Kya tum spot kar sakte ho ki kaunsi property answer ko instant bana deti hai, bina (almost) kisi arithmetic ke?
Recall Solution 1.1
Columns 1 aur 3 dekho — ye identical hain (3,1,6).
P1 kehta hai column properties row properties ke equal hain, aur P3 kehta hai do equal rows (isliye columns)
determinant ko 0 force kar dete hain.
=0
Koi arithmetic zaroorat nahi — yahi Recognition ka poora point hai.
Recall Solution 1.2
det(A⊤)=detA=7 by P1.
2Ateeno rows ko 2 se scale karta hai, toh P4 corollary se det(2A)=23detA=8⋅7=56.
det(A⊤)=7,det(2A)=56
Recall Solution 1.3
Column 3 poora zeros hai.P7 se (via P1), ek zero row/column deta hai det=0.
=0
Recall Solution 1.4
P8: ek triangular matrix ke liye determinant sirf diagonal ka product hota hai.
detA=2⋅(−3)⋅5=−30
P4/P6/P8 pick karo aur apply karo taaki number jaldi mile.
Recall Solution 2.1
Step 1 (kyun):P6 use karo column 1 clear karne ke liye — ye operations value nahi badaltein.
R2→R2−2R1, R3→R3−R1:
1002−1−3−135.Step 2 (kyun): Diagonal ke neeche column 2 clear karo. R3→R3−3R2:
1002−10−13−4.Step 3: Ab triangular hai. P8 se, det=1⋅(−1)⋅(−4)=4.
Recall Solution 2.2
Step 1 (kyun): Row 1 =3⋅(1,2,3) hai. P4 humein us ek row se 3 factor out karne deta hai.
=3112202320.Step 2 (kyun):P6 se zeros banao. R2→R2−R1, R3→R3−2R1:
=31002−2−23−1−6.Step 3:R3→R3−R2: 1002−203−1−5. P8 se:
=3⋅(1⋅(−2)⋅(−5))=3⋅10=30.
Recall Solution 2.3
P9 corollary se, det(A−1)=detA1=41.
2A−1 saare 3 rows ko 2 se scale karta hai, toh P4 corollary deta hai 23⋅41=8⋅41=2.
R1→R1+4R3: factor ×1 (P6, no change). Running =−30.
detB=−30
Recall Solution 3.2
Idea: row 2 ko P6 use karke collapse karo.
R2→R2−R1 (row 1 subtract karo; P6, value unchanged):
a21b21c21.
Ab row 2 =2⋅(1,1,1)=2⋅ row 3 hai. 2 bahar nikalo (P4):
=2a11b11c11.
Rows 2 aur 3 equal hain ⇒det=0 by P3. Isliye poori cheez 2⋅0=0 hai.
Recall Solution 3.3
A=B=I2 lo (identity). Toh detA=detB=1, isliye detA+detB=2.
Lekin A+B=2I2=(2002) hai, aur P8 se (diagonal) det(2I2)=2⋅2=4.
Kyunki 4=2, "rule" fail ho jaata hai. P5 ek ek baar mein ek row mein linearity hai; poore
matrices add karne se har row change hoti hai ek saath, isliye wo factor nahi hota.
det(A+B)=4=2=detA+detB
Step 1 (kyun): top ke neeche first column ko column operations se clear karo
(P1 column ops ko row ops ki tarah mirror karne deta hai). C3→C3−C2 phir C2→C2−C1:
1aa20b−ab2−a20c−bc2−b2.Step 2: nayi columns mein se factor karo (P4): b2−a2=(b−a)(b+a), c2−b2=(c−b)(c+b):
=(b−a)(c−b)1aa201b+a01c+b.Step 3: row 1 ke along expand karo (sirf top-left 1 survive karta hai), 2×2 bacha rehta hai:
=(b−a)(c−b)[(c+b)−(b+a)]=(b−a)(c−b)(c−a).=(b−a)(c−a)(c−b)
Recall Solution 4.2
Teen properties chain karo:
det(M⊤)=detM by P1.
M⊤=−M ka matlab hai humne saare 3 rows ko −1 se multiply kiya, isliye det(M⊤)=(−1)3detM=−detM
(P4 corollary).
Combine karo: detM=−detM⇒2detM=0⇒detM=0.
(Key: (−1)3=−1 kyunki 3 odd hai — ye even-sized skew matrices ke liye fail hota hai, jahan det nonzero ho sakta hai.)
Poore multi-property arguments; inverses aur transformations se connect karo.
Recall Solution 5.1
Product ko P9, P1, P4 corollary se break karo:
det(A2)=(detA)2=9 (P9 do baar apply karo).
det(B−1)=1/detB=−21.
det(2A⊤)=23det(A⊤)=8⋅detA=24 (P4 corollary + P1).
Multiply karo (order matter nahi karta, det of a product, products of dets hota hai):
9⋅(−21)⋅24=9⋅(−12)=−108.
Recall Solution 5.2
Determinant map ka area-scaling factor hota hai (dekho Linear Transformations & Scaling of Area).
detT=2⋅3−1⋅1=5.
Nayi area =∣detT∣×old area=5×6=30.
Kyunki detT=5>0 hai, orientation preserved hai (koi flip nahi). Figure mein red parallelogram dekho:
area 1 wala unit square area 5 wale region mein ban jaata hai — har shape same factor se scale hoti hai.
Recall Solution 5.3
Agar A−1 exist karta hai, toh AA−1=I. P9 apply karo:
detA⋅det(A−1)=detI=1.
Ek product jo 1 ke equal hai, usmein zero factor nahi ho sakta, isliye detA=0 (aur det(A−1)=1/detA,
P9 corollary).
Iske ulta, agar detA=0 hai toh map area ko 0 par squash kar deta hai (rows linearly dependent hain, P3-style),
isliye ise undo nahi kiya ja sakta — koi inverse exist nahi karta. Ye exactly
Inverse of a Matrix via Adjoint se bridge hai. ■