Intuition What this page is
The parent note gave you the machinery: the equation a 2 x 2 − b 2 y 2 = 1 , the focus rule c 2 = a 2 + b 2 , eccentricity e = c / a , and asymptotes y = ± a b x . This page hunts down every kind of question those tools can be asked and works one of each — including the awkward corners: a hyperbola whose transverse axis points up , a degenerate hyperbola that collapses to two crossing lines, both limiting cases as the shape flattens or fans out, a real-world word problem , and an exam twist where the numbers are hidden.
If you have not met the symbols a , b , c , e yet, read the parent first: the parent topic builds them from zero.
Before the examples, let us earn the one formula that every angle/limit problem leans on. Look at the picture: the central box has half-width a and half-height b ; the focus sits at distance c from the centre.
Why this is the useful form: the asymptote slope is b / a . So the tilt of the box diagonal alone fixes e — you never need a and b separately (Example 3 and Example 6 both cash this in). Geometrically, c is the hypotenuse of the right triangle with legs a (along the x -axis) and b (up to the box corner); the amber line in the figure is exactly that hypotenuse.
Every hyperbola question is one of these cells. The last column names the example that covers it.
#
Case class
What makes it different
Covered by
A
Transverse axis on x (horizontal)
+ sign on x 2 ; foci ( ± c , 0 ) ; slope b / a
Ex 1
B
Transverse axis on y (vertical)
+ sign on y 2 ; foci ( 0 , ± c ) ; slope a / b
Ex 2
C
Build equation from foci + 2 a
reverse direction: data → equation
Ex 2
D
Info given as an angle (asymptote tilt)
need tan , then e = 1 + ( b / a ) 2
Ex 3
E
Degenerate input (RHS = 0 )
curve collapses to the two asymptotes
Ex 4
F1
Limiting behaviour b → 0 +
branches pinch onto the x -axis, e → 1 +
Ex 5
F2
Limiting behaviour b → ∞
branches fan toward vertical, e → ∞
Ex 6
G
Rectangular case a = b
perpendicular asymptotes, e = 2
Ex 7
H
Word problem (LORAN / navigation)
constant time-difference → constant distance-difference
Ex 8
I
Exam twist — numbers hidden, must solve for a , b
given e and a focus, find equation
Ex 9
Recall Quick self-test before you start
Which sign relation is a hyperbola's? ::: c 2 = a 2 + b 2 (plus — foci sit outside the vertices)
Slope of asymptote when transverse axis is horizontal ::: ± b / a
Slope of asymptote when transverse axis is vertical ::: ± a / b
Worked example Example 1 — Case A: horizontal transverse axis, full read-off
Analyse 9 x 2 − 16 y 2 = 1 : find vertices, foci, e , asymptotes.
Forecast: The + sign is on x 2 , so guess the branches open left–right and the foci sit on the x -axis. Will e be closer to 1 or large? Since b ( = 4 ) > a ( = 3 ) , the box is tall, so the branches should be wide — guess e noticeably bigger than 1 .
Read a 2 = 9 ⇒ a = 3 . Why this step? The term carrying the + sign names the transverse (foci) direction; its denominator is a 2 . So vertices are ( ± 3 , 0 ) .
Read b 2 = 16 ⇒ b = 4 . Why? The other denominator is b 2 ; it fixes the box height, not any vertex.
c 2 = a 2 + b 2 = 9 + 16 = 25 ⇒ c = 5 . Why? Hyperbola uses plus — foci lie beyond the vertices. Foci ( ± 5 , 0 ) .
e = c / a = 5/3 ≈ 1.667 . Why? e = c / a by definition, and > 1 confirms it is a hyperbola.
Asymptotes y = ± a b x = ± 3 4 x . Why? Horizontal transverse ⇒ slope is (box height)/(box width) = b / a .
The figure at the top of the page (blueprint plot of the amber box with corners ( ± 3 , ± 4 ) , cyan curve, and dashed asymptote diagonals) is this hyperbola — reuse it here.
