Can you read the notation and count what it asks for?
Recall Solution L1.1
WHAT we do: substitute each integer k=2,3,4,5 into the general term 2k−1.
k=2:3,k=3:5,k=4:7,k=5:9.WHY:∑ is only shorthand for "add the general term for every integer from the lower to the upper limit."
Add:3+5+7+9=24.
Sanity check on the count: n−m+1=5−2+1=4 terms — and yes we wrote four numbers. ✓
Recall Solution L1.2
WHAT: count integers from −3 to 7 inclusive.
WHY the "+1": subtracting endpoints (7−(−3)=10) loses one term, so add it back.
n−m+1=7−(−3)+1=10+1=11.
Quick check: list them −3,−2,−1,0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7 — eleven values. ✓
Recall Solution L1.3
WHAT: the general term is the constant 7; it does not depend on k.
WHY: a constant added n times is nc. Here n=12 terms, each equal to 7.
∑k=1127=12⋅7=84.
Turn a messy sum into standard pieces and evaluate.
Recall Solution L2.1
Step 1 (split by linearity).k=1∑30(4k+5)=4k=1∑30k+k=1∑305.Why:∑ distributes over + and pulls constants out — one hard sum becomes two known pieces.
Step 2 (standard formula + constant).∑k=130k=230⋅31=465,∑k=1305=30⋅5=150.Step 3.4(465)+150=1860+150=2010.
Recall Solution L2.2
Step 1 (split).3∑k2−∑k.
Step 2 (plug in formulas).3⋅6n(n+1)(2n+1)−2n(n+1)=2n(n+1)(2n+1)−2n(n+1).Step 3 (common denominator, factor 2n(n+1)).2n(n+1)[(2n+1)−1]=2n(n+1)⋅2n=n2(n+1).
So k=1∑n(3k2−k)=n2(n+1).Check n=3: direct sum =(3⋅1−1)+(3⋅4−2)+(3⋅9−3)=2+10+24=36; formula =9⋅4=36. ✓
Recall Solution L2.3
WHAT: we only have a formula that starts at k=1. So compute the whole run to 20 and subtract the missing head k=1…5.
WHY:∑k=620=∑k=120−∑k=15 — the "start late" trick.
∑k=120k=220⋅21=210,∑k=15k=25⋅6=15.∑k=620k=210−15=195.
Recognise hidden telescoping structure and unpack it.
Recall Solution L3.1
Step 1 (partial fractions). Write k(k+1)1=kA+k+1B; clearing denominators
1=A(k+1)+Bk. Set k=0⇒A=1; set k=−1⇒B=−1. So
k(k+1)1=k1−k+11=f(k)−f(k+1),f(k)=k1.Step 2 (telescope). By the anchor formula, sum =f(1)−f(n+1)=1−n+11=n+1n.Step 3 (evaluate). At n=50: 5150≈0.98039. So k=1∑50k(k+1)1=5150.
Look at figure s01: the blue bars are the terms, and the red/green arrows show each −k+11
cancelling the next +k+11; only the far-left 1 and far-right −n+11 survive.
Recall Solution L3.2
Step 1 (partial fractions).k(k+2)1=21(k1−k+21).Why the 21: the gap between factors is 2, and the split leaves a 21 scale.
Step 2 (the cancellation is delayed). Because the tail is k+21 (not k+11),
each negative piece cancels the positive piece two rows later, not the next one.
Surviving heads: 11+21. Surviving tails: −n+11−n+21. Two survivors each end.Step 3.∑k=1nk(k+2)1=21(1+21−n+11−n+21)=21(23−n+11−n+21).Evaluate n=4:21(23−51−61)=21(3045−6−5)=21⋅3034=3017.
So k=1∑4k(k+2)1=3017.Figure s02 shows the "gap-2" offset: each blue term reaches across an empty slot before it meets its cancelling partner.
Recall Solution L3.3
Way 1 (telescope). The term is f(k+1)−f(k) with f(k)=k2 — a reversed difference,
so it collapses to f(n+1)−f(1)=(n+1)2−1.
Way 2 (expand then use formulas).(k+1)2−k2=2k+1, so
∑k=1n(2k+1)=2⋅2n(n+1)+n=n(n+1)+n=n2+2n=(n+1)2−1.
