3.3.11 · D5Sequences & Series
Question bank — Binomial theorem — statement, proof by induction
The theorem, kept next to you the whole time:
True or false — justify
- has terms. ::: False. It has terms: runs from to inclusive, and counting both endpoints gives values.
- The exponents of and in every single term add up to . ::: True. A term is , so the exponents sum to for every — this is the fingerprint of a genuine binomial term.
- In the coefficients read the same forwards and backwards. ::: True. Since (choosing to include = choosing to exclude), the coefficient list is a palindrome, e.g. .
- Every coefficient in the expanded is positive. ::: False. The magnitudes are positive, but the signs alternate because of : e.g. .
- is always a whole number. ::: True. It counts the number of ways to choose objects from — you cannot have a fractional number of choices, so despite the factorial fractions it is always an integer.
- The binomial theorem as stated (finite sum) works for . ::: False. The finite-sum form needs a positive integer so the sum stops at . Non-integer indices give an infinite binomial series valid only for .
- Setting proves . ::: True. The theorem evaluated at gives on the left and on the right — this also equals the total number of subsets of an -element set.
- The theorem is only valid when and are positive numbers. ::: False. The proof uses only algebra (distribution and induction), so may be any real or complex numbers, including negatives and zero.
Spot the error
- " because you cube each part." ::: The error is ignoring the cross terms. Expanding also lets you pick a mix of 's and 's, giving .
- "In the general term is ." ::: The minus sign is missing. The second term is , so it must enter with its sign: , carrying a .
- "The 4th term of uses in ." ::: Off by one. Because starts at , the term index is ; the 4th term has , i.e. use for the -th term.
- "Pascal's rule is ." ::: The two terms must be neighbours, not identical: — an entry equals the sum of the two entries above it in Pascal's Triangle.
- "During the induction step, after substituting the limits stay to ." ::: The limits shift with the substitution. If ran , then runs ; forgetting this loses or duplicates the endpoint terms.
- "The coefficient of in is ." ::: It forgot the powers of the other term. The term is ; the coefficient is , not .
- " has its largest coefficient at the first term." ::: The largest coefficient sits in the middle (or two middle) terms, since grows then shrinks; the ends are the smallest ().
Why questions
- Why is the coefficient of exactly ? ::: Because building that term means grabbing from exactly of the brackets, and the number of ways to choose which brackets is precisely .
- Why does the induction proof need Pascal's rule specifically? ::: After multiplying by and re-indexing, the two sums share the power with coefficient — Pascal's rule is exactly what collapses that into the single coefficient .
- Why do we re-index the second sum with instead of leaving it? ::: To align equal powers: the two sums originally carry different exponents on , and shifting the index makes both read so like terms can be added.
- Why does for ? ::: It is the theorem at , giving ; the positive and negative binomial coefficients exactly cancel in equal-sized batches.
- Why do the powers of decrease while the powers of increase across the terms? ::: In each term the exponents must sum to , so as you grab from one more bracket (raising 's power by ) you grab from one fewer (lowering 's power by ).
- Why can we not just say " is symmetric so is fine"? ::: Symmetry of the coefficients is real, but symmetry does not mean the cross terms vanish — the middle coefficients for are genuinely nonzero.
Edge cases
- What is , and how many terms does it have? ::: It equals — a single term. With the sum has term, namely , matching the convention (see Factorials).
- What does the theorem give when ? ::: Every term with carries a factor and vanishes, leaving only : , exactly as should.
- Is equal to , and why does that make sense? ::: Yes: since ; there is exactly one way to choose nothing (the empty choice), so the first coefficient is always .
- What happens to the general term when exceeds (say )? ::: It does not exist in a positive-integer expansion; for because you cannot choose more brackets than there are, so the sum correctly stops at .
- Does with an even have a symmetric sign pattern? ::: The magnitudes stay palindromic, but signs follow : for even the first and last terms are both positive, while for odd the last term is negative — always check parity of .
- If , do any terms collapse or cancel? ::: Nothing cancels; instead every term becomes , and summing gives , consistent with .
Recall One-line self-test before you leave
Cover and answer: How many terms, what is the sign law, and which lemma drives the proof? Terms ; the sign in is ; the proof is powered by Pascal's rule.
Connections
- Parent: Binomial theorem — statement & proof
- Pascal's Triangle — the palindrome and Pascal's-rule traps live here.
- Combinations — nCr — why is a whole number and why .
- Mathematical Induction — the re-indexing and limit-shift traps.
- General term & middle term of a binomial expansion — the "-th vs -th term" trap.
- Binomial series for any index — the "does it work for ?" edge case.
- Factorials — the convention behind the edge case.