Worked examples — Pascal's triangle — combinatorial interpretation
This page is a drill through every kind of counting question Pascal's triangle can throw at you. We start by mapping out all the case-classes in one table, then work an example for each cell. If you have not yet met (read " choose "), the count of ways to choose things from things, read the parent note first — here we assume you know it means a count and we push it into every corner.
For the whole page we keep this reference triangle in view:
Row 0: 1
Row 1: 1 1
Row 2: 1 2 1
Row 3: 1 3 3 1
Row 4: 1 4 6 4 1
Row 5: 1 5 10 10 5 1
Row 6: 1 6 15 20 15 6 1
The scenario matrix
Every problem below is one cell in this grid. The point of the grid is: you will never meet a Pascal-triangle situation that isn't one of these rows.
| Cell | Case class | What makes it tricky | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | Ordinary interior entry | pick a middle number cleanly | Ex 1 |
| B | Edge / degenerate or | "choose nothing" or "choose all" — is that or ? | Ex 2 |
| C | Out-of-range or | asks for the impossible | Ex 2 |
| D | Symmetry short-cut | when is big, flip it | Ex 3 |
| E | Build a row by Pascal's rule (no factorials) | add the two parents | Ex 4 |
| F | Row sum (all subsets) | "any number, including none" | Ex 5 |
| G | Alternating sum (even vs odd) | signs flip; must handle separately | Ex 6 |
| H | Real-world word problem | translate English → | Ex 7 |
| I | Exam twist (Hockey Stick diagonal) | a diagonal sum in disguise | Ex 8 |
| J | Limiting / growth behaviour | which entry is biggest? how fast do rows grow? | Ex 9 |
Ex 1 — Cell A: an ordinary interior entry
Forecast: guess before reading — is it single digits or does it break into the teens? Write your guess.
- Read it off the triangle. Row 6 is . Counting positions from , position is . Why this step? The triangle is a lookup table of , so for small reading beats computing.
- Compute from the formula. . Why this step? = (number of ordered pairs ) divided by the orderings of each pair, because a set was counted as both and .
Verify: the two methods give the same . Sanity: it must be a whole number (you can't choose "half a way"), and (unordered ordered), both true.
Ex 2 — Cells B & C: degenerate and impossible inputs
Forecast: two of these are , two are . Which is which?
- — choose nothing. There is exactly one way to pick no items: the empty selection. So . Why this step? "How many ways to do nothing?" has one answer — do nothing. Formula agrees: since .
- — choose all. There is exactly one way to take everything: take everything. So . Why this step? By symmetry — "leave nothing" = "take nothing's mirror".
- — choose items. You cannot select a negative number of things. There are zero such selections: . Why this step? must satisfy ; outside that range the count is defined as (nothing to count).
- — choose 7 from 5. You only have items, so you can't grab . Zero ways: . Why this step? Same range rule from the other side: is impossible.
Verify: (the two outer s bordering every row of the triangle), and out-of-range entries are the invisible s sitting just outside each row that make Pascal's rule work at the edges.
Ex 3 — Cell D: symmetry short-cut
Forecast: will the answer be huge or small? (Hint: is close to .)
- Flip using symmetry. . Why this step? Choosing which to take is the same act as choosing which to leave — same choices, same count. Flipping turns a long product into a short one.
- Compute the easy side. . Why this step? Ordered pairs , divided by the orderings of each pair.
Verify: . Sanity: leaving out of — there are clearly pairs to leave out, and the symmetry guarantees equality.
Ex 4 — Cell E: build a row with Pascal's rule (no factorials)
Forecast: row 7 will have how many entries — or ?
Look at the figure: each new entry drops down from the sum of the two entries directly above it.

- The borders are always . (one way to choose none / all). Why this step? Every row starts and ends with ; these come from the invisible outer .
- Add adjacent parents. ; ; ; ; ; . Why this step? Pascal's rule : a size- subset of either uses element (choose more from ) or doesn't (choose from ). Disjoint + exhaustive → add.
- Assemble. Row 7 .
Verify: the row is a palindrome () as symmetry demands, and it has entries. Cross-check one by formula: . ✓
Ex 5 — Cell F: row sum (all subsets)
Forecast: guess an order of magnitude — dozens? hundreds?
- Translate to subsets. A sandwich is a choice of which fillings are in. Each of the fillings is independently in or out. Why this step? "Any number of fillings, including none" is exactly "any subset of the fillings".
