ≤ t ≤ 4
Ye step kyun? "Per-hour up to 2h" line 3 t hai; "2h cross karne ke baad flat 8" ek constant hai.
Left side (t → 2 − ): 3 t use karo: 3 ( 2 ) = 6 . Toh \lim_{t\to2^-}C=\ 6. ∗ Y es t e p k y u n ? ∗ 2$ hours se thoda neeche tum abhi bhi per-hour meter par ho.
Right side (t → 2 + ): 8 use karo: constant hai, toh \lim_{t\to2^+}C=\ 8$.
Interpret karo: 6 = 8 , koi two-sided limit nahi — ek asal jump discontinuity $2 ki. Wo extra $2 hi 2-hour line cross karne ki "penalty" hai.
Verify (units $): C ( 1.99 ) = 3 ( 1.99 ) = 5.97 ≈ 6 ✓; C ( 2.01 ) = 8 ✓. Prices forecast ke anusaar behave karti hain.
Worked example Ex 9 · Pieces ko milaao
f ( x ) = { k x + 2 x 2 + k x < 1 x ≥ 1
Kis value of k ke liye lim x → 1 f ( x ) exist karta hai? (Ye Continuity at a point se connect hota hai.)
Forecast: two-sided limit tabhi exist karti hai jab sides match karein; unhe equal set karo aur k ke liye solve karo. Guess: k ki ek clean value.
Left side (x → 1 − ): rule k x + 2 deta hai k ( 1 ) + 2 = k + 2 .
Ye step kyun? 1 ke neeche active rule line k x + 2 hai; approached value 1 substitute karo.
Right side (x → 1 + ): rule x 2 + k deta hai 1 + k .
Equality force karo (law). Two-sided limit exist karne ke liye:
k + 2 = 1 + k ⟹ 2 = 1.
Ye step kyun? Humne demand ki ki sides match karein; lekin 2 = 1 har k ke liye galat hai.
Conclusion: koi bhi aisi k ki value nahi hai jo limit ko exist karaye — constant terms chahe kuch bhi ho, clash karte hain. (Ek sneaky exam trap: jis unknown ke liye solve kar rahe ho wo cancel ho jaata hai.)
Verify: dono expressions subtract karo: ( k + 2 ) − ( 1 + k ) = 1 = 0 , k se independent hai ✓. Sides hamesha exactly 1 se alag rehti hain.
Common mistake "Sides equal set karo,
k = … milega, done."
Fix: hamesha check karo ki tumhara equation solvable hai ya nahi. Yahan k 's cancel ho jaate hain aur tum ek false statement ke saath reh jaate ho — honest answer hai "aisa koi k nahi."
Recall Konsa example kis shape ke liye tha?
A agree ::: Ex 1 (limit = 3 )
B jump ::: Ex 2 (+ 1 vs − 1 )
C domain edge ::: Ex 3 (right = 0 , left undefined)
D pole ::: Ex 4 (+ ∞ vs − ∞ )
E floor twist ::: Ex 5 (2 vs 3 )
F removable 0/0 ::: Ex 6 (dono = 6 )
G squeeze wiggle ::: Ex 7 (dono = 0 )
H word problem ::: Ex 8 ($6 vs $8)
I unknown constant ::: Ex 9 (koi k kaam nahi karta)
Mnemonic Kisi bhi one-sided problem ke liye scan order
"DEFAULT DAP" — D omain check karo, phir E valuate karo har side, phir F orm-check (0/0 ? ∞ ?), A lign (kya equal hain?), P ronounce the verdict.
One-sided Limits — Left-hand & Right-hand (parent)
Limit of a function — intuitive & ε-δ definition
Continuity at a point
Jump, removable & infinite discontinuities
Vertical asymptotes
Greatest integer / floor function
Differentiability — left & right derivatives
Form check zero over zero or infinity