3.2.6 · D4Exponentials & Logarithms

Exercises — Logarithm — definition as inverse of exponential

2,490 words11 min readBack to topic

Level 1 — Recognition

Here we only translate between exponential form and log form, and read off exponents we already know. No algebra yet.

Recall Solution

Ask the question the log is asking: " to what power gives ?" We know , so the exponent is .

Recall Solution

The definition says . Here , , . Same fact, two costumes.

Recall Solution

" to what power gives ?" Counting zeros: .


Level 2 — Application

Now the exponent is fractional, negative, or zero — and the base may even be less than 1. You must recall what those exponents do.

Recall Solution

" to what power gives ?" A fraction below needs a negative exponent when the base is . Since , we have .

Recall Solution

" to what power gives ?" We need the half-step, because is the square root of . , so

Recall Solution

" to what power gives ?" Any nonzero base to the power equals : . This is why every log graph passes through .

Recall Solution

The base is , which is between 0 and 1, so raising it to a positive power makes things smaller, and to a negative power makes them bigger. Look at the falling yellow curve in the figure above.

  • " to what power gives ?" We must grow, so the exponent is negative: . Hence
  • " to what power gives ?" Now we shrink, needing a positive exponent: . Hence Notice the signs flip compared with a base — that is the whole personality of a logarithm.
Recall Solution

These are the two golden identities and from the parent note.

  • — raise to the exponent that by definition gives .
  • — the exponent is written right there.

Level 3 — Analysis

Here you must switch forms deliberately and use a common base to solve equations.

Recall Solution

Why not just take a log immediately? Because both sides are powers of , so we can equate exponents exactly using the equal-base rule from the toolkit (, valid because is one-to-one). and , so The step "" is exactly the equal-base rule in action.

Recall Solution

This is log form. Convert to exponential form — that's the whole trick.

Recall Solution

The unknown is the base. Convert to exponential form: Check the base is legal: and . ✓

Recall Solution

Common base : and . Then apply the equal-base rule: Sanity check: base giving a result below ⇒ exponent negative. ✓


Level 4 — Synthesis

Combine the definition with the log laws or the Change of base formula — all restated in the toolkit callout at the top.

Recall Solution

Break into the pieces we know: . Product rule → sum; power rule → the exponent comes down:

Recall Solution

Quotient rule turns a difference of logs into a log of a quotient:

Recall Solution

Change-of-base formula (from the toolkit): for any legal base , Taking , , : (since ) and , so Check directly: . ✓

Recall Solution

Product rule collapses the left side into one log: Now check the domain ( needed inside each log): makes undefined — reject it. gives . ✓


Level 5 — Mastery

Full multi-step reasoning; a picture to keep you honest.

Recall Solution

Step 1 — find . On at : . Step 2 — find . On at : . So , . Step 3 — the geometry. The exponential passes through ; the logarithm passes through . The coordinates are swapped. That is exactly what reflection in the line does — see the figure below and Inverse functions and reflection in $y=x$.

Figure — Logarithm — definition as inverse of exponential
Recall Solution

Spot the hidden quadratic. Let (so always). Then : Undo the substitution:

  • Both give , so both are valid:
Recall Solution

The bases differ ( and ) with no common base — this is precisely when we take logs of both sides (Solving exponential equations). Which base of log? It does not matter — any base works, because taking a log is applying the same one-to-one function to both sides. Base , base , or base all give the same final ; the ratio of logs just gets written differently. We'll pick because it's on every calculator. Power rule brings exponents down (the whole exponent): Expand and collect the terms: (Redo it with and you get the identical — proof the base choice was free.)

Recall Solution

Proof. By the change-of-base formula into (any) common base, say : Multiply — the pieces cancel: Application. With : (since ) and .



Connections