- Count by row sum. . Why this step? Summing over all sizes counts subsets of every size; equivalently each filling says yes/no ( choices), giving . Two counts of the same thing must match.
Verify: add row 6 directly: . ✓ And . The "plain" sandwich is the term (the single ), so it is counted.
Ex 6 — Cell G: alternating sum (even vs odd), and the trap
Forecast: part (b) is the trap — is it also ?
- Write the alternating sum for . . Why this step? The flips sign every step, tagging even-sized subsets and odd-sized subsets .
- Add. . Why this step? The pairing cancels — this says #(even subsets) #(odd subsets) each, and .
- Now . The only term is : . The sum is , not . Why this step? The identity holds only for . At the empty set is the only subset and it is even-sized — there is no odd subset to cancel it. Algebra agrees: .
Verify: (part a), and for the value is (part b). The two halves split row 5's evenly, confirming even = odd for .
Ex 7 — Cell H: a real-world word problem
Forecast: you must choose women and men — do you add or multiply the two counts?
- Split the job into independent choices. Choose women from : ways. Choose men from : ways. Why this step? "Exactly women" fixes the split: women men members. The two selections don't interfere.
- Compute each. (row 5, position 2). (row 4, position 2). Why this step? Read straight off the triangle.
- Multiply (Multiplication Principle). committees. Why this step? For each of the women-choices you may pair any of the men-choices — independent stages multiply, they do not add.
Verify: . Sanity: the total committees of any composition would be ; our "exactly 2 women" slice () is under that, as it must be. See Addition and Multiplication Principles for why we multiplied here (independent stages) rather than added (mutually exclusive cases).
Ex 8 — Cell I: the exam twist (Hockey Stick diagonal)
Forecast: guess whether the shortcut answer sits outside the entries you added.
Follow the coloured "hockey stick" in the figure: a straight diagonal of entries plus one turn at the tip.

- Name the parts. The sum is . Why this step? These are read down the ""-diagonal.
- Apply the Hockey Stick Identity. , here , : the sum equals . Why this step? Repeatedly using Pascal's rule collapses the diagonal to the entry one row below and one step in — the "tip" of the hockey stick. See Hockey Stick Identity.
- Read the tip. (from row 7 we built in Ex 4).
Verify: direct addition … wait — recount: , , , . And ? These disagree, so recheck the identity's index. The diagonal sums to only if the terms are giving . ✓ (Our step 1 mislabelled the first term — , not .) Corrected sum .
Why this correction matters: (choose all of ), a degenerate/edge value from Cell B sneaking into a Cell I problem — always start the diagonal at the true top entry.
Ex 9 — Cell J: limiting / growth behaviour
Forecast: is the biggest entry in the middle or near the edge? Does the total double or square?
- Find the peak. Row 6 . The largest is the middle entry . Why this step? Entries rise to the centre then fall (by symmetry ). The central term is the mode of the row.
- Compare row totals. Row 6 sum ; row 5 sum . Why this step? Each new row adds one more element to be "in or out", doubling the number of subsets: .
- State the growth law. Rows grow by a factor of exactly each step, and the peak entry grows too (from to — also doubling here). Why this step? This is the seed of why binomial distributions concentrate near the middle for large .
Verify: peak ; totals , so the row-total ratio is exactly . ✓
Recall Which cell was which?
Ordinary entry ::: Ex 1 (Cell A) "Choose none / all / impossible" ::: Ex 2 (Cells B, C) Flip when it's large ::: Ex 3 (Cell D) Build a row by adding parents ::: Ex 4 (Cell E) "Any number, including none" = ::: Ex 5 (Cell F) Even vs odd subsets, and the exception ::: Ex 6 (Cell G) Word problem: multiply independent stages ::: Ex 7 (Cell H) Diagonal sum = one entry below ::: Ex 8 (Cell I) Biggest entry is the middle; rows double ::: Ex 9 (Cell J)
Connections
- Pascal's Triangle — Combinatorial Interpretation — the parent this page drills.
- Combinations and Permutations — every here is an unordered count.
- Addition and Multiplication Principles — Ex 7's "multiply, don't add".
- Factorials — the and that fix the degenerate cases (Ex 2).
- Binomial Theorem — row sums (Ex 5) and alternating sums (Ex 6) are and .
- Hockey Stick Identity — the diagonal collapse in Ex 8.
- Fibonacci numbers — shallow diagonals give another growth pattern beyond Ex 9.