Figure 1 — The decision map (blueprint style). Start at the top: is the sum finite (n terms) or infinite? Finite always uses the boxed Sn. Infinite first passes the gate "∣r∣<1?": if yes, use S∞; if ∣r∣≥1, the series diverges and no infinite sum exists. The amber r=0 side-note reminds you of the trivial edge case where only the first term survives. This single test decides which formula is even legal.
Use this map before every problem: it stops you reaching for S∞ when the series diverges.
Here you only have to read offa, d, r from a series. No summing yet — but if you can't extract these three numbers cleanly, nothing downstream works.
Recall Solution 1.1
What we do: split each term into (AP number) × (GP number).
AP part: the numbers multiplying the powers are 5,8,11,14,… — they go up by 3. So a=5, d=3.
GP part: the powers are 1,31,91,271,⋯=(31)0,(31)1,… So r=31.
General term (AP value × GP value):
Tn=(5+(n−1)⋅3)(31)n−1=(3n+2)(31)n−1.Answer:a=5,d=3,r=31,Tn=(3n+2)/3n−1.
Recall Solution 1.2
What we do: try to write Tn=(a+(n−1)d)rn−1.
Take r=2: then rn−1=1,2,4,8,…. To match 2,4,8,16 we need the AP part to be constant =2, i.e. a=2 and d=0.
So yes — it is an AGP with a=2,d=0,r=2. When d=0 the arithmetic part never changes, so the AGP collapses into a pure GP (see Sum to infinity of GP). AGP is the general family; GP is the d=0 corner of it.
Now plug numbers into the formulas — but first check which formula is legal.
Recall Solution 2.1
Extract: coefficients 1,3,5,7⇒a=1,d=2; powers give r=x. Since ∣x∣<1, the infinite formula is legal.
S∞=1−ra+(1−r)2dr=1−x1+(1−x)22x.Combine over (1−x)2:
=(1−x)2(1−x)+2x=(1−x)21+x.Answer:(1−x)21+x.
Recall Solution 2.2
Extract:a=1,d=1; the powers 3−(n−1) mean r=31. Here ∣r∣=31<1, so the infinite sum exists.
S=1−311+(1−31)21⋅31=321+9431.
First piece =23. Second piece =31⋅49=43.
S=23+43=49.Answer:49=2.25. (Sanity: partial sums 1,1.667,1.999,2.147,⋯→2.25.)
Recall Solution 2.3
Direct add: the terms are 1⋅1=1,2⋅2=4,3⋅4=12,4⋅8=32, so 1+4+12+32=49.
Formula (note r=2>1 — only the finite formula is allowed here). With a=1,d=1,r=2,n=4:
S4=1−21+(1−2)21⋅2(1−23)−1−2(1+3⋅1)24.
Here the AGP is disguised — you must reshape the problem before any formula fits.
Recall Solution 3.1
The disguise: the power is 5−n, not 5−(n−1). Our formula assumes rn−1. Factor one power out to fix the offset:
S=∑n=1∞(2n−1)(51)n=51∑n=1∞(2n−1)(51)n−1.Now it is standard: inside, a=1,d=2,r=51.
∑(2n−1)rn−1=1−511+(1−51)22⋅51=541+251652=45+52⋅1625=45+85=815.
Multiply back by 51:
S=51⋅815=83.Answer:83.
Recall Solution 3.2
Set up:(1−r)21=4⇒(1−r)2=41⇒1−r=±21.
1−r=+21⇒r=21. This satisfies ∣r∣<1. ✓
1−r=−21⇒r=23. Here ∣r∣=23>1, so the infinite series diverges — the algebraic root is spurious.
Answer: only r=21 is valid. (Check: (1−21)21=1/41=4. ✓)
Combine AGP with other series tools — split, subtract, reassemble; and handle a negative ratio.
Recall Solution 4.1
Why the hint? Our AGP formula handles ∑nrn−1 (linear coefficient), not ∑n2rn−1. But n2=n(n−1)+n turns the quadratic into pieces we can sum. With r=21:
S=Piece A∑n(n−1)rn−1+Piece B∑nrn−1.
Piece B first (re-derived here, not just cited). Let B=∑n≥1nrn−1. Use the same multiply-and-shift trick as an AGP with a=1,d=1:
B=1+2r+3r2+4r3+⋯,rB=r+2r2+3r3+⋯
Subtract: B−rB=1+r+r2+r3+⋯=1−r1 (a pure GP, ∣r∣<1). So (1−r)B=1−r1, giving
B=(1−r)21.