Verify: c 2 should equal a 2 + b 2 : 5 2 = 25 = 9 + 16 . ✓ And e = 5/3 > 1 . ✓ Corner of the box ( 3 , 4 ) has slope 4/3 — matches the asymptote. ✓
Worked example Example 2 — Cases B + C: vertical axis, built from data
The foci are ( 0 , ± 10 ) and the constant distance-difference is 2 a = 16 . Write the equation, then give e and the asymptotes.
Forecast: Foci are on the y -axis, so guess the + sign lands on y 2 and branches open up–down . Since 2 a = 16 is close to 2 c = 20 , the branches should be fairly narrow (e near 1 ).
Foci on y -axis ⇒ vertical form a 2 y 2 − b 2 x 2 = 1 . Why this step? The transverse axis always passes through the foci; here that axis is vertical, so y 2 gets the + .
c = 10 (focus distance) and a = 2 16 = 8 . Why? 2 a is the given difference, so a = 8 ; c is read off the focus.
b 2 = c 2 − a 2 = 100 − 64 = 36 . Why? Rearranged c 2 = a 2 + b 2 ; b is whatever the plus-rule leaves over.
Equation: 64 y 2 − 36 x 2 = 1 . Why? Substitute a 2 = 64 , b 2 = 36 .
e = c / a = 10/8 = 1.25 . Asymptotes y = ± b a x = ± 6 8 x = ± 3 4 x . Why does the slope flip to a / b ? In the vertical form the box is y = ± a , x = ± b , so the diagonal rise is a over run b .
Look at the figure: the branches open up and down , the foci are the amber dots on the y -axis, and the up–down box makes the asymptotes tilt more steeply than a horizontal case would.
Verify: c 2 = a 2 + b 2 : 100 = 64 + 36 . ✓ e = 1.25 > 1 . ✓ Forecast said "narrow, e near 1 " and 1.25 is indeed close to 1 . ✓
Worked example Example 3 — Case D: eccentricity from an angle
A hyperbola with horizontal transverse axis has asymptotes making ± 3 0 ∘ with the x -axis. Find e without knowing a or b separately.
Forecast: Shallow asymptotes (3 0 ∘ ) mean narrow branches, so e should be only slightly above 1 .
Slope = tan 3 0 ∘ = 3 1 . Why tan ? Slope is "rise over run" and on a right triangle with the angle at the origin, tan ( angle ) = adjacent (run) opposite (rise) — exactly the slope. So tan 3 0 ∘ is the asymptote slope.
Set that equal to b / a : a b = 3 1 . Why? For a horizontal hyperbola the asymptote slope is b / a .
e = 1 + ( a b ) 2 = 1 + 3 1 = 3 4 = 3 2 ≈ 1.155 . Why this formula? The section above derived e = 1 + b 2 / a 2 from the plus-rule; it uses only the ratio b / a , which is all the angle gave us — we never needed a , b alone.
Look at the figure: the two dashed asymptotes make a shallow 3 0 ∘ wedge with the x -axis, and the amber angle arc marks tan 3 0 ∘ as the slope.
Verify: ( 3 1 ) 2 = 3 1 ; 1 + 3 1 = 3 4 ; 4/3 ≈ 1.1547 > 1 . ✓ Small angle ⇒ e just above 1 , as forecast. ✓
Worked example Example 4 — Case E: degenerate hyperbola (RHS = 0)
Describe the full graph of 9 x 2 − 16 y 2 = 0 (note the 0 , not 1 ).
Forecast: With no "1 " to keep the curve away from the centre, guess the "hyperbola" shrinks onto its own asymptotes — a pair of crossing straight lines.
Factor as a difference of squares: ( 3 x − 4 y ) ( 3 x + 4 y ) = 0 . Why this step? Anything of the form P 2 − Q 2 factors into ( P − Q ) ( P + Q ) ; a product is zero only when a factor is zero.
So 3 x = 4 y or 3 x = − 4 y , i.e. y = ± 3 4 x . Why? Setting each factor to zero gives the two lines.
These are exactly the asymptotes of Example 1. Why does this happen? Replacing the 1 by 0 is the same "drop the 1 " limit that the parent used to find asymptotes — here it is exact, so the graph is the asymptote pair.
Look at the figure: the two cyan lines cross at the origin; there is no gap, no branch — a fully degenerate conic.
