3.2.7 · D4Exponentials & Logarithms

Exercises — Common log (log₁₀) and natural log (ln x)

2,498 words11 min readBack to topic
Figure — Common log (log₁₀) and natural log (ln x)

We will lean on three helpers, all from Laws of Logarithms (product, quotient, power):

And two named constants we quote repeatedly (from the parent note):


L1 · Recognition

Here you only need the definition " = what power?" — no algebra yet.

Problem 1.1

Evaluate without a calculator: .

Recall Solution 1.1

WHAT we ask: "10 to what power gives ?" Count the zeros: (five factors of ten). Why? Each zero is one more ×10. Read the exponent: .

Problem 1.2

Evaluate without a calculator: .

Recall Solution 1.2

WHAT we ask: " to what power gives ?" The base of is , and the number is already written as a power of . So asks "which power?" and the number tells us: it's . This is the "log and exp cancel" fact: for any .

Problem 1.3

Evaluate: .

Recall Solution 1.3

Rewrite as a power of ten first. Two decimal places means two factors of : Why the minus sign? Dividing by is the same as multiplying by ; do it twice → . Read the exponent: .


L2 · Application

Now use one rule or one step of undoing to isolate an unknown.

Problem 2.1

Solve . Give to 4 decimal places.

Recall Solution 2.1

WHY take a log? The unknown is stuck in the exponent. A log is the exact tool that pulls exponents down (product/power law), so we apply to both sides. Sanity check: is between and , so should be between and . ✅

Problem 2.2

Solve . Give to 4 decimal places.

Recall Solution 2.2

WHY here and not ? The base of the exponential is , so (base ) cancels it cleanly with no extra constant. Apply to both sides: Why did the LHS become ? Because ; here . Isolate by dividing by :

Problem 2.3

Solve . Give to 4 decimal places.

Recall Solution 2.3

The base is , and our calculator only has base- and base- buttons. Take of both sides and let the power law bring down: Divide by (a constant number, ): This is exactly the change-of-base formula in action.


L3 · Analysis

Combine several laws; watch the structure.

Problem 3.1

Write as a single log, then evaluate it exactly.

Recall Solution 3.1

Combine with product then quotient laws. Sums become products, the subtraction becomes a divide: Simplify inside: . Notice we never touched a calculator — the pieces were designed to collapse to a power of ten.

Problem 3.2

Solve for : .

Recall Solution 3.2

Combine the left side with the product law: Undo the log using the definition (): Factor: , so or . Check the domain — CRUCIAL for logs. We need both and , i.e. .

  • : gives ✅ — valid.
  • : makes undefined ❌ — reject.

Problem 3.3

Given , find without a calculator.

Recall Solution 3.3

Clever move: . Use the quotient law so the gives an exact : Why this works: anything you can build out of s and s, you can log by hand once you know .


L4 · Synthesis

Build a solution that crosses topics.

Problem 4.1

A radioactive sample decays by the model , where is in years (see Exponential growth and decay models). Find the half-life — the time for to drop to . Give the answer to 2 decimal places.

Recall Solution 4.1

Set up the "half" condition. We want : Divide by (the starting amount, non-zero) — this is why half-life doesn't depend on how much you start with: Take (base matches the in the model, so it cancels cleanly): Why is ? Because and the power law slides the out front. Solve for (two negatives cancel, so as a time should be):

Problem 4.2

The Richter magnitude of an earthquake is , where is the quake's intensity and a fixed reference. Quake A measures and quake B measures . How many times more intense is A than B?

Recall Solution 4.2

Turn each magnitude back into an intensity ratio using the definition of log: Divide A by B so the common reference cancels: Why subtract exponents? Dividing same-base powers subtracts exponents — the exponential form of the quotient law. Lesson: a difference of just on a log scale is a factor of in the real quantity — that's the whole point of log scales.


L5 · Mastery

Reason abstractly; prove and generalise.

Problem 5.1

Prove the reciprocal identity for valid bases (neither equal to ). Then use it to state in terms of .

Recall Solution 5.1

Start from change of base (from the parent note), writing both sides in natural logs: Multiply them: Why does everything cancel? The numerator of one is the denominator of the other — the fractions are literal reciprocals. Since the product is , each is the reciprocal of the other: Apply with : This is exactly the "Forecast-then-Verify" fact from the parent note.

Problem 5.2

Solve the equation exactly, then give a 4-dp decimal.

Recall Solution 5.2

Take of both sides so the two different bases both surrender their exponents: Expand the right side and gather all terms on one side: Factor out : Why flip both signs? Multiplying top and bottom by keeps the value but makes the denominator , which reads more cleanly. Compute:

Problem 5.3

For which real values of is defined? Explain each gate.

Recall Solution 5.3

Work from the outside in — but read the gates from the inside out.

  • Inner gate: for to exist we need .
  • Outer gate: the outer needs its input to be strictly positive: Solve the outer condition. means " is a positive power of ten," which happens exactly when (since and logs grow past that). Combine: already forces , so the binding condition is: Check the boundary: at , , and is undefined — confirming we need strictly greater than , not .

Score yourself


Connections