3.3.7 · D4Sequences & Series

Exercises — Sigma (Σ) notation — evaluating, telescoping sums

1,933 words9 min readBack to topic

Everything below uses only ideas built in the parent note. As a reminder of the two anchors:


Level 1 — Recognition

Can you read the notation and count what it asks for?

Recall Solution L1.1

WHAT we do: substitute each integer into the general term . WHY: is only shorthand for "add the general term for every integer from the lower to the upper limit." Add: . Sanity check on the count: terms — and yes we wrote four numbers. ✓

Recall Solution L1.2

WHAT: count integers from to inclusive. WHY the "+1": subtracting endpoints () loses one term, so add it back. Quick check: list them — eleven values. ✓

Recall Solution L1.3

WHAT: the general term is the constant ; it does not depend on . WHY: a constant added times is . Here terms, each equal to .


Level 2 — Application

Turn a messy sum into standard pieces and evaluate.

Recall Solution L2.1

Step 1 (split by linearity). Why: distributes over and pulls constants out — one hard sum becomes two known pieces. Step 2 (standard formula + constant). Step 3.

Recall Solution L2.2

Step 1 (split). . Step 2 (plug in formulas). Step 3 (common denominator, factor ). So Check : direct sum ; formula . ✓

Recall Solution L2.3

WHAT: we only have a formula that starts at . So compute the whole run to and subtract the missing head . WHY: — the "start late" trick.


Level 3 — Analysis

Recognise hidden telescoping structure and unpack it.

Recall Solution L3.1

Step 1 (partial fractions). Write ; clearing denominators . Set ; set . So Step 2 (telescope). By the anchor formula, sum Step 3 (evaluate). At : . So Look at figure s01: the blue bars are the terms, and the red/green arrows show each cancelling the next ; only the far-left and far-right survive.

Figure — Sigma (Σ) notation — evaluating, telescoping sums
Recall Solution L3.2

Step 1 (partial fractions). Why the : the gap between factors is , and the split leaves a scale. Step 2 (the cancellation is delayed). Because the tail is (not ), each negative piece cancels the positive piece two rows later, not the next one. Surviving heads: . Surviving tails: . Two survivors each end. Step 3. Evaluate : So Figure s02 shows the "gap-2" offset: each blue term reaches across an empty slot before it meets its cancelling partner.

Figure — Sigma (Σ) notation — evaluating, telescoping sums
Recall Solution L3.3

Way 1 (telescope). The term is with — a reversed difference, so it collapses to . Way 2 (expand then use formulas). , so Both give . ✓ (At : both ways.)


Level 4 — Synthesis

Build the telescoping structure yourself, from scratch.

Recall Solution L4.1

Step 1 (design the partial fraction). The factors differ by , so expect a scale: Check: ✓. Step 2 (telescope with ). Now since . Sum Step 3 (simplify). Evaluate : . So the answer is , giving at .

Recall Solution L4.2

Step 1 (spot the "shrink the gap" pattern). The clean trick: write it as a difference of the neighbouring product : WHY this move: the numerator became a constant , so dividing by isolates our term as a clean difference. Hence with , Step 2 (telescope). Step 3 (simplify). Check : direct ; formula . ✓ So the answer is at .


Level 5 — Mastery

Prove, take limits, and combine every tool.

Recall Solution L5.1

Step 1 (exact partial sum). From L4.1, WHY telescoping is the key: it hands us an exact closed form for the partial sum, so the infinite sum is just its limit (see Convergence of Series). Step 2 (limit). As , divide top and bottom by : Step 3 (conclusion). The partial sums approach , so the series converges with sum .

Recall Solution L5.2

Step 1 (the identity that "knows about "). Expand . WHY this tool: summing a difference telescopes, and this particular difference contains — so summing it lets us solve for . Step 2 (sum both sides, left telescopes). Step 3 (solve for ). Set them equal: Expand . Then Step 4. Divide by : A rigorous alternative is Mathematical Induction — but the telescope derives the formula instead of merely verifying it.

Recall Solution L5.3

Step 1 (split by linearity — two independent worlds). Step 2 (standard cube sum + telescope from L3.1). Step 3 (combine). Evaluate : cubes ; telescope . Total


Recall One-line recap of the whole ladder

L1 read & count → L2 split with linearity + standard sums → L3 spot telescoping via partial fractions → L4 design the split (mind the scale factor) → L5 prove, take limits, combine. Every telescope obeys the same heart: first survivor minus last survivor.


Connections

  • Partial Fractions — the engine that manufactures in L3–L4.
  • Method of Differences — the general name for what we did in every telescope here.
  • Arithmetic Progressions — L2 linear sums are AP sums in disguise.
  • Mathematical Induction — the rigorous partner to the L5.2 derivation.
  • Convergence of Series — L5.1 turns an exact partial sum into an infinite-sum limit.
  • Binomial Theorem — expanding in L5.2 is a tiny binomial expansion.