Verify: Point ( 3 , 4 ) : 9 9 − 16 16 = 1 − 1 = 0 . ✓ Point ( 3 , − 4 ) : also 0 . ✓ Both lie on y = ± 3 4 x . See also Asymptotes and Limits at Infinity for why "1 → 0 " is the natural limit.
Worked example Example 5 — Case F1: limiting behaviour
b → 0 + (branches pinch)
Fix a = 2 . Watch 4 x 2 − b 2 y 2 = 1 as b → 0 + . What happens to the branches and to e ?
Forecast: Tiny b means a very short box; guess the branches squeeze down toward the x -axis and e → 1 + (nearly straight rays).
Asymptote slope = b / a = b /2 → 0 . Why this step? As b → 0 the box height vanishes, so its diagonals flatten toward the horizontal.
e = 1 + b 2 / a 2 = 1 + b 2 /4 → 1 = 1 + . Why? With b 2 → 0 the term under the root → 1 ; e approaches 1 from above but never reaches it.
The curve y 2 = b 2 ( 4 x 2 − 1 ) → 0 for every fixed x , so both branches collapse onto the two rays x ≥ 2 and x ≤ − 2 of the x -axis. Why? Multiplying a bounded bracket by b 2 → 0 forces y → 0 .
Look at the figure: as b shrinks the cyan branches flatten toward the x -axis and the box collapses to a thin sliver.
Verify: At b = 0.1 : slope = 0.05 , e = 1 + 0.0025 ≈ 1.00125 — both tiny excesses above their limits, confirming the 1 + approach. ✓
Worked example Example 6 — Case F2: limiting behaviour
b → ∞ (branches fan out)
Fix a = 2 again. Now watch 4 x 2 − b 2 y 2 = 1 as b → ∞ . What happens to the branches and to e ?
Forecast: A very tall box should make the asymptotes almost vertical and e blow up — the opposite of Example 5.
Asymptote slope = b / a = b /2 → ∞ . Why this step? A huge box height makes the diagonals nearly vertical (steep slope).
e = 1 + b 2 / a 2 = 1 + b 2 /4 → ∞ . Why? With b 2 → ∞ the term under the root grows without bound, so e grows without bound.
Near the vertices ( ± 2 , 0 ) the curve turns sharply and then rises almost vertically alongside the steep asymptotes. Why? For large b , y = ± 2 b x 1 − 4/ x 2 climbs very fast once ∣ x ∣ passes 2 , so the branches hug near-vertical lines.
Look at the figure: the tall amber box drives the dashed asymptotes toward vertical, and the cyan branches fan open far wider than in Example 5.
Verify: At b = 20 : slope = 10 , e = 1 + 100 = 101 ≈ 10.05 — large, as forecast. ✓ Together with Example 5 this brackets the whole range 1 < e < ∞ . ✓
Worked example Example 7 — Case G: rectangular hyperbola
a = b
Show 25 x 2 − 25 y 2 = 1 is rectangular, and find its e and asymptote angle.
Forecast: Equal denominators ⇒ a = b ⇒ guess perpendicular (9 0 ∘ apart) asymptotes and the signature e = 2 .
a 2 = b 2 = 25 ⇒ a = b = 5 . Why this step? Equal denominators force a = b , the definition of a rectangular hyperbola.
Asymptotes y = ± a b x = ± x , i.e. at ± 4 5 ∘ . Why? Slope b / a = 1 , and tan 4 5 ∘ = 1 ; the two lines meet at 9 0 ∘ .
e = 1 + b 2 / a 2 = 1 + 1 = 2 ≈ 1.414 . Why? Ratio b / a = 1 plugged into e = 1 + ( b / a ) 2 .
Look at the figure: the box is a perfect square , so its diagonals are exactly perpendicular.
Verify: e = 2 ≈ 1.41421 > 1 . ✓ Asymptote slopes + 1 and − 1 multiply to − 1 , the perpendicularity test. ✓ Rotating 4 5 ∘ turns this into an x y = k form — see Rectangular Hyperbola xy=c^2 .
Worked example Example 8 — Case H: word problem (LORAN navigation)
Two radio beacons F 1 and F 2 stand 200 km apart on an east–west line. A ship measures that its signal timing gives P F 1 − P F 2 = 120 km (constant). On which curve does the ship lie? Give its equation with the beacons' midpoint as origin.
