Visual walkthrough — Laws of logarithms — product, quotient, power rules — proofs
Step 0 — What even IS a logarithm? (the one idea everything rests on)
WHAT. Pick a fixed number to multiply by, over and over. Call it the base, written . Start at and keep multiplying by . A logarithm just counts how many times you multiplied.
- — the base, the thing we repeatedly multiply by (we need ).
- — the number we ended up at (must be ).
- — the answer: the number of times we multiplied. This is the log.
WHY this and not just "divide"? Because repeated multiplication doesn't undo with division — it undoes with counting the multiplications. The log is the tool built specifically to answer the question " to what power gives ?" Nothing else answers that.
PICTURE. Below, the base is . Each step to the right is one multiplication by . The red number under each landing spot is its logarithm — literally the step count.

Step 1 — Name the two logs so we can hold them
WHAT. We want to understand — the log of a product of two positive numbers and . First, give each separate log a short name:
- — two positive numbers we will multiply.
- — how many times you multiply to reach .
- — how many times you multiply to reach .
WHY name them? We can't manipulate an unknown we keep spelling out in full. Naming and turns vague "logs" into ordinary numbers we can add later. This is the single move that makes the whole proof possible.
PICTURE. Two separate step-counts on the same number line: steps land on , steps land on .

Step 2 — Translate each name back into "multiply by "
WHAT. The definition from Step 0 says a log is an exponent, so we rewrite and in exponential form:
- — " multiplications by lands you exactly on ."
- — " multiplications by lands you exactly on ."
WHY undo the log? Products of powers of the same base have a beautiful, simple rule (next step). Logs by themselves don't multiply nicely — but powers of do. So we leave "log-land" and enter "exponent-land" where the algebra is easy.
PICTURE. The same two landings, now labelled as heights and — this is the identical picture as Step 1, just relabelled to remind us and are secretly powers of .

Step 3 — Multiply, and watch the exponents ADD
WHAT. Now multiply the two numbers together:
- — the product we actually care about.
- — substitute what and really are.
- — because multiplying same-base powers adds the exponents.
WHY do exponents add? Multiplying by a further times, after already multiplying times, is just multiplying times in total. Counting doesn't care where you paused. This single fact — see Exponentials — laws of indices — is the engine of the product rule.
PICTURE. Stack the two step-counts end to end: steps, then more steps, reach in steps total. The red bracket shows the combined count.

Step 4 — Read the total count as a single log
WHAT. Apply to both sides. The log of " to a power" just hands back the power (that's the counter reading off its own count):
- — the thing we set out to find.
- — same value, written with the exponent exposed.
- — the log cancels the base cleanly, leaving just the exponent, because .
WHY does ? By definition asks "how many 's?" and is made of exactly of them. Question and answer are already staring at each other.
PICTURE. The red bracket of total length from Step 4, now read as one number — the log of the landing point .

Step 5 — Swap the names back
WHAT. Recall from Step 1 that and . Substitute them back:
- Left side — one log of a product.
- Right side — a sum of two separate logs.
WHY this is the finish. Every symbol we invented (, ) has been paid back. What remains is a statement about the original quantities only — a genuine law.
PICTURE. Product on the left, sum on the right, joined by the red equals sign — the mirror that turns into .

Step 6 — The edge cases (never leave a gap)
WHAT. Check the boundaries where a careless reader might trip.
Case . Then , and (zero steps: ). The rule reads ✅ — consistent.
Case . Then and the rule gives — which is exactly the power rule for . The product rule contains it.
Forbidden case or . There is no count with equal to a non-positive number: a positive base to any real power stays positive. So simply doesn't exist, and the rule doesn't apply — you may only combine logs whose arguments are .
WHY show these. A law you can't state the limits of is a law you'll misuse. The domain restriction is not decoration — it's why the picture (a number line of positive landing points) never crosses zero.
PICTURE. The positive number line with a red "forbidden zone" at and below — no landing spot lives there.

The one-picture summary
Everything above, compressed: multiply along the number line ⇒ add the step-counts. That is the product rule, seen in a single image.

Recall Feynman retelling — say it in plain words
A logarithm is just a step counter: how many times did I multiply by the base to get here? Take two numbers, and . It took me steps to reach and steps to reach . Now I multiply them together. Multiplying is continuing to walk — I take the steps to , then more steps, landing on . Total steps? Just . But "total steps to reach " is exactly , and is exactly . So the log of a product is the sum of the logs — because walking further just adds to your step count. It only works while and stay positive, since you can never step onto a zero or negative landing spot.
Recall Which step is the real "engine"?
Step 3: — same-base multiplication adds exponents. Everything else is naming and translating.
Recall Why must
? is a positive base to a real power, always positive. Non-positive numbers have no step-count, so no log — the derivation's number line never reaches them.
Connections
- Exponentials — laws of indices — the rule that powers Step 3.
- Change of base formula — proved by the same "name-then-translate" move.
- Solving exponential equations with logs — where combining logs earns marks.
- Natural logarithm ln and e — identical picture, base .
- Graphs of logarithmic functions — the visual domain from Step 6.