At r=21: B=(1/2)21=4.
Piece A (justify the identity on-page). Let A0=∑n≥1n(n−1)rn−2 (I pulled out rn−2 so the counting is clean). Watch WHY this equals (1−r)32: differentiate the geometric series twice. Start from
1−r1=∑n≥0rn=1+r+r2+r3+⋯
Differentiate once w.r.t. r (each rn→nrn−1):
(1−r)21=∑n≥1nrn−1.
Differentiate again (each nrn−1→n(n−1)rn−2):
(1−r)32=∑n≥2n(n−1)rn−2.Why differentiation is the right tool: each derivative in r pulls the exponent down as a multiplying factor, exactly manufacturing the coefficients n then n(n−1) we need — it is the machine that turns a plain GP into these weighted sums (see Power series and generating functions). So A0=(1−r)32.
Now Piece A wanted rn−1, one power higher than A0, so Piece A =r⋅A0:
Piece A=r⋅(1−r)32=21⋅(1/2)32=21⋅1/82=21⋅16=8.
Why this is different: with r=−21 the powers flip sign every term, so the series alternates+,−,+,−. The formula still applies because the only requirement is ∣r∣<1, and ∣−21∣=21<1. ✓
Extract:a=1,d=1,r=−21. Note 1−r=1−(−21)=23.
S=1−r1+(1−r)2dr=231+(23)21⋅(−21)=32+49−21.
Second piece =−21⋅94=−92.
S=32−92=96−92=94.Answer:S=94. (Sanity: partial sums 1,0,0.75,0.25,0.5625,… oscillate toward0.444…=94 — the tug-of-war between + and − terms settles down because each is smaller than the last.)
Recall Solution 4.3
Plug in (1−r=21):
S5=212+(21)23⋅21(1−(21)4)−21(2+4⋅3)(21)5.
Term 1: 2/21=4.
Term 2: numerator =23(1−161)=23⋅1615=3245; divide by 41: 3245⋅4=845.
Term 3: (2+12)=14; 14⋅321=3214=167; divide by 21 (with the minus sign): −167⋅2=−87.
S5=4+845−87=4+838=4+419=435.Answer:S5=435=8.75. (Direct check: 2+2.5+2+1.375+0.875=8.75. ✓)
Full multiply-and-shift from scratch, general parameters, edge cases.
Recall Solution 5.1
WriteS=3+5⋅41+7⋅161+9⋅641+⋯ (coefficients 3,5,7,9,…, step d=2).
Multiply by r=41 and shift:
41S=3⋅41+5⋅161+7⋅641+⋯Subtract: for each aligned power the coefficient drops by d=2, and the very first 3 has nothing above it:
S−41S=3+(2⋅41+2⋅161+2⋅641+⋯).
The bracket is a pure GP with first term 2⋅41=21, ratio 41: its sum is 1−1/41/2=3/41/2=32.
43S=3+32=311⇒S=34⋅311=944.Formula check:3/43+(3/4)22⋅41=4+9/161/2=4+98=944.✓Answer:S∞=944.
Recall Solution 5.2
Why the formula dies: every denominator contains (1−r); at r=1 that is 0 — division by zero. The multiply-and-shift trick also fails because multiplying by r=1 changes nothing, so there is nothing to cancel.
What actually happens: with r=1 each GP factor is 1, so Tn=a+(n−1)d — the series is just a pure AP (see Arithmetic Progression). Use the AP sum:
S6=2n(2a+(n−1)d)=26(2⋅2+5⋅3)=3⋅(4+15)=3⋅19=57.Answer:S6=57. The AGP method degenerates to the AP formula when r=1.
Recall Solution 5.3
Why this matters:S∞ is obtained by dropping this "leftover" third term as n→∞. We watch it die. Here 1−r1=23, so the third term is −23n(31)n.
n=1: −23⋅1⋅31=−21=−0.5.
n=3: −23⋅3⋅271=−23⋅273=−61≈−0.1667.
n=10: −23⋅10⋅590491≈−2.54×10−4.
Trend:−0.5,−0.167,−0.00025,⋯→0. The exponential rn crushes the linear n (this is exactly Limits: exponential vs polynomial growth). Hence the finite sum slides into S∞=1−311+(1−31)231=23+43=49.
Conclusion: the third term decays to 0 as n→∞ (values −0.5,−61,≈−0.000254), so Sn→S∞=49. This is precisely why the infinite formula is just the finite one with its last two rn-carrying pieces deleted.
Answer: third term =−0.5,−61,≈−0.000254; limit 0; S∞=49.