Forecast: "Constant difference of distances to two fixed points" is the very definition of a hyperbola, so the ship's position curve should be one branch — and since P F 1 > P F 2 the ship is closer to F 2 .
Place origin at the midpoint, beacons at F 1 ( − 100 , 0 ) , F 2 ( 100 , 0 ) (km). Why this step? Symmetric placement puts the centre at the origin and gives the standard form.
2 c = 200 ⇒ c = 100 . Why? 2 c is the focal separation, exactly the beacon distance.
2 a = 120 ⇒ a = 60 . Why? 2 a is the fixed distance-difference in the locus definition ∣ P F 1 − P F 2 ∣ = 2 a .
b 2 = c 2 − a 2 = 10 0 2 − 6 0 2 = 10000 − 3600 = 6400 . Why? Rearranged plus-rule c 2 = a 2 + b 2 .
Equation 3600 x 2 − 6400 y 2 = 1 ; the ship is on the branch with x > 0 . Why that branch? P F 1 − P F 2 = + 120 > 0 means the ship is farther from F 1 , hence closer to F 2 ( 100 , 0 ) , so it lies on the right branch x > 0 .
Look at the figure: the two amber beacons sit on the x -axis, and the highlighted cyan right branch is where every "F 1 is 120 km farther" position lives.
Verify: a < c (60<100) as required for a real hyperbola. ✓ b 2 = 6400 > 0 . ✓ e = c / a = 100/60 = 5/3 ≈ 1.667 > 1 . ✓ Units: all lengths in km, ratios dimensionless. ✓ This is exactly the LORAN principle: constant time -difference × light-speed = constant distance -difference.
Worked example Example 9 — Case I: exam twist, numbers hidden
A hyperbola with horizontal transverse axis has eccentricity e = 5 13 and one focus at ( 13 , 0 ) . Find a , b , and the equation.
Forecast: The focus gives c = 13 ; with e = 13/5 the number 5 smells like a . Guess a = 5 , then b from the plus-rule.
c = 13 (focus is at distance c on the x -axis). Why this step? For a horizontal hyperbola centred at the origin, foci are ( ± c , 0 ) .
e = c / a ⇒ a = c / e = 13 ÷ 5 13 = 5 . Why? Invert e = c / a ; this recovers the hidden a .
b 2 = c 2 − a 2 = 169 − 25 = 144 ⇒ b = 12 . Why? Plus-rule again, solving for b .
Equation 25 x 2 − 144 y 2 = 1 ; asymptotes y = ± 5 12 x . Why? Substitute a 2 = 25 , b 2 = 144 ; slope = b / a = 12/5 .
Look at the figure: the amber right triangle with legs a = 5 , b = 12 and hypotenuse c = 13 shows the whole ( 5 , 12 , 13 ) Pythagorean triple that the exam hid inside the numbers.
Verify: c 2 = a 2 + b 2 : 169 = 25 + 144 . ✓ e = c / a = 13/5 = 2.6 > 1 . ✓ ( 5 , 12 , 13 ) is a Pythagorean triple, a classic exam-friendly hint. ✓
Mnemonic The read-off ritual (works for every cell)
P–S–P–E–A: P osition of foci (which axis has the + ?) → S olve a from the + -term → P lus-rule c 2 = a 2 + b 2 for the missing length → E ccentricity c / a (must exceed 1 ) → A symptote slope (b / a if horizontal, a / b if vertical). Remember that the "E" step also equals 1 + ( b / a ) 2 — the same plus-rule, just divided by a 2 .
Recall One-line summary of the matrix
Every hyperbola task reduces to: identify the transverse axis, then run P–S–P–E–A ; degenerate = RHS 0 , limiting = push b → 0 (pinch) or b → ∞ (fan), rectangular = a = b . ::: All ten cells are the same five-step ritual applied to different givens.
Related building blocks: Eccentricity — unified conic definition , Ellipse — standard forms, foci, eccentricity (contrast the minus-rule), Parabola — standard forms, focus, directrix (the e = 1 boundary), and Conic Sections from a Double Cone for where all this geometry is born.