Both give (n+1)2−1=n2+2n. ✓ (At n=5: 35 both ways.)
Build the telescoping structure yourself, from scratch.
Recall Solution L4.1
Step 1 (design the partial fraction). The factors differ by 2, so expect a 21 scale:
(2k−1)(2k+1)1=21(2k−11−2k+11).
Check: 21⋅(2k−1)(2k+1)(2k+1)−(2k−1)=21⋅(2k−1)(2k+1)2 ✓.
Step 2 (telescope with f(k)=2k−11). Now ak=21[f(k)−f(k+1)] since 2(k+1)−1=2k+1.
Sum =21[f(1)−f(n+1)]=21(11−2n+11).Step 3 (simplify).∑k=1n(2k−1)(2k+1)1=21⋅2n+12n=2n+1n.Evaluate n=10:2110. So the answer is 2n+1n, giving 2110 at n=10.
Recall Solution L4.2
Step 1 (spot the "shrink the gap" pattern). The clean trick: write it as a difference of the
neighbouring product k(k+1)1:
k(k+1)1−(k+1)(k+2)1=k(k+1)(k+2)(k+2)−k=k(k+1)(k+2)2.WHY this move: the numerator became a constant2, so dividing by 2 isolates our term as a clean difference.
Hence with g(k)=k(k+1)1,
k(k+1)(k+2)1=21[g(k)−g(k+1)].Step 2 (telescope).∑=21[g(1)−g(n+1)]=21(1⋅21−(n+1)(n+2)1).Step 3 (simplify).∑k=1nk(k+1)(k+2)1=41−2(n+1)(n+2)1=4(n+1)(n+2)n(n+3).Check n=3: direct =61+241+601=12020+5+2=12027=409;
formula =4⋅4⋅53⋅6=8018=409. ✓
So the answer is 409 at n=3.
Step 1 (exact partial sum). From L4.1, Sn=k=1∑n(2k−1)(2k+1)1=2n+1n.WHY telescoping is the key: it hands us an exact closed form for the partial sum, so the infinite
sum is just its limit (see Convergence of Series).
Step 2 (limit). As n→∞, divide top and bottom by n:
limn→∞2n+1n=limn→∞2+n11=21.Step 3 (conclusion). The partial sums approach 21, so the series converges with sum 21.
Recall Solution L5.2
Step 1 (the identity that "knows about k2"). Expand (k+1)3−k3=3k2+3k+1.
WHY this tool: summing a difference telescopes, and this particular difference contains k2 — so
summing it lets us solve for ∑k2.
Step 2 (sum both sides, left telescopes).∑k=1n[(k+1)3−k3]=(n+1)3−13=(n+1)3−1.∑k=1n(3k2+3k+1)=3∑k2+3⋅2n(n+1)+n.Step 3 (solve for ∑k2). Set them equal:
3∑k2=(n+1)3−1−23n(n+1)−n.
Expand (n+1)3−1=n3+3n2+3n. Then
3∑k2=n3+3n2+3n−23n2+3n−n=n3+23n2+2n=22n3+3n2+n=2n(n+1)(2n+1).Step 4. Divide by 3: k=1∑nk2=6n(n+1)(2n+1).■
A rigorous alternative is Mathematical Induction — but the telescope derives the formula instead of merely verifying it.
Recall Solution L5.3
Step 1 (split by linearity — two independent worlds).∑k=1nk3+∑k=1nk(k+1)1.Step 2 (standard cube sum + telescope from L3.1).∑k=1nk3=[2n(n+1)]2,∑k=1nk(k+1)1=n+1n.Step 3 (combine).∑k=1n[k3+k(k+1)1]=[2n(n+1)]2+n+1n.Evaluate n=4: cubes =(24⋅5)2=102=100; telescope =54. Total =100+54=5504=100.8.
Recall One-line recap of the whole ladder
L1 read & count → L2 split with linearity + standard sums → L3 spot telescoping via partial
fractions → L4design the split (mind the scale factor) → L5 prove, take limits, combine.
Every telescope obeys the same heart: first survivor minus last survivor.