3.3.6 · D4Sequences & Series

Exercises — Arithmetic-geometric progression — finding sum

2,395 words11 min readBack to topic

Figure — Arithmetic-geometric progression — finding sum
Figure 1 — The decision map (blueprint style). Start at the top: is the sum finite ( terms) or infinite? Finite always uses the boxed . Infinite first passes the gate "?": if yes, use ; if , the series diverges and no infinite sum exists. The amber side-note reminds you of the trivial edge case where only the first term survives. This single test decides which formula is even legal.

Use this map before every problem: it stops you reaching for when the series diverges.


L1 — Recognition

Here you only have to read off , , from a series. No summing yet — but if you can't extract these three numbers cleanly, nothing downstream works.

Recall Solution 1.1

What we do: split each term into (AP number) (GP number).

  • AP part: the numbers multiplying the powers are — they go up by . So , .
  • GP part: the powers are So .

General term (AP value GP value): Answer: .

Recall Solution 1.2

What we do: try to write . Take : then . To match we need the AP part to be constant , i.e. and . So yes — it is an AGP with . When the arithmetic part never changes, so the AGP collapses into a pure GP (see Sum to infinity of GP). AGP is the general family; GP is the corner of it.


L2 — Application

Now plug numbers into the formulas — but first check which formula is legal.

Recall Solution 2.1

Extract: coefficients ; powers give . Since , the infinite formula is legal. Combine over : Answer: .

Recall Solution 2.2

Extract: ; the powers mean . Here , so the infinite sum exists. First piece . Second piece . Answer: . (Sanity: partial sums .)

Recall Solution 2.3

Direct add: the terms are , so . Formula (note — only the finite formula is allowed here). With :

  • First term: .
  • Second: .
  • Third: .

L3 — Analysis

Here the AGP is disguised — you must reshape the problem before any formula fits.

Recall Solution 3.1

The disguise: the power is , not . Our formula assumes . Factor one power out to fix the offset: Now it is standard: inside, . Multiply back by : Answer: .

Recall Solution 3.2

Set up:

  • . This satisfies . ✓
  • . Here , so the infinite series diverges — the algebraic root is spurious. Answer: only is valid. (Check: . ✓)

L4 — Synthesis

Combine AGP with other series tools — split, subtract, reassemble; and handle a negative ratio.

Recall Solution 4.1

Why the hint? Our AGP formula handles (linear coefficient), not . But turns the quadratic into pieces we can sum. With :

Piece B first (re-derived here, not just cited). Let . Use the same multiply-and-shift trick as an AGP with : Subtract: (a pure GP, ). So , giving At :

Piece A (justify the identity on-page). Let (I pulled out so the counting is clean). Watch WHY this equals : differentiate the geometric series twice. Start from Differentiate once w.r.t. (each ): Differentiate again (each ): Why differentiation is the right tool: each derivative in pulls the exponent down as a multiplying factor, exactly manufacturing the coefficients then we need — it is the machine that turns a plain GP into these weighted sums (see Power series and generating functions). So . Now Piece A wanted , one power higher than , so Piece A :

Combine: Answer: . (Sanity: partial sums .)

Recall Solution 4.2

Why this is different: with the powers flip sign every term, so the series alternates . The formula still applies because the only requirement is , and . ✓ Extract: . Note . Second piece . Answer: . (Sanity: partial sums oscillate toward — the tug-of-war between and terms settles down because each is smaller than the last.)

Recall Solution 4.3

Plug in ():

  • Term 1: .
  • Term 2: numerator ; divide by : .
  • Term 3: ; ; divide by (with the minus sign): . Answer: . (Direct check: . ✓)

L5 — Mastery

Full multiply-and-shift from scratch, general parameters, edge cases.

Recall Solution 5.1

Write (coefficients , step ). Multiply by and shift: Subtract: for each aligned power the coefficient drops by , and the very first has nothing above it: The bracket is a pure GP with first term , ratio : its sum is . Formula check: Answer: .

Recall Solution 5.2

Why the formula dies: every denominator contains ; at that is — division by zero. The multiply-and-shift trick also fails because multiplying by changes nothing, so there is nothing to cancel. What actually happens: with each GP factor is , so — the series is just a pure AP (see Arithmetic Progression). Use the AP sum: Answer: . The AGP method degenerates to the AP formula when .

Recall Solution 5.3

Why this matters: is obtained by dropping this "leftover" third term as . We watch it die. Here , so the third term is .

  • : .
  • : .
  • : . Trend: . The exponential crushes the linear (this is exactly Limits: exponential vs polynomial growth). Hence the finite sum slides into . Conclusion: the third term decays to as (values ), so . This is precisely why the infinite formula is just the finite one with its last two -carrying pieces deleted. Answer: third term ; limit ; .

Active recall

Connections

Concept Map

finite

infinite

yes

no

AGP sum needed

Finite or infinite

Use boxed Sn

Check abs r under 1

Use S infinity

Series diverges

r equals 0 gives just a

r equals 1 gives pure AP