What formula? This is the sum of the first n integers with n=50.
∑k=150k=2n(n+1)=250⋅51=22550=1275.Sanity check (Gauss picture):50 columns each summing to 51 gives 2550, halved is 1275. ✔
Move 1 — linearity. Split into building blocks:
∑k=120(3k2−2k+5)=3∑k=120k2−2∑k=120k+5∑k=1201.Compute each with n=20:∑k2=620⋅21⋅41=2870,∑k=220⋅21=210,∑1=20.Combine:3(2870)−2(210)+5(20)=8610−420+100=8290.
Move 2 — shifting. The formula only knows how to start at k=1, so cut off the missing head k=1,2,3,4:
∑k=512k2=∑k=112k2−∑k=14k2.∑k=112k2=612⋅13⋅25=650,∑k=14k2=64⋅5⋅9=30.650−30=620.Why a−1=4? We want terms 5 through 12 kept, so we subtract everything strictly below 5, i.e. up to 4.
Evaluate k=1∑n(2k−1) (the sum of the first n odd numbers), then read off its value at n=8.
Recall Solution Q6
General form first. Linearity:
∑k=1n(2k−1)=2∑k=1nk−∑k=1n1=2⋅2n(n+1)−n=n(n+1)−n=n2.
So the first n odd numbers sum to n2 — a perfect square.
At n=8:1+3+5+⋯+15=82=64.Picture: stacking 1,3,5,… L-shaped shells (gnomons) grows a square one ring at a time — that's why the total is n2.
Evaluate k=1∑nk(k+1) in closed form, then check at n=6.
Recall Solution Q7
Expand first so each piece is a standard power sum:
k(k+1)=k2+k.∑k=1nk(k+1)=∑k2+∑k=6n(n+1)(2n+1)+2n(n+1).Factor 6n(n+1) out of both:=6n(n+1)[(2n+1)+3]=6n(n+1)(2n+4)=3n(n+1)(n+2).
So k=1∑nk(k+1)=3n(n+1)(n+2).Check n=6: formula gives 36⋅7⋅8=112. Direct: 2+6+12+20+30+42=112. ✔
(These are twice the "tetrahedral numbers" — the 3-D pile-of-oranges count.)
Evaluate k=1∑n(2k−1)2 in closed form, then check at n=5.
Recall Solution Q8
Expand the square:(2k−1)2=4k2−4k+1.∑k=1n(2k−1)2=4∑k2−4∑k+∑1.=4⋅6n(n+1)(2n+1)−4⋅2n(n+1)+n.=32n(n+1)(2n+1)−2n(n+1)+n.Put over 3 and simplify (let me expand the first term's bracket): 2n(n+1)(2n+1)=2n(2n2+3n+1)=4n3+6n2+2n. And 2n(n+1)=2n2+2n, so −2n(n+1)+n=−2n2−n. Then
∑=34n3+6n2+2n−2n2−n=34n3+6n2+2n−6n2−3n=34n3−n=3n(4n2−1).
Factor 4n2−1=(2n−1)(2n+1):
∑k=1n(2k−1)2=3n(2n−1)(2n+1).Check n=5: formula 35⋅9⋅11=165. Direct: 1+9+25+49+81=165. ✔
A sum is written with the wrong counter: j=1∑n(2j+3)3 — but you only know power-sum formulas in k. Re-index / expand to a closed form, then check at n=4.
Recall Solution Q9
Move 3 — the counter's name is irrelevant; expand the cube. Using (a+b)3=a3+3a2b+3ab2+b3 with a=2j,b=3:
(2j+3)3=8j3+3(4j2)(3)+3(2j)(9)+27=8j3+36j2+54j+27.Sum term by term (rename j→k, same thing):∑k=1n(2k+3)3=8∑k3+36∑k2+54∑k+27∑1.=8[2n(n+1)]2+36⋅6n(n+1)(2n+1)+54⋅2n(n+1)+27n.=2n2(n+1)2+6n(n+1)(2n+1)+27n(n+1)+27n.Check n=4 numerically (fastest verification): the terms are j=1,2,3,4⇒(5)3+(7)3+(9)3+(11)3=125+343+729+1331=2528.
Formula at n=4: 2⋅16⋅25+6⋅4⋅5⋅9+27⋅4⋅5+27⋅4=800+1080+540+108=2528. ✔
Prove by the telescoping method that k=1∑nk(k+1)(k+2)=4n(n+1)(n+2)(n+3), then verify at n=5.
Recall Solution Q10
Choose the right f. We want a difference f(k+1)−f(k) equal to k(k+1)(k+2). A product of three consecutive integers is the "difference" of a product of four consecutive integers, scaled. Try
f(k)=41(k−1)k(k+1)(k+2).
Then
f(k+1)−f(k)=41[k(k+1)(k+2)(k+3)−(k−1)k(k+1)(k+2)].
Factor the common k(k+1)(k+2):
=41k(k+1)(k+2)[(k+3)−(k−1)]=41k(k+1)(k+2)⋅4=k(k+1)(k+2).✓Telescope. Summing f(k+1)−f(k) from 1 to n leaves only ends:
∑k=1nk(k+1)(k+2)=f(n+1)−f(1)=41n(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)−41⋅0⋅1⋅2⋅3.
The lower end f(1)=41(0)(1)(2)(3)=0, so
∑k=1nk(k+1)(k+2)=4n(n+1)(n+2)(n+3).Check n=5: formula 45⋅6⋅7⋅8=41680=420. Direct: 6+24+60+120+210=420. ✔
Look at Figure 1 — each term is a "slab," and telescoping is the tower of slabs collapsing so only the outer shell (the four-factor product) survives.
Evaluate k=1∑nk(k+1)1 by telescoping (partial fractions), then check at n=100.
Recall Solution Q11
Why partial fractions? We need each term as a differencef(k)−f(k+1) so it telescopes. Split:
k(k+1)1=k1−k+11.(Check: k1−k+11=k(k+1)(k+1)−k=k(k+1)1 ✔.)Telescope with f(k)=k1 (note this is f(k)−f(k+1), so the sum is f(1)−f(n+1)):
∑k=1n(k1−k+11)=1−n+11=n+1n.
So k=1∑nk(k+1)1=n+1n.Check n=100:101100. As n→∞ this →1 — the infinite series converges to 1. This is the discrete cousin of an integral converging.
Find, in closed form, k=1∑nk3 using only telescoping with f(k)=k4 (reproduce the parent's Step 4 algebra fully), then evaluate the odd-only variant k=1k odd∑2m−1k3 at m=4 (i.e. 13+33+53+73).
Recall Solution Q12
Part A — derive ∑k3. Difference: (k+1)4−k4=4k3+6k2+4k+1. Sum 1→n; left telescopes to (n+1)4−1:
(n+1)4−1=4∑k3+6∑k2+4∑k+n.
Substitute ∑k2=6n(n+1)(2n+1) and ∑k=2n(n+1):
4∑k3=(n+1)4−1−n(n+1)(2n+1)−2n(n+1)−n.
Expand (n+1)4−1=n4+4n3+6n2+4n; n(n+1)(2n+1)=2n3+3n2+n; 2n(n+1)=2n2+2n. Then
4∑k3=n4+4n3+6n2+4n−(2n3+3n2+n)−(2n2+2n)−n=n4+2n3+n2=n2(n+1)2.∴∑k=1nk3=4n2(n+1)2=[2n(n+1)]2.✓Part B — odd cubes. Trick: (all cubes)−(even cubes) up to 2m−1. Even cubes are ∑j=1m−1(2j)3=8∑j=1m−1j3. For m=4 we want 13+33+53+73: all cubes to 7 minus even cubes 23,43,63.
∑k=17k3=[27⋅8]2=282=784.23+43+63=8(13+23+33)=8⋅36=288.13+33+53+73=784−288=496.Direct check:1+27+125+343=496. ✔
Evaluate k=1∑n(3k−1)(3k+2) in closed form, then compute it at n=10.
Recall Solution Q13
Expand the product to reach standard sums:
(3k−1)(3k+2)=9k2+6k−3k−2=9k2+3k−2.Linearity:∑k=1n(9k2+3k−2)=9∑k2+3∑k−2∑1.=9⋅6n(n+1)(2n+1)+3⋅2n(n+1)−2n=23n(n+1)(2n+1)+23n(n+1)−2n.
Combine the first two over 2: 23n(n+1)[(2n+1)+1]=23n(n+1)(2n+2)=3n(n+1)2. So
∑k=1n(3k−1)(3k+2)=3n(n+1)2−2n.At n=10:3⋅10⋅121−20=3630−20=3610.Spot-check the general form at n=1: formula 3⋅1⋅4−2=10; direct (3−1)(3+2)=2⋅5=10 ✔.
The leading-behaviour claim from the parent says ∑kp∼p+1np+1. Test it for p=2: compute the exact ratio n3/3∑k=1nk2 at n=10 and at n=1000, and state the limit. Connect this to Definite Integrals as Limits of Sums.
Recall Solution Q14
Exact sum over the model.n3/3∑k2=n33⋅6n(n+1)(2n+1)=2n2(n+1)(2n+1)=2n22n2+3n+1=1+2n3+2n21.At n=10:1+0.15+0.005=1.155.At n=1000:1+0.0015+0.0000005=1.0015005.Limit: as n→∞ both correction terms vanish, so the ratio →1. That confirms ∑k2∼31n3.
Why the integral? Scaling k=nx, n31∑k2≈n1∑(nk)2 is a Riemann sum for ∫01x2dx=31. The discrete power-sum is a staircase approximation to the smooth area — the 2n3 term is the leftover "staircase overshoot" that melts away. See Definite Integrals as Limits of Sums.
L1: grab the right formula, plug, compute. L2: linearity + shifting. L3: expand/re-index before any formula bites. L4: invent the telescoping f(k) yourself. L5: pick the whole strategy — split odd/even, compare to integrals, and know the difference between "∼" and "=".