Intuition What this page is
The parent note showed you the shape of a x and why it hugs the line y = 0 . This page is the workout . We list every kind of question this topic can throw at you — growth, decay, shifted floors, reflections, "solve for the exponent", limits, a real-world story, and one nasty exam twist — then we solve one example for each so you never meet a case you haven't already seen.
Before anything: three things we will lean on.
a x means "the base a multiplied together, but with the exponent x allowed to be any real number" (see the parent for how fractions and negatives are defined).
x → − ∞ is read "x marches off to the far left forever". The arrow → means "gets closer and closer to".
a — what values are allowed
An exponential function is y = a x where the base must satisfy
a > 0 , a = 1.
Why a > 0 ? If a were negative, then a non-integer power like a 1/2 = a asks for the square root of a negative number, which is not a real number . Worse, a 1/3 , a 2/5 , … flip sign unpredictably, so the graph would be full of holes and jumps instead of a smooth real curve. Forbidding a ≤ 0 keeps every output real.
Why a = 1 ? If a = 1 then 1 x = 1 for every x — a flat horizontal line y = 1 , a trivial constant function with no growth, no decay, no curve. It is not a genuine exponential, so we exclude it. (This is our degenerate case, cell C0 below.)
Every exam question on a x is really one of these cells . Each worked example below is stamped with its cell.
There are 11 cells (C0–C10) and 10 worked examples below. Example 0 handles the degenerate cell C0; Example 8 handles two cells (C8 and C6, cross-referenced there); the remaining eight take one cell each. Together they cover every cell.
y = 1 x look like, and why is it excluded?
Forecast: If you double repeatedly you get growth; if you "one-tuple" repeatedly, what happens?
Step 1. Evaluate at several x : 1 0 = 1 , 1 5 = 1 , 1 − 3 = 1 , 1 1/2 = 1 = 1 .
Why this step? Multiplying by 1 never changes anything, so every output is 1 .
Step 2. The graph is the flat line y = 1 — no curve, no asymptote, no growth or decay.
Why this step? This is exactly why the definition demands a = 1 : a constant line is not a genuine exponential.
Verify: 1 x = 1 for all tested x ✔ — a horizontal line, correctly excluded.
y = 3 x and label its two anchors
Forecast: Guess — will 3 x be steeper or flatter than 2 x ? Which point are they forced to share?
Step 1. Compute the two guaranteed anchors: x = 0 ⇒ 3 0 = 1 and x = 1 ⇒ 3 1 = 3 .
Why this step? Every a x passes through ( 0 , 1 ) because a 0 = 1 ; the point ( 1 , a ) literally is the base. These two lock the curve down instantly.
Step 2. Add flattening points on the left: x = − 1 ⇒ 3 1 , x = − 2 ⇒ 9 1 .
Why this step? To see the curve sinking toward the floor y = 0 without touching it.
In the figure below, the pale-yellow curve is 3 x and the chalk-blue curve is 2 x ; the pink dashed line is the asymptote y = 0 . The yellow curve climbs faster but they cross only at ( 0 , 1 ) .
Verify: 3 1 = 3 ✔, 3 − 1 = 1/3 ≈ 0.333 ✔. At x = 0 both bases give 1 ✔.
y = ( 2 1 ) x and confirm y > 0
Forecast: As x grows, does the output ever dip below zero, or just get tiny?
Step 1. Rewrite ( 2 1 ) x = 2 − x .
Why this step? A base between 0 and 1 is easier to read as a negative exponent of a base > 1 — it flags "this is decay" immediately (see Index laws ).
Step 2. Points: x = 0 ⇒ 1 , x = 1 ⇒ 2 1 , x = 2 ⇒ 4 1 , x = − 1 ⇒ 2 .
Why this step? Right of 0 it halves each step (shrinking, never zero); left of 0 it doubles.
Step 3. Range stays y > 0 : a positive number to any power is positive.
In the figure, the yellow curve falls from left to right, and the pink dashed line marks the asymptote y = 0 . Notice the curve flattens toward that line on the right but never crosses it — every plotted dot sits strictly above y = 0 .
Verify: ( 2 1 ) 2 = 0.25 ✔, ( 2 1 ) − 1 = 2 ✔, all outputs > 0 ✔.
5 − 3 and explain the sign of the answer
Forecast: The exponent is negative — will the answer be negative?
Step 1. Use a − n = a n 1 : so 5 − 3 = 5 3 1 .
Why this step? A negative exponent means "reciprocal", not "make the number negative". It comes from demanding 5 − 3 ⋅ 5 3 = 5 0 = 1 .
Step 2. 5 3 = 125 , so 5 − 3 = 125 1 = 0.008 .
Verify: 125 1 = 0.008 > 0 — a positive fraction, exactly what the range y > 0 promised ✔.
8 2/3
Forecast: Which do we do first — the cube-root or the square? Does it matter?
Step 1. Let the exponent be a fraction q p , where p is the numerator (top) and q is the denominator (bottom). The rule from Index laws is
a p / q = q a p ,
i.e. the bottom q tells you which root to take, the top p tells you which power to raise to. Here p = 2 , q = 3 , so 8 2/3 = ( 8 1/3 ) 2 = ( 3 8 ) 2 .
Why this step? Naming p and q makes clear which number becomes a root and which a power, so we never mix them up.
Step 2. 3 8 = 2 , then 2 2 = 4 .
Why this step? Rooting first keeps the numbers small.
Verify: Do it the other order: 8 2 = 64 , 3 64 = 4 — same answer ✔. So 8 2/3 = 4 .
y = 2 x − 5 , state the asymptote, the y -intercept, and the range
Forecast: The bare 2 x had floor y = 0 . If we subtract 5 , does the floor stay put?
Step 1. Subtracting 5 lowers every output by 5 , so the horizontal asymptote drops from y = 0 to y = − 5 .
Why this step? An asymptote is a limiting height; shift the whole graph down and the limit shifts with it (see Graph transformations ).
Step 2. y -intercept: put x = 0 : 2 0 − 5 = 1 − 5 = − 4 , giving ( 0 , − 4 ) .
Why this step? The intercept is just the function evaluated at x = 0 .
Step 3. Range: since 2 x > 0 always, 2 x − 5 > − 5 . So range is y > − 5 .
In the figure the pink dashed line has dropped to y = − 5 (that's the shift amount of 5 below the old floor y = 0 ), and the blue dot marks the intercept ( 0 , − 4 ) .
Verify: As x → − ∞ , 2 x → 0 , so y → − 5 ✔ (approached, never reached). Intercept 2 0 − 5 = − 4 ✔.
y = ( 4 1 ) x is y = 4 x reflected in the y -axis
Forecast: Reflect in the y -axis or the x -axis?
Step 1. ( 4 1 ) x = 4 − x .
Why this step? Turning 4 1 into 4 − 1 exposes the hidden minus sign on the exponent.
Step 2. Replacing x by − x in any function reflects its graph across the y -axis (it swaps left and right).
Why this step? Left/right swap is a y -axis mirror; up/down swap would be an x -axis mirror. The minus is on x , so it's the y -axis.
In the figure the blue curve (4 x , growth) and the yellow curve (( 1/4 ) x , decay) are mirror images: the vertical y -axis is the mirror line . Each point at height h on the right of one curve appears at the same height h on the left of the other, and both share the point ( 0 , 1 ) on the mirror.
Verify: At x = 1 : ( 4 1 ) 1 = 0.25 and 4 − 1 = 0.25 ✔. At x = − 1 : ( 4 1 ) − 1 = 4 and 4 1 = 4 ✔ — reflected points.
2 x = 32 , then 2 x = 20
Forecast: For 32 you can guess. For 20 you can't land on a whole number — what tool releases x from the exponent?
Step 1. 32 = 2 5 , so 2 x = 2 5 ⇒ x = 5 .
Why this step? When both sides are the same base, the exponents must match.
Step 2. For 2 x = 20 , 20 is not a clean power of 2 . We need the inverse operation that "asks which power gives 20 ": the logarithm. So x = log 2 20 (see Logarithms as the inverse of exponentials ).
Why this tool and not another? log 2 is defined precisely to undo 2 x — it's the only operation that pulls the variable down out of the exponent.
Step 3. Numerically log 2 20 = ln 2 ln 20 ≈ 4.3219 .
Verify: 2 5 = 32 ✔. And 2 4.3219 ≈ 20.0 ✔ (between 2 4 = 16 and 2 5 = 32 , so x between 4 and 5 — sensible).
x → − ∞ lim 3 x and x → + ∞ lim ( 3 1 ) x
Forecast: Which curve dies to 0 on the left , and which on the right ?
Step 1. Growth 3 x as x → − ∞ . To make the far-left behaviour easy to read, change variable : let N = − x , so that as x marches to − ∞ , the new letter N marches to + ∞ (it's just the positive distance x has travelled to the left). Substituting x = − N gives 3 x = 3 − N = 3 N 1 . Since N → + ∞ makes 3 N → ∞ , we get 3 N 1 → 0 + . Hence lim x → − ∞ 3 x = 0 .
Why this step? Introducing N turns a scary "negative infinity exponent" into a plain "big positive N " reciprocal — the parent's asymptote argument.
Step 2. Decay ( 3 1 ) x = 3 − x . As x → + ∞ , − x → − ∞ , so by Step 1 this → 0 + . Hence lim x → + ∞ ( 3 1 ) x = 0 .
Why this step? This is cell C6 in action : decay dies at the right end precisely because it is growth mirrored in the y -axis (Example 6). So this one example legitimately covers both cell C8 (limits) and cell C6 (reflection).
Verify: 3 − 10 ≈ 1.7 × 1 0 − 5 ≈ 0 ✔; ( 3 1 ) 10 = 3 − 10 same value ≈ 0 ✔. Both > 0 , never exactly 0 .
Worked example A colony starts at
200 bacteria and triples every hour. How many after 4 hours? After how many hours does it first exceed 50000 ?
Forecast: Is the "200 " a multiplier or a starting amount? Where does it sit in the formula?
Step 1. Build the model: after x hours, N ( x ) = 200 ⋅ 3 x .
Why this step? "× 3 each hour" is exactly repeated multiplication — an exponential (see Exponential growth and decay models ). The 200 is the value at x = 0 , so it multiplies out front.
Step 2. After 4 hours: N ( 4 ) = 200 ⋅ 3 4 = 200 ⋅ 81 = 16200 .
Why this step? Direct substitution — units are bacteria.
Step 3. Solve 200 ⋅ 3 x = 50000 ⇒ 3 x = 250 . This needs the inverse tool: x = log 3 250 = ln 3 ln 250 ≈ 5.024 hours. So it first exceeds 50000 during the 6 th hour — at whole hours, that's after 6 hours (N ( 5 ) = 48600 < 50000 < N ( 6 ) = 145800 ).
Why a log? Same reason as Example 7 — only a logarithm frees x from the exponent.
Verify: N ( 4 ) = 200 ⋅ 81 = 16200 ✔. N ( 5 ) = 200 ⋅ 243 = 48600 < 50000 ✔; N ( 6 ) = 200 ⋅ 729 = 145800 > 50000 ✔ — so 6 hours is the first whole hour above the threshold.
y = 2 x − 8 meets the x -axis at one point and has one asymptote. Find both, and the y -intercept.
Forecast: A shifted exponential can now genuinely cross y = 0 . Where?
Step 1. Asymptote: 2 x → 0 as x → − ∞ , so y → − 8 . Asymptote y = − 8 .
Why this step? The − 8 drops the floor (cell C5). Note it's below the x -axis, so a crossing is now possible.
Step 2. x -axis crossing: set y = 0 : 2 x − 8 = 0 ⇒ 2 x = 8 = 2 3 ⇒ x = 3 . Root at ( 3 , 0 ) .
Why this step? Matching bases gives the exponent directly — no log needed here since 8 is a clean power.
Step 3. y -intercept: x = 0 ⇒ 2 0 − 8 = 1 − 8 = − 7 , giving ( 0 , − 7 ) .
In the figure the pink dashed asymptote sits at y = − 8 (a shift of 8 below the old floor), the blue dot is the root ( 3 , 0 ) where the yellow curve pierces the x -axis, and the off-white dot is the intercept ( 0 , − 7 ) .
Verify: 2 3 − 8 = 0 ✔ so ( 3 , 0 ) is on the axis. 2 0 − 8 = − 7 ✔. As x → − ∞ , y → − 8 ✔ (approached, not reached).
Recall Match each prompt to its cell
What values may the base a take, and why those? ::: a > 0 (else non-real roots like a ) and a = 1 (else 1 x = 1 , a flat constant line). Cell C0 is the excluded a = 1 case.
Solve 2 x = 20 — which tool and why? ::: A logarithm x = log 2 20 ; only the log undoes the exponent (cell C7).
Asymptote of y = 2 x − 5 ? ::: y = − 5 ; the shift lowers the floor (cell C5).
Does ( 3 1 ) x ever go negative? ::: No — positive base to any power is positive; range y > 0 (cell C2).
Which end of 3 x dies to 0 , and what substitution proves it? ::: The left, x → − ∞ ; set N = − x → + ∞ so 3 x = 1/ 3 N → 0 + (cell C8).
Why can y = 2 x − 8 cross the x -axis but y = 2 x cannot? ::: The shift drops the floor below 0 , so a crossing exists at x = 3 (cell C10).
Mnemonic Reading any twisted exponential
"Floor, Door, Score." Floor = the asymptote (where the constant sits). Door = the y -intercept (put x = 0 ). Score = solve for x (match bases, else log).
Is